Abstract
As the introduction to the edited collection, this chapter discusses historical trends in the theory and practice of art in the context of the affective turn, which have brought cultural geography and the creative arts closer than ever before. This is followed by a brief overview of non-representational theory—its beginnings, its implications for research methodology, and its promise for creative and collaborative work at the art-geography nexus. The chapter concludes with a description of the structure and organisation of the book and its contributions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and human geography. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London, UK: Verso.
Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.
Batista, A., & Lesky, C. (2015). Sidewalk stories: Janet Cardiff’s audio-visual excursions. Word & Image,31, 515–523.
Bishop, C. (2006). The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. Artforum International,44, 178–183.
Bolt, B., & Barrett, E. (Eds.). (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.
Bolt, B., Barrett, E., & Kontturi, K. K. (2017). Editorial. Studies in Material Thinking, 16
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon, France: Les Presses du Réel.
Bourriaud, N. (2003). Topocritique: l’art contemporain et l’investigation géographique. In Palais de Tokyo (Ed.), GNS, Global Navigation System: Palais De Tokyo, Site De Création Contemporaine (pp. 9–39). Paris: Cercle d’art.
Boyd, C. P. (2017). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: Thinking through practice. London, UK: Palgrave.
Cadman, L. (2009). Nonrepresentational theory/Nonrepresentational geographies. In R. Kitchen & N. Thrit (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (1st ed). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cox, C., Jaskey, J., & Malik, S. (2015). Realism materialism art. Berlin, Germany: Sternberg.
Crouch, D. (2010). Flirting with space: Journeys and creativity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Dall, A., Hyland, S., Leung, M., & Riding, D. (2016). We have your art gallery. Engage, 37, 136–142.
Dewsbury, J.-D. (2010). Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In D. Delyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography. London, UK: Sage.
Doherty, C. (2004). Contemporary art: From studio to situation. London, UK: Black Dog.
Edwardes, C. (2015). Peregrinations with maps and landscapes: Narrating the spaces of practice in Fine Art (Doctoral dissertation) University of the Arts London.
Finkelpearl, T. (2001). Dialogues in public art. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Finkelpearl, T. (2014). Participatory Art. In M. Kelly (ed.), Encyclopedia of aesthetics (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
French, B., & Loxley, A. (2016). Civic actions: Artists’ practices beyond the museum. Sydney, Australia: Museum of Contemporary Art.
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Grusin, R. (2015). The nonhuman turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kirschner, R. (2017). Raw flows: Fluid mattering in arts and research. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Kwon, M. (2004). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lange-Berndt, P. (2015). Materiality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lin, T. (2003). Following the money. Art in America,91, 142–147.
Lippard, L. (1997). The lure of the local. New York, NY: New Press.
Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography,29, 83–94.
Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography,32, 551–559.
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marte, I. (2007). Documenta Kassel: 16/06-23/09 2007: Katalog = catalogue. Köln: Taschen.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
O’Sullivan, S. (2006). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Rothman, R., & Verstegen, I. (2015). The art of the real. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Sedgwick, E. K., & Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading silvan tomkins. In E. K. Sedgwick & A. Frank (Eds.), Shame and its sisters: A Silvan Tomkins reader (pp. 1–28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Stange, R. (2003). A utopian citizen? Parkett,68, 46–53.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society,23, 139–146.
Tiravanija, R., & Sze, S. (2013). Thing theories. Artforum International,51, 111–112.
Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2013). The geographies of cultural geography III: Material geographies, vibrant matters and risking surface geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 153–160.
Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. London, UK: Routledge.
Ventura, H. K. (2016). Get involved! Participation and marketing: On Theaster Gates’s model of success. Kunstforum International,240, 110–121.
Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The spatial turn. London, UK: Routledge.
Witzgall, S. (2014). Material experiments: “Phenomeno-technology” in the art of the new materialists. In M. Schwab (Ed.), Experimental systems. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Witzgall, S., & Stakemeier, K. (2014). Power of material/politics of materiality. Zurich, Switzerland: Diaphanes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (2019). Creative Practice and the Non-Representational. In: Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (eds) Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5748-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5749-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)