Skip to main content

Creative Practice and the Non-Representational

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts

Abstract

As the introduction to the edited collection, this chapter discusses historical trends in the theory and practice of art in the context of the affective turn, which have brought cultural geography and the creative arts closer than ever before. This is followed by a brief overview of non-representational theory—its beginnings, its implications for research methodology, and its promise for creative and collaborative work at the art-geography nexus. The chapter concludes with a description of the structure and organisation of the book and its contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and human geography. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London, UK: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, A., & Lesky, C. (2015). Sidewalk stories: Janet Cardiff’s audio-visual excursions. Word & Image,31, 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. (2006). The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. Artforum International,44, 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, B., & Barrett, E. (Eds.). (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, B., Barrett, E., & Kontturi, K. K. (2017). Editorial. Studies in Material Thinking, 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon, France: Les Presses du Réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. (2003). Topocritique: l’art contemporain et l’investigation géographique. In Palais de Tokyo (Ed.), GNS, Global Navigation System: Palais De Tokyo, Site De Création Contemporaine (pp. 9–39). Paris: Cercle d’art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. P. (2017). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: Thinking through practice. London, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, L. (2009). Nonrepresentational theory/Nonrepresentational geographies. In R. Kitchen & N. Thrit (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (1st ed). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C., Jaskey, J., & Malik, S. (2015). Realism materialism art. Berlin, Germany: Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (2010). Flirting with space: Journeys and creativity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall, A., Hyland, S., Leung, M., & Riding, D. (2016). We have your art gallery. Engage, 37, 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury, J.-D. (2010). Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In D. Delyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, C. (2004). Contemporary art: From studio to situation. London, UK: Black Dog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwardes, C. (2015). Peregrinations with maps and landscapes: Narrating the spaces of practice in Fine Art (Doctoral dissertation) University of the Arts London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelpearl, T. (2001). Dialogues in public art. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelpearl, T. (2014). Participatory Art. In M. Kelly (ed.), Encyclopedia of aesthetics (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, B., & Loxley, A. (2016). Civic actions: Artists’ practices beyond the museum. Sydney, Australia: Museum of Contemporary Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (2015). The nonhuman turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, R. (2017). Raw flows: Fluid mattering in arts and research. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, M. (2004). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Berndt, P. (2015). Materiality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. (2003). Following the money. Art in America,91, 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, L. (1997). The lure of the local. New York, NY: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography,29, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography,32, 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marte, I. (2007). Documenta Kassel: 16/06-23/09 2007: Katalog = catalogue. Köln: Taschen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, S. (2006). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, R., & Verstegen, I. (2015). The art of the real. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. K., & Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading silvan tomkins. In E. K. Sedgwick & A. Frank (Eds.), Shame and its sisters: A Silvan Tomkins reader (pp. 1–28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stange, R. (2003). A utopian citizen? Parkett,68, 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society,23, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiravanija, R., & Sze, S. (2013). Thing theories. Artforum International,51, 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2013). The geographies of cultural geography III: Material geographies, vibrant matters and risking surface geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, H. K. (2016). Get involved! Participation and marketing: On Theaster Gates’s model of success. Kunstforum International,240, 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The spatial turn. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall, S. (2014). Material experiments: “Phenomeno-technology” in the art of the new materialists. In M. Schwab (Ed.), Experimental systems. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall, S., & Stakemeier, K. (2014). Power of material/politics of materiality. Zurich, Switzerland: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candice P. Boyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (2019). Creative Practice and the Non-Representational. In: Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (eds) Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5748-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5749-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics