Abstract
Edwardes provides an account of the creation of a studio in a shared household space. He maps the indeterminate thresholds of the studio through autobiographic accounts of the production of work, alongside three materialist and non-representational examples of theorising the studio. As an artist with an interest in the spaces in which art is made, the temporary annexation of part of a room for the production of a series of works provides a useful point from which to navigate the impositions and intersections of art making. Drawing on different articulations of mediation, intercession, and atmosphere, Edwardes describes the passage of materials and dispositions that cut through experiences of inside and outside.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agamben, G. (2009). The coming community (M. Hardt, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Anderson, B. (2016). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1–36). London, UK: Ashgate.
Ash, J. (2016). Theorizing studio space. In I. Farias & A. Wilkie (Eds.), Studio studies: Operations, topologies and displacements (pp. 91–104). London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. M. (2006). Home. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. London, UK and New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
Bourriaud, N. (2003). Topocritique: L’art contemporain et l’investigation géographique. In P. de Tokyo (Ed.), GNS, Global Navigation System: Palais De Tokyo, Site De Création Contemporaine (pp. 9–39). Paris, France: Cercle d’art.
Cieraad, I. (Ed.). (2006). At home: An anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Coles, A. (2012). The transdisciplinary studio. Berlin, Germany: Sternberg.
Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (Eds.). (2011). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (2007). Introduction: Geography’s ‘Emotional Turn’. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.), Emotional geographies. London, UK: Routledge.
Davidts, W., & Paice, K. (2009). Introduction. In W. Davidts & K. Paice (Eds.), The fall of the studio: Artists at work (pp. 2–20). Valiz, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Antennae.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972-1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Douglas, M. (1991). The idea of a home: A kind of space. Social Research,58, 287–307.
Edwardes, C. (2008a). West [C-type print]. Collection of the artist.
Edwardes, C. (2008b). Nadir [C-type print]. Collection of the artist.
Griffero, T. (2016). Atmospheres: Aesthetics of emotional spaces (S. de Sanctis, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge.
Gouma-Peterson, T. (1997). Miriam schapiro: An art of becoming. American Art,11, 10–45.
Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Grosz, E. (2013). Habit today: Ravaisson, Bergson, Deleuze and us. Body & Society,19, 217–239.
Hawkins, H. (2014). For creative geographies: Geography, visual arts and the making of worlds. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hennion, A. (1989). An intermediary between production and consumption: The producer of popular music. Science, Technology and Human Values,14, 400–424.
Hennion, A., & Farìas, I. (2016). For a sociology of maquettes: An interview with Antoine Hennion. In I. Farìas & A. Wilkie (Eds.), Studio studies: Operations, topologies and displacements. London, UK: Routledge.
Jones, C. A. (1996). Machine in the studio: Constructing the postwar American artist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kontturi, K.-K. (2013). From double navel to particle-sign: Toward the a-signifying work of painting. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK and New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
Kwon, M. (2004). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lippard, L. R. (1998). The lure of the local: Senses of place in a multicentered society. New York, NY: New Press.
Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography,29, 83–94.
Madigan, R., & Munro, M. (1999). The more we are together: Domestic space, gender and privacy. In T. Chapman & J. Hockey (Eds.), Ideal homes? Social change and the experience of the home. London, UK: Routledge.
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. London, UK and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Massumi, B. (Ed.). (2002). A shock to thought: Expressions after Deleuze and Guattari. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
McCormack, D. P. (2008). Geographies for moving bodies: Thinking, dancing, spaces. Geography Compass,2, 1822–1836.
Merriman, P. (2014). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9(2), 167–187.
O’Sullivan, S. (2006). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Perry, G. (2013). Playing at home: The house in contemporary art. London, UK: Reaktion Books.
Pollock, G. (1988). Vision and difference: Femininity, feminism, and histories of art. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Reed, C. (Ed.). (1996). Not at home: The suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.
Rodriguez, V. (2002). L’atelier et l’exposition: Deux espaces en tension entre l’origine et la diffusion de l’oeuvre. Sociologie et sociétés,34, 121.
Thrift, N. J. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.
Winkenweder, B. (2010). The kitchen as art studio: Gender, performance, and domestic aesthetics. In M. J. Jacob & M. Grabner (Eds.), The studio reader: On the space of artists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wood, N., Duffy, M., & Smith, S. J. (2007). The art of doing (geographies of) music. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,25, 867–889.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwardes, C. (2019). Micro-Geographies of the Studio. In: Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (eds) Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5748-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5749-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)