Design of Social Network Services for and with Older Adults

  • Carlos DuarteEmail author
  • José Coelho


Social network services are one example of how technology can help address social isolation. However, many attempts at creating social networks for older adults have failed. The reasons for the failures are complex but are often a consequence of poorly designed solutions. As a part of our research, we have designed different interfaces for Facebook, the largest social network service, aiming to address these issues. We have followed a co-design process, actively involving older adults in the understanding, conceptualisation and validation stages, that is, throughout the whole design cycle of the interfaces. This chapter discusses the design approach followed, in the context of the developed prototypes. It also highlights the challenges faced when working with older adults (e.g. accessing their knowledge; unwillingness to participate in formal evaluation activities) and how we addressed them (e.g. using techniques that focus on the concrete instead of the abstract; evaluating as if we were designing) and presents an overview of the different user research techniques employed. Even though the research reported here has focused on the design of interfaces for social network services, this knowledge can be beneficial for those researching other types of digital services for older adults.


Older adults Social network services Co-design Prototyping Understanding Conceptualisation Validation Reflections 


  1. Andresen, E. A., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 77–84. Scholar
  2. Apaolaza, A., Harper, S., & Jay, C. (2013). Understanding users in the wild. Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A ‘13) (p. 4). New York: ACM.
  3. Barrett, J., & Kirk, S. (2000). Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. Applied Ergonomics, 31(6), 621–629. Scholar
  4. Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In CHI ‘11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571–580). New York: ACM.
  5. Chen, Y. (2009). Usability analysis on online social networks for the elderly. Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Coelho, J., & Duarte, C. (2016, May). A literature survey on older adults’ use of social network services and social applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 58(C), 187–205. Scholar
  7. Coelho, J., Rito, F., & Duarte, C. (2017). “You, me & TV”—Fighting social isolation of older adults with Facebook, TV and multimodality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 38–50. Scholar
  8. Coelho, J., Rito, F., Luz, N., & Duarte, C. (2015). Prototyping TV and tablet Facebook interfaces for older adults. In Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 110–128). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Scholar
  9. Coleman, G. W., Gibson, L., Hanson, V. L., Bobrowicz, A., & McKay, A. (2010). Engaging the disengaged: How do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ‘10) (pp. 175–178). New York: ACM.
  10. Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., & Favela, J. (2013). Enriching in-person encounters through social media: A study on family connectedness for the elderly. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(9), 889–899. Scholar
  11. Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009a). Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64B(1), 38–46. Scholar
  12. Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009b). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 31–48. Scholar
  13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Scholar
  14. Derboven, J., Van Gils, M., & De Grooff, D. (2012). Designing for collaboration: A study in intergenerational social game design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(1), 57–65. Scholar
  15. Facebook. (2018). Company info. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from
  16. Garattini, C., Wherton, J., & Prendergast, D. (2012). Linking the lonely: An exploration of a communication technology designed to support social interaction among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(2), 211–222. Scholar
  17. Gibson, L., Moncur, W., Forbes, P., Arnott, J., Martin, C., & Bhachu, A. S. (2010). Designing social networking sites for older adults. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (BCS ‘10) (pp. 186–194). Swinton: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
  18. Gomes, G., Duarte, C., Coelho, J., & Matos, E. (2014). Designing a Facebook interface for senior users. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 8. Scholar
  19. Harley, D., Howland, K., Harris, E., & Redlich, C. (2014). Online communities for older users: What can we learn from local community interactions to create social sites that work for older people. In Proceedings of the 28th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference on HCI 2014—Sand, Sea and Sky—Holiday HCI (BCS-HCI ‘14) (pp. 42–51). British Computer Society.
  20. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. Scholar
  21. Hope, A., Schwaba, T., & Piper, A. (2014). Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14) (pp. 3903–3912). New York: ACM.
  22. Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘08) (pp. 1027–1036). New York: ACM.
  23. Karahasanović, A., Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., Lüders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., et al. (2009). Co-creation and user-generated content-elderly people’s user requirements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 655–678. Scholar
  24. Lehtinen, V., Näsänen, J., & Sarvas, R. (2009). “A little silly and empty-headed”: Older adults’ understandings of social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS-HCI ‘09) (pp. 45–54). Swinton: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
  25. Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., & Paiva, A. (2008). iCat: An affective game buddy based on anticipatory mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems—Volume 3 (pp. 1229–1232). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Google Scholar
  26. Leme, R. R., Amaral, A. R., & Zaina, L. A. (2014). Interaction with mobile devices on social networks by elderly people: A survey in Brazil with Facebook. In Computing Conference (CLEI), 2014 XL Latin American. IEEE.
  27. Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3–6.Google Scholar
  28. Mazzeo, R. S., Cavanagh, P., Evans, W. J., Fiatarone, M., Hagberg, J., McAuley, E., et al. (1998). Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(6), 992–1008. Scholar
  29. Meza-Kubo, V., Moran, A. L., & Rodriguez, M. D. (2009). Intergenerational communication systems in support for elder adults with cognitive decline. In 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE.
  30. Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., et al. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. Scholar
  31. Norris, F. H., & Murrell, S. A. (1990). Social support, life events, and stress as modifiers of adjustment to bereavement by older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5(3), 429–436. Scholar
  32. Norval, C., Arnott, J. L., & Hanson, V. L. (2014). What’s on your mind? Investigating recommendations for inclusive social networking and older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14) (pp. 3923–3932). New York: ACM.
  33. Ortman, J. M., Velkoff, V. A., & Hogan, H. (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States. United States Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  34. Perissinotto, C. M., Cenzer, I. S., & Covinsky, K. E. (2012). Loneliness in older persons, a predictor of functional decline and death. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(14), 1078–1084. Scholar
  35. Prieto-Flores, M.-E., Forjaz, M., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., & Martinez-Martin, P. (2011). Factors associated with loneliness of noninstitutionalized and institutionalized older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 23(1), 177–194. Scholar
  36. Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2013). Studying smartphone usage: Lessons from a four-month field study. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(7), 1417–1427. Scholar
  37. Rodolfo, I., Correia, N., Duarte, C., Louro, C., & Almeida, R. (2016). Perspectives on user experience for a nation-wide senior telehealth program. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2016).
  38. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. Scholar
  39. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. Scholar
  40. Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 65B(2), 135–144. Scholar
  41. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Sinclair, T. J., & Grieve, R. (2017). Facebook as a source of social connectedness in older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 363–369. Scholar
  43. Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Retrieved May 2018, from Pew Research Center:
  44. Statista. (2018). Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2018, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved May 2018, from The Statistics Portal:
  45. Stößel, C., & Blessing, L. (2010). Mobile device interaction gestures for older users. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI ‘10) (pp. 793–796). New York: ACM.
  46. Sundar, S., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Nussbaum, J., & Behr, R. (2011). Retirees on Facebook: Can online social networking enhance their health and wellness? In CHI ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2287–2292). ACM.
  47. Victor, C., Scambler, S., & Bond, J. (2009). The social world of older people: Understanding loneliness and social isolation in later life. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education. Scholar
  48. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2013). Older adults as digital content producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘13) (pp. 39–48). New York: ACM.
  49. Xie, B., Druin, A., Fails, J., Massey, S., Golub, E., Franckel, S., et al. (2012a). Connecting generations: Developing co-design methods for older adults and children. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 413–423. Scholar
  50. Xie, B., Watkins, I., Goldbeck, J., & Huang, M. (2012b). Understanding and changing older adults’ perceptions and learning of social media. Educational Gerontology, 38(4), 282–296. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations