Abstract
Prompted by the authors’ reflection of their own Human-Computer Interaction research on games and older people, and analysis of previous and related works, this chapter presents a critical literature review of contemporary research on digital games with older people. This chapter argues that much of the research conducted in this field has been performed in a descriptive fashion, without strong integration of important theories of ageing, such as Socioemotional Selective Theory, Selective Optimization with Compensation Theory, Life-Span Theory of Control, Continuity and Disengagement theories, despite their relevance and potential for developing systematic and cross-disciplinary knowledge. This chapter shows the relationship between these theories and key elements of research on games with older people, such as emotions and motivations. This chapter also shows that older people are often portrayed as either actual or potential players of digital games, which are widely regarded as being a solution to solve or fix most of their problems. This chapter calls for a re-examining of the way in which older people and digital games are constructed by drawing upon the conceptual tools provided by theories of ageing, in an attempt to co-construct games wherein diversity, agency, life experiences, and identity receive further attention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baltes, P., & Baltes, M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging. Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bengtson, V., & Settersten, R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of theories of aging. New York: Springer.
Brown, J. (2012). Let’s play: Understanding the role and meaning of digital games in the lives of older adults. In Foundations of digital games (pp. 10–12). Raleigh, NC: ACM.
Brown, J., & De Schutter, B. (2016). Game design for older adults: Lessons from a life course perspective. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgcms.2016010101.
Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913–1915. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488.
Carstensen, L. L. (2011). A long bright future. Happiness, health, and financial security in an age of increased longevity. New York: Public Affairs.
Charles, S., & Carstensen, L. (2009). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review Psychology, 61, 383–409.
Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory. A practice guide through qualitative analysis. London (UK): Sage.
Cole, T., Achenbaum, W., Jakobi, P., & Kastenbaum, R. (1993). Voices and visions of aging. Towards a critical gerontology. New York: Springer.
de la Hera, T., Loos, E., Simons, M., & Blom, J. (2017). Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: A systematic literature review. Societies, 7, 18.
De Schutter, B. (2011). Never too old to play: The appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games and Culture, 6, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364978.
De Schutter, B., Brown, J., & Abeele, V. (2014). The domestication of digital games in the lives of older adults. New Media & Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522945.
De Schutter, B., & Malliet, S. (2014). The older player of digital games: A classification based on perceived need satisfaction. Communications, 39, 67–88.
Diggs, J. (2008). The continuity theory of ageing. In Encyclopedia of aging and public health (pp. 233–234). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33754-8.
Durick, J., Brereton, M., Vetere, F., & Nansen, B. (2013). Dispelling ageing myths in technology design. In OzCHI (pp. 467–476). Adelaide, Australia.
George, L., & Ferraro, K. (2016). Ageing and the social sciences: Progress and prospects. In L. George & K. Ferraro (Eds.), Handbook of ageing and the social sciences (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Academic Press.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Hakkarainen, P. (2012). No good for shovelling snow and carrying firewood: Social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish non-users. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1198–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812442663.
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668.
Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age. Theorising the fourth age. London: Palgrave.
Huizinga, J. (1944). Homo ludens. Switzerland: Routledge.
Hummert, M. L. (2011). Age stereotypes and aging. In K. W. Schaie & S. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of aging (pp. 249–262). Oxford: Academic Press.
Katz, S. (2001). Growing older without aging? Positive aging, anti-ageism, and anti-ageing. Generations, 27–32.
Marshall, W., & Bengtson, V. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on the sociology of ageing. In R. Settersten & J. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 17–35). London (UK): Springer.
Marston, H. (2013). Design recommendations for digital game design within an ageing. Educational Gerontology, 39, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2012.689936.
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: The Penguin Press.
Mosberg Iversen, S. (2016). Play and productivity. The constitution of ageing adults in research on digital games. Games and Culture, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014557541.
Nap, H., Kort, Y., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2009). Senior gamers: Preferences, motivations and needs. Gerontechnology Journal, 8, 247–262.
Neven, L. (2010). “But obviously not for me”: Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health and Illness, 32(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x.
Osmanovic, S., & Pecchioni, L. (2016). Beyond entertainment: Motivations and outcomes of video game playing by older adults and their younger family members. Games and Culture, 11(1–2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015602819.
Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter. The co-construction of users and technologies. London, England: The MIT Press.
Parra, C., Silver, P., Kfhaghani, I., Daniel, F., de Bruin, E., Cernuzzi, L., et al. (2013). Information technology for active ageing: A review of theory and practice. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 7(4), 351–448.
Pearce, C. (2008). The truth about baby boomer gamers: A study of over-forty computer game players. Games and Culture, 3, 142–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008314132.
Righi, V., Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2017). When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a ‘turn to community’ in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 108, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.005.
Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory. Classical, modern, and contemporary. San Rafael, US: Morgan & Claypool.
Rogers, Y., & Marsden, G. (2013). Does he take sugar? Moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. Interactions, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486238.
Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2010). Telling the story of older people e-mailing: An ethnographical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.10.004.
Sayago, S., Rosales, A., Righi, V., Ferreira, S. M., Coleman, G. W., & Blat, J. (2016). On the conceptualization, design, and evaluation of appealing, meaningful, and playable digital games for older people. Games and Culture, 11(1–2), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015597108.
Schulz, R., Wahl, H. W., Matthews, J. T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015). Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist, 55(5), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu071.
Silverstone, R. (2005). Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, et al. (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 229–248). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu061.
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2015). An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696867.
Voida, A., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Console gaming across generations: Exploring intergenerational interactions in collocated console gaming. Universal Access Information Society, 11, 45–56.
Wagner, W., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., et al. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian journal of social psychology, 2(1), 95–125.
Weaver, C. K., Zorn, T., & Richardson, M. (2010). Goods not wanted. Information, Communication & Society, 13(5), 696–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903410535.
Zhang, F., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Older adults’ social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Games and Culture, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015601757.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sayago, S., Rosales, A., Righi, V., Ferreira, S.M., Coleman, G.W., Blat, J. (2019). Digital Games and Older People from a Theoretical and Conceptual Perspective: A Critical Literature Review. In: Neves, B., Vetere, F. (eds) Ageing and Digital Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3692-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3693-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)