Abstract
By the Siddhantika Period (Aryabhata and Varāhamihira, possibly around AD 550), the position of the aphelion, the nodes (intersection of the orbit of the planet with ecliptic) and the orbital periods of the planets were fairly well determined. Varāhamihira also documented the correct ayanamsha (precession of the equinoxes, the points of intersection of the ecliptic with the celestial equator) of about 0.0141 days per year. Considering this, it is strange that the length of the year was believed to be 365.2584 days as against our presently accepted mean value of 365.2562 days for the sidereal year. This could have been due to one of two reasons: (1) The Earth’s spinning around its axis has slowed down, thereby decreasing the orbital period by 0.0022 days over about 1500 years. Then, any astronomical calculations based on data for more than 4000 years, which might have used the Earth’s rotational period as a unit, have to be re-examined. There appears to be substantial geological evidence consistent with this hypothesis; or, (2) The year might have been determined based on time taken by the Earth to move from aphelion to aphelion (aphelion, mandochcham, is important in astrology). If this was the convention for orbital periods, it is surprising that this information is not recorded nor discussed in relation to the origin of the co-ordinate system, even though we certainly shifted the start of the year from a position near Antares to the current position in Aries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The start of some of the Yugas is believed to have been when certain important conjunctions took place. Both Aryabhatiya and Surya Siddhanta give 3102 BCE as the starting day of ‘Kali Yuga’. According to Abhyankar (2007), the starting point of Kali Yuga coincided with a rare planetary alignment (depicted in the Mohenjo-Daro seals – WIKIPEDIA on Kali Yuga). But there is no evidence to identify the start of various Yugas with planetary alignments.
- 2.
But there is no strong justification for this as-sumption, because of the formation of planets from planetismals.
References (Other Than the Veda and Almanacs Mentioned in the Text)
Abhyankar, K.D., 2007. Pre-Siddhantic Indian Astronomy (A Reappraisal). Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas (I.S.E.R.VE),Hyderabad.
Bartlett, B.C. and Stevenson, D.J., 2016. Analysis of a Precambian resonance-stabilized day length. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 5716–5724.
Bentley, J., 1825. A Historical View of the Hindu Astronomy, From the Earliest Dawn of Science in India to the Present Time. London, Smith, Elder & Co.
Brosche, P., 1982. Tidal friction and the Earth’s rotation. Hvar Observatory Bulletin Supplement, 6, 55–60.
Wu, P., and Peltier, W.R., 1984. Pleistocene deglaciation and the Earth’s rotation – a new analysis. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 76, 753–792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Hindustan Book Agency 2018 and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Narasimha, D. (2019). On the Lenth of the Year After Varāhamihira’s PanchaSiddhantika . In: Orchiston, W., Sule, A., Vahia, M. (eds) The Growth and Development of Astronomy and Astrophysics in India and the Asia-Pacific Region. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 54. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3645-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3645-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3644-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3645-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)