Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings ((ASSSP,volume 54))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

By the Siddhantika Period (Aryabhata and Varāhamihira, possibly around AD 550), the position of the aphelion, the nodes (intersection of the orbit of the planet with ecliptic) and the orbital periods of the planets were fairly well determined. Varāhamihira also documented the correct ayanamsha (precession of the equinoxes, the points of intersection of the ecliptic with the celestial equator) of about 0.0141 days per year. Considering this, it is strange that the length of the year was believed to be 365.2584 days as against our presently accepted mean value of 365.2562 days for the sidereal year. This could have been due to one of two reasons: (1) The Earth’s spinning around its axis has slowed down, thereby decreasing the orbital period by 0.0022 days over about 1500 years. Then, any astronomical calculations based on data for more than 4000 years, which might have used the Earth’s rotational period as a unit, have to be re-examined. There appears to be substantial geological evidence consistent with this hypothesis; or, (2) The year might have been determined based on time taken by the Earth to move from aphelion to aphelion (aphelion, mandochcham, is important in astrology). If this was the convention for orbital periods, it is surprising that this information is not recorded nor discussed in relation to the origin of the co-ordinate system, even though we certainly shifted the start of the year from a position near Antares to the current position in Aries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The start of some of the Yugas is believed to have been when certain important conjunctions took place. Both Aryabhatiya and Surya Siddhanta give 3102 BCE as the starting day of ‘Kali Yuga’. According to Abhyankar (2007), the starting point of Kali Yuga coincided with a rare planetary alignment (depicted in the Mohenjo-Daro seals – WIKIPEDIA on Kali Yuga). But there is no evidence to identify the start of various Yugas with planetary alignments.

  2. 2.

    But there is no strong justification for this as-sumption, because of the formation of planets from planetismals.

References (Other Than the Veda and Almanacs Mentioned in the Text)

  • Abhyankar, K.D., 2007. Pre-Siddhantic Indian Astronomy (A Reappraisal). Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas (I.S.E.R.VE),Hyderabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, B.C. and Stevenson, D.J., 2016. Analysis of a Precambian resonance-stabilized day length. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 5716–5724.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J., 1825. A Historical View of the Hindu Astronomy, From the Earliest Dawn of Science in India to the Present Time. London, Smith, Elder & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosche, P., 1982. Tidal friction and the Earth’s rotation. Hvar Observatory Bulletin Supplement, 6, 55–60.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P., and Peltier, W.R., 1984. Pleistocene deglaciation and the Earth’s rotation – a new analysis. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 76, 753–792.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Narasimha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Hindustan Book Agency 2018 and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Narasimha, D. (2019). On the Lenth of the Year After Varāhamihira’s PanchaSiddhantika . In: Orchiston, W., Sule, A., Vahia, M. (eds) The Growth and Development of Astronomy and Astrophysics in India and the Asia-Pacific Region. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 54. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3645-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics