Abstract
To better investigate the issue of Internet addiction in China, studies were conducted at different levels. As the beginning, this chapter dealt with the macro level, to provide the context for the following studies. The objective of this chapter is to depict an overall picture of Internet addiction in media reports and the variations over time. Specifically, this study examines the media coverage of Internet addiction in the Region of Greater China, especially the Mainland Chinese newspapers in the past 12 years. This study combines the diffusion approach (Rogers 2003) and the functions of frames (Entman 1993), and thus gives a more detailed picture of how media coverage of Internet addiction changed over time. Employing a content analysis of newspaper articles from 1998 to 2009 in Mainland China, this chapter showed that the trend of media coverage regarding Internet addiction manifested itself following the classic S-shaped diffusion curve. The associations between phases, frames, prominence, and reporting variables were also tested. The findings revealed the role of media frames in constructing public consciousness about a specific issue (Pan 2009).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Allen, B., O’Laughlin, P., Jasperson, A., & Sullivan, J. L. (1994). The media and the Gulf War: Framing, priming, and the spiral of silence. Polity, 27, 255–284.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (2001). Covering the crisis in Somalia: Framing choices by the New York Times and the Manchester Guardian. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 175–184). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barnett, G. A. (2011). Mathematical models of the diffusion process. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 103–122). New York: Peter Lang.
Becker, M. H. (1970a). Factors affecting the diffusion of innovation among health professionals. American Journal of Public Health, 60, 294–304.
Becker, M. H. (1970b). Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 35, 267–282.
Brewer, P. R., Graf, J., & Willnat, L. (2003). Priming or framing: Media influence on attitudes toward foreign countries. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 65(6), 493–508.
CNNIC. (2011). The 27th statistical survey report on the internet development in China (in Chinese). Retrieved March 8, 2011, from China Internet Network Information Center website: http://www.cnnic.cn/research/bgxz/tjbg/201101/P020110221534255749405.pdf
Danowski, J. A., Gluesing, J., & Riopelle, K. (2011). The revolution in diffusion theory caused by new media. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 123–144). New York: Peter Lang.
De Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122.
Dearing, J. W., & Meyer, G. (2011). The active adopter in the diffusion of innovations. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 207–230). New York: Peter Lang.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gamson, W. A., & Lasch, K. E. (1983). The political cultural of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro & E. Yuchtman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the welfare state: Social and political perspectives (pp. 397–415). New York: Academic.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology, 3, 137–177.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., & Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in health service organizations: A systematic literature review. Malden: Blackwell.
Jasperson, A. E., Shah, D. V., Watts, M., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D. P. (1998). Framing and the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15, 205–224.
Karnowski, V., Von Pape, T., & Wirth, W. (2011). Overcoming the binary logic of adoption: On the integration of diffusion of innovations theory and the concept of appropriation. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 57–75). New York: Peter Lang.
Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Cooper Square.
Lievrouw, L. A. (2002). Determination and contingency in new media development: Diffusion of innovations and social shaping of technology perspective. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 183–199). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Free Press.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.
Pan, J. (2009). Mediating ideology and cultural realities. Journalism Studies, 10(6), 805–820.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–76.
Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. (1972). Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15–24.
Schoenbach, K., & Becker, L. B. (1995). Origins and consequences of mediated public opinion. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 323–347). New York: Guilford.
Segvic, I. (2005). The framing of politics: A content analysis of three Croatian newspapers. The International Journal for Communication, 67(5), 469–488.
Shaw, D. (1990). Choosing sides: Media abortion bias may taint coverage of news, study says. Austin American-Statesman, C1, C9.
Singhal, A. (2011). Turing diffusion of innovations paradigm on its head. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 193–205). New York: Peter Lang.
Soroka, S. N. (2003). Media, public opinion and foreign policy. Press/Politics, 8(1), 27–48.
Syzkowny, R. (1990). The humanist interview: Bewildering the herd. The Humanist, 8–17.
Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–106). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Tutzauer, F., Kwon, K. H., & Elbirt, B. (2011). Network diffusion of two competing ideas: An application of agent-based modeling. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 145–170). New York: Peter Lang.
van de Wijngaert, L., & Bouwman, H. (2011). Theoretical and methodological starting points for a situational approach towards the understanding of the adoption and use of new technologies and services. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 77–101). New York: Peter Lang.
Vishwanath, A., & Chen, H. (2011). Towards a comprehensive understanding of the innovation-decision process. In A. Vishwanath & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective (pp. 9–32). New York: Peter Lang.
Wang, X., & Shoemaker, P. J. (2011). What shapes Americans’ opinion of China? Country characteristics, public relations and mass media. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(1), 1–20.
Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.-W. (1993). The agenda-setting effect of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(3), 250–264.
Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 364–377.
Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326.
Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376–383.
Zhao, Y. (1998). Media, market, and democracy in China: Between the party line and the bottom line. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Zhao, Y. (2000). Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies, 1, 577–597.
Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57, 79–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, Q. (2019). Public Concern and Media Coverage of Internet Addiction. In: Internet Addiction Among Cyberkids in China: Risk Factors and Intervention Strategies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3792-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3792-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3791-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3792-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)