Skip to main content

Participant Selection and Access in Case Study Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities in Qualitative Research

Abstract

Case study research requires researchers to purposefully select information-rich cases, as they will allow researchers an in-depth understanding of relevant and critical issues under investigation (Patton in Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Newbury Park, 1990, Qual Soc Work 1(3):261–283, 2002). To gain such insights, purposive sampling is generally believed to contribute to the richness in the range of data collected and help increase the possibilities of uncovering multiple realities (Guba and Lincoln in Handb Qual Res 2(163–194):105, 1994). However, dealing with research participants in the case study approach also poses great challenges for novice researchers, as humans can be a difficult factor to control among the variables in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alinejad, D. (2011). Mapping homelands through virtual spaces: Transnational embodiment and Iranian diaspora bloggers. Global Networks, 11(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcury, T., & Quandt, S. (1999). Participant recruitment for qualitative research: A site-based approach to community research in complex societies. Human Organization, 58(2), 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, R. (2014). Introducing qualitative research: A student’s guide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decrop, A. (1999). Qualitative research methods for the study of tourist behaviour. In A. Pizam & Y. Mansfeld. (Eds.), Consumer Behaviour in Travel and Tourism. New York: The Haworth Hospitality Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., Bell, J., & Berger, M. T. (2003). Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. T. (2003). Educational research (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(02), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(163–194), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R. J., & Bowers, B. J. (2006). Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 821–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2015). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, C. (2014). Qualitative approaches in Internet-mediated research: Opportunities, issues, possibilities. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, 423–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johl, S. K., & Renganathan, S. (2010). Strategies for gaining access in doing fieldwork: Reflection of two researchers. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. India: New Age International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (2009). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing elites addressing methodological issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okumus, F., Altinay, L., & Roper, A. (2007). Gaining access for research: Reflections from experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (2015). How to do your case study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Z. Y. (2016). College teacher beliefs and practices in computer-assisted language learning classrooms in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. W., Jost, M., & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, A. (2005). Designing sampling strategies for qualitative social research: With particular reference to the Office for National Statistics’ Qualitative Respondent Register. Survey Methodology Bulletin-office for National Statistics, 56, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). London: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongyan Wan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wan, Z. (2019). Participant Selection and Access in Case Study Research. In: Tsang, K., Liu, D., Hong, Y. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities in Qualitative Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5811-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5811-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5810-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5811-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics