Abstract
The establishment of the exclusionary rule has a far-reaching influence on the trial procedure. In some cases, dispute over the legality of evidence has become the main issue between the prosecution and defense in court.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Criminal Procedure Code of Germany (1995).
- 4.
Taguchi (2000).
- 5.
Deyong (2013).
- 6.
Wang (2015).
- 7.
The people’s juror system is different from the counterpart in the United States. According the Chinese law, people’s jurors shall participate in the whole trial procedure together with judges, and assume the same power and responsibility with judges, which means that the people’s jurors will be responsible for both fact finding and legal application.
- 8.
Criminal Law Division (2012).
- 9.
Wang (2015).
- 10.
Yang (2014).
- 11.
Yang (2014).
- 12.
Wang (2015).
- 13.
Wang (2015).
- 14.
Chen (2005, p. 300).
- 15.
Chen (2005, p. 349).
- 16.
Wang (2015).
- 17.
Deyong (2015).
- 18.
Xiong (2010).
- 19.
Deyong (2015).
- 20.
Deyong (2013).
- 21.
Liu (2014).
- 22.
Deyong (2013).
- 23.
Chen (2010).
References
Chen R (2005) Theory of procedural sanctions. China Legal Publishing House, p 300
Chen R (2005) Theory of procedural sanctions. China Legal Publishing House, p 349
Chen R (2010) Leeway judgment: a kind of judgment which is worthy of reflection, Legal Forum (4)
Criminal Procedure Code of Germany (1995) Translated by Li C. University of Political Science & Law Press, China
Criminal law research center of china university of political science and law (1998) New development in criminal procedures of UK—Mission report in UK. J Proced Law (Vol. 2). Law Press, China, pp 346–354
Criminal Law Division of the Sub-committee of Legislative Affairs of the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China (2012) Illustration on the provisions, legislative reasons and relevant provisions on the decision on amending the criminal procedural law of the People’s Republic of China. Peking University Press, p 215
Deyong S (2013) On in dubio pro reo. Chin Legal Sci (5)
Deyong (2015) On the reform of trial-centered procedural system. Chin Legal Sci (3)
Liu J (2014) Towards intricate Justice, People’s Court Daily (2)
Shen D (2013) How should we prevent errors of justice, people’s court daily, p 2
Taguchi M (2000) (たぐち もりかず). Criminal procedural law, Translated by Liu D et al. Law Press, pp 195–198
US Criminal Procedural Rules and Evidence Rules (1996) Translated by Bian J. University of Political Science & Law Press, China
Wang J, Zhen Z (2007) Comparative study on the criminal procedure in the frist instance. Law Press, China, p 75
Wang J, Zhen Z (2007) Comparative study on the criminal procedure in the first instance. Law Press, China, p 298
Wang H (2015) On the substantialness of the criminal trial. Soc Sci Chin (2)
Xiong Q (2010) Periodical progress in the development of criminal evidence system: comment on two evidence provisions, evidence science (5)
Yang Y et al (2014) Practical investigation on the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence and pretrial conference. J Natl Prosec Coll (3)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Law Press China
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, J. (2019). The Exclusionary Rule and Trial Procedure Reform. In: The Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China. Masterpieces of Contemporary Jurisprudents in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3756-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3756-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3755-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3756-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)