Skip to main content

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Urology
  • 662 Accesses

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), is one of the most lethal malignant neoplasms of the urologic cancers, which represents 2–3% of all cancers. 5-year survival rate of RCC is near 90% in stage I, and 70% in stage II [1]. The incidence of RCCs has been increased over the past several decades due to the common use of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT). Majority of these tumors are at lower clinical stage upon diagnosis, which may allow preservation of renal function without compromising oncological outcome. According to the 2015 Guidelines of European Association of Urology, other than angiomyolipoma (AML), most of the renal tumors cannot be differentiated from RCC by radiology assessment, should be treated as RCC [2–4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2006;176(6. Pt 1):2353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rini BI, Campbell SC, Escudier B. Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1119–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, Campbell S, Van Poppel H. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol. 2014;65:372–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009;181(1):55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer. 2009;115(7):1465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2):468–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patard JJ, Bensalah KC, Pantuck AJ, et al. Radical nephrectomy is not superior to nephron sparing surgery in PT1B-PT2N0M0 renal tumours: a matched comparison analysis in 546 cases. Eur Urol Suppl. 2008;7:194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang HA. Park YH, Hong S-H. oncologic and functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in T1b renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, matched case-control study in Korean patients. J Urol. 2013;189(4S):e675.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simmons MN, Weight CJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(5):1077–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dash A, Vickers AJ, Schachter LR, et al. Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4–7 cm. BJU Int. 2006;97(5):939–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Butler BP, Novick AC, Miller DP, et al. Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery. Urology. 1995;45(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology. 2010;75(6):1328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinata N, Fujisawa M. Current status of robotic partial nephrectomy in Japan. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57(Suppl 2):S121–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dube H, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. The learning curve and factors affecting warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(3):223–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Haseebuddin M, Benway BM, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon. J Endourol. 2010;24(1):57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, White MA, Forest S, Autorino R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology. 2010;76:754–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.a.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JH, You CH, Min GE, et al. Comparison of the surgical outcome and renal function between radical and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinomas. Korean J Urol. 2007;48:671–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2012;62(6):1023–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bi L, Zhang C, Li K, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67:891–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1257–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(1):38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, et al. Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2004;64(5):919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nadler RB, Loeb S, Clemens JQ, et al. A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors—is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach? J Urol. 2006;175(4):1230–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, et al. A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study. BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):256–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wahafu W, Ma X, Li HZ, et al. Evolving renorrhaphy technique for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon series. Int J Urol. 2014;21:865–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel M, Porter J. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2013;31:1377–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol. 2013;27:869–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol. 2014;66:542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol. 2014;32:1523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol. 2015;29:1137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, Stief C, Gill I, Guazzoni G, et al. Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56:625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson RH, Frank I, Lohse CM, Saad IR, Fergany A, Zincke H, et al. The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2007;177:471–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hruby S, Lusuardi L, Jeschke S, Janetschek G. Cooling mechanisms in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: are they really necessary? Arch Esp Urol. 2013;66:139–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ward JP. Determination of the optimum temperature for regional renal hypothermia during temporary renal ischaemia. Br J Urol. 1975;47:17–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gill IS, Abreu SC, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, Ramani AP, Ng C, et al. Laparoscopic ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience. J Urol. 2003;170:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schoeppler GM, Klippstein E, Hell J, Hacker A, Trojan L, Alken P, et al. Prolonged cold ischemia time for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with a new cooling material: Freka-Gelice-a comparison of four cooling methods. J Endourol. 2010;24:1151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saitz TR, Dorsey PJ, Colli J, Lee BR. Induction of cold ischemia in patients with solitary kidney using retrograde intrarenal cooling: 2-year functional outcomes. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Landman J, Venkatesh R, Lee D, Vanlangendonck R, Morissey K, Andriole GL, et al. Renal hypothermia achieved by retrograde endoscopic cold saline perfusion: technique and initial clinical application. Urology. 2003;61:1023–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Janetschek G, Abdelmaksoud A, Bagheri F, Al-Zahrani H, Leeb K, Gschwendtner M. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion. J Urol. 2004;171:68–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and People's Medical Publishing House

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lyu, X., Ma, X., Li, H., Zhang, X. (2020). Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. In: Zhang, X. (eds) Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Urology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3738-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3738-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3737-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3738-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics