Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical Social Science and Critical Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Justice Theory and Practice for Social Work

Abstract

This chapter examines critical theory as a way of explaining, contesting and acting upon social injustice. Critical theories, of which there are many, have been a significant source of explanatory power and motivating action for social work. As will be shown, there are a number of different generations and formulations of critical theory. What links these different theories is that they combine explanations of social reality with practical aims for addressing social injustices. The chapter explains what makes critical social science critical, and then outlines Marxist, feminist and postcolonial theory by explaining each position in relation to a theory of false consciousness, theory of crisis, theory of education and a theory of transformative action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ablett, P., & Morley, C. (2016). Towards a history of critical traditions in Australian Social Work. Social Alternatives, 35(4), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agger, B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agger, B. (2006). Critical social theories: An introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. (2010). Recognizing domination: Recognition and power in Honneth’s critical theory. Journal of Power, 3(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540291003630338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K., & O’Boyle, B. (2011). Marx and the alternative to capitalism. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvin, M., Tuck, E., & Morrill, A. (2013). Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1325/ff.2013.0006.

  • Ashcroft, B. (2001). Post-colonial transformation. Florence, US: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Social Workers. (2010). Code of ethics. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, D. (2007). Anti-oppressive social work practice: Fighting for space, fighting for change. In D. Baines & A. Benjamin (Eds.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Building transformative politicized social work. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, U., & Macfarlane, S. (2010). Teaching critical reflection: A tool for transformative learning in social work? Social Work Education, 30(7), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.516429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessarab, D., Green, S., Jones, V., Stratton, K., Young, S., & Zubrzycki, J. (2014). Getting it right: Teaching and learning framework (115 pages). Canberra: Office of Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2005). Critical theory. Retrieved June 23, 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/.

  • Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902945215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capeheart, L., & Milovanovic, D. (2007). Indigenous/postcolonial forms of justice. In Social Justice: Theories, issues and movements (pp. 108–139). New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory. Crow’s Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity in association with Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demos, V., & Segal, M. T. (2006). Introduction. In V. Demos & M. T. Segal (Eds.), Gender and the local-global nexus: Theory, research, and action (pp. vii-xii). Online: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominelli, L. (2002a). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dominelli, L. (2002b). Feminist social work theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, M. G., & Kellner, D. M. (2004). Introduction to part II. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 91–98). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (1990). Radical social casework: Linking theory and practice. In R. Thorpe & J. Petruchenia (Eds.), Social change and social welfare practice (pp. 20–47). Marrickville, New South Wales: Hale & Iremonger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (1993). Radical casework: A theory of practice. St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (2016). Social work: A critical approach to practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galper, J. H. (1975). The politics of social services. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Go, J. (2013). Postcolonial sociology. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., & Webb, S. A. (2009). Critical social work. In M. Gray & S. A. Webb (Eds.), Social work theories and methods (pp. 76–85). London, UK: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1995). Feminisms and the self: The web of identity. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. J. (1999). The future of differences: Truth and method in feminist theory. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, A. (1998). Political ideologies: An introduction (2nd ed.). Houndmills: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D., & Watts, L. (2017). Key concepts and theory in social work. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (2009). A brief introduction to social work theory. Basingstoke, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. (2017). About the ILO. Retrieved August 3, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/lang–en/index.htm.

  • Lake, M. (2003). White man’s country: The trans-national history of a national project. Australian Historical Studies, 34(122), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10314610308596259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, C. (2011). Social work, social justice and human rights: A structural approach to practice. Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, D. (2000a). Poststructuralism. In D. Macey (Ed.), Dictionary of critical theory (p. 309). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, D. (2000b). Subaltern studies. In D. Macey (Ed.), Dictionary of critical theory (p. 367). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. (2017). On the relation between Iris Young’s conception of structures and intersectional approaches to subordination. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2017 CPSA meeting in Toronto, Ontario. Retrieved from https://cpsa.acsp.ca/documents/conference/2017/MacLean.pdf.

  • Macleod, C., & Bhatia, S. (2008). Postcolonialism and psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1844). Estranged labour. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (4th ed., pp. 32–38). Philadephia, USA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1932/2000). Economic & philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Economic-Philosophic-Manuscripts-1844.pdf.

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The manifesto of class struggle. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social theory: Multicultural and classic readings (pp. 39–43). Philadelphia, USA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The communist manifesto. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, T. (2014). Intersectionality as a useful tool: Anti-oppressive social work and critical reflection. Affilia, 29(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109913510659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality: Theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia, 25(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullaly, R. P. (1997). Structural social work: Ideology, theory, and practice (2nd ed.). Toronto, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaly, R. P. (2007). The new structural social work (3rd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaly, R. P., & Keating, E. F. (1991). Similarities, differences and dialectics of radical social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 2(2), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1300/J059v02n02_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, L. (1987). Feminism and Marx: Integrating kinship with the economic. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 16–30). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, B., & Fook, J. (Eds.). (1999). Transforming social work practice. St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, C., Collins, S., & Peacock, G. (1988). Social work and received ideas. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarup, M. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism (2nd ed.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2008). South African social work education: Critical imperatives for social change in the post-apartheid and post-colonial context. International Social Work, 51(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872807088083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1999). To think and act differently: Foucault’s four reciprocal objections to Habermas’ theory. In S. Ashenden & D. Owen (Eds.), Foucault contra Habermas (pp. 90–142). London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2008). On law, democracy and imperialism. In J. Tully (Ed.), Public philosophy in a new key: Volume 2, imperialism and civic freedom (pp. 127–165). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbett, C. (2014). Doing radical social work. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Introduction. In B. van den Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Krieken, R., Habibis, D., Smith, P., Hutchins, B., Martin, G., & Maton, K. (2014). Sociology (5th ed.). Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearing, B. (1996). Gender: The pain and pleasure of difference. Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearing, B., & Marchant, H. (1986). Gender reclaimed: Women in social work. Sydney, New South Wales: Hale & Iremonger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., & Chrisman, L. (1994). Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: An introduction. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory (pp. 1–20). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, Australia

    Lynelle Watts & David Hodgson

Authors
  1. Lynelle Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Hodgson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynelle Watts .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watts, L., Hodgson, D. (2019). Critical Social Science and Critical Theory. In: Social Justice Theory and Practice for Social Work. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3621-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3621-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3620-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3621-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation