Abstract
Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) are used to redirect the aqueous humor to a subconjunctival/subtenon extraocular reservoir in order to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP). GDDs are frequently implanted in eyes with a previous trabeculectomy, uveitis, and presence of upper perilimbic conjunctival scar or neovascular glaucoma. A GDD consists of a tube that connects the intraocular space directly to the subtenon space or to a valved or non-valved plate. These plates are available in various materials, sizes, and designs and are sutured to the sclera between the rectus muscles [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Martino AZ, Iverson S, Feuer WJ, Greenfield DS. Surgical outcomes of superior versus inferior glaucoma drainage device implantation. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(1):32–6.
Aminlari AE, Scott IU, Aref AA. Glaucoma drainage implant surgery--an evidence-based update with relevance to sub-Saharan Africa. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20(2):126–30.
Molteno AC. New implant for drainage in glaucoma. Clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 1969;53(9):606–15.
Krupin T, Kaufman P, Mandell A, Ritch R, Asseff C, Podos SM, et al. Filtering valve implant surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89(3):338–43.
Smith SL, Starita RJ, Fellman RL, Lynn JR. Early clinical experience with the Baerveldt 350-mm2 glaucoma implant and associated extraocular muscle imbalance. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(6):914–8.
Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, et al. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(1):23–31.
Budenz DL, Barton K, Feuer WJ, Schiffman J, Costa VP, Godfrey DG, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):443–52.
Mehta JS, Franks WA. The sclera, the prion, and the ophthalmologist. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(5):587–92.
Smith MF, Doyle JW, Ticrney JW Jr. A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(2):143–7.
Gil-Carrasco F, Salinas-VanOrman E, Recillas-Gispert C, Paczka JA, Gilbert ME, Arellanes-Garcia L. Ahmed valve implant for uncontrolled uveitic glaucoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 1998;6(1):27–37.
Gdih G, Jiang K. Graft-free Ahmed valve implantation through a 6 mm scleral tunnel. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52(1):85–91.
Sherwood MB, Smith MF. Prevention of early hypotony associated with Molteno implants by a new occluding stent technique. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(1):85–90.
Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, Shiroma L, Khan B, Ahmed II. Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed Glaucoma Valves. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1320–6.
Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Evaluation of the hypertensive phase after insertion of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(6):1001–8.
NewWorldMedical. Ahmed Glaucoma Valve 2017. Available from: http://www.newworldmedical.com/product-glaucoma_valves.
Kim J, Allingham RR, Hall J, Klitzman B, Stinnett S, Asrani S. Clinical experience with a novel glaucoma drainage implant. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(2):e91–7.
Gil-Carrasco F, Jimenez-Roman J, Turati-Acosta M, Bello-Lopez Portillo H, Isida-Llerandi CG. Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of the Ahmed glaucoma valve model M4 (high density porous polyethylene) and the model S2 (polypropylene) in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91(9):409–14.
Cvintal V, Moster MR, Shyu AP, McDermott K, Ekici F, Pro MJ, et al. Initial experience with the new Ahmed Glaucoma Valve model M4: short-term results. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(5):e475–80.
Lewis RA. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(8):1301–6.
Sheybani A, Dick HB, Ahmed II. Early clinical results of a novel Ab interno gel stent for the surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(7):e691–6.
Sheybani A, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Fluid dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(8):4789–95.
Perez-Torregrosa VT, Olate-Perez A, Cerda-Ibanez M, Gargallo-Benedicto A, Osorio-Alayo V, Barreiro-Rego A, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and XEN45 surgery from a temporal approach and 2 incisions. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91(9):415–21.
Batlle JF, Fantes F, Riss I, Pinchuk L, Alburquerque R, Kato YP, et al. Three-year follow-up of a novel aqueous humor MicroShunt. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(2):e58–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
16.1 Electronic supplementary material
(MP4 114270 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barella, K., Costa, V.P. (2019). Modifications of Surgical Techniques in Glaucoma Drainage Devices. In: Gandhi, M., Bhartiya, S. (eds) Glaucoma Drainage Devices. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5773-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5773-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5772-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5773-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)