Abstract
One of the key aspects of the United States democracy is free and fair elections that allow for a peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next. The 2016 US presidential election stands out due to suspected foreign influence before, during, and after the election. A significant portion of that suspected influence was carried out via social media. In this paper, we look specifically at 3,500 Facebook ads allegedly purchased by the Russian government. These ads were released on May 10, 2018 by the US Congress House Intelligence Committee. We analyzed the ads using natural language processing techniques to determine textual and semantic features associated with the most effective ones. We clustered the ads over time into the various campaigns and the labeled parties associated with them. We also studied the effectiveness of Ads on an individual, campaign and party basis. The most effective ads tend to have less positive sentiment, focus on past events and are more specific and personalized in nature. The more effective campaigns also show such similar characteristics. The campaigns’ duration and promotion of the Ads suggest a desire to sow division rather than sway the election.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–36 (2017)
Badawy, A., Ferrara, E., Lerman, K.: Analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation: the 2016 russian interference twitter campaign. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM ASONAM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (2018)
Baltas, G.: Determinants of internet advertising effectiveness: an empirical study. Int. J. Market Res. 45(4), 1–9 (2003)
Bessi, A., Ferrara, E.: Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21(11) (2016)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=944919.944937
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)
Dave, K.S., Varma, V.: Learning the click-through rate for rare/new ads fromsimilar ads. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 897–898. ACM (2010)
Davis, C.A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: BotOrNot: a system to evaluate social bots. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 273–274. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016)
Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., Quattrociocchi, W.: Mapping social dynamics on facebook: the brexit debate. Soc. Netw. 50, 6–16 (2017)
Dinh, S., Azeb, T., Fortin, F., Mouheb, D., Debbabi, M.: Spam campaign detection, analysis, and investigation. Digit. Invest. 12, S12–S21 (2015)
Ferrara, E.: Manipulation and abuse on social media. ACM SIGWEB Newsl. (Spring) (2015). 4
Ferrara, E.: Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22(8) (2017)
Ferrara, E.: Measuring social spam and the effect of bots on information diffusion in social media. In: Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems. CSS, pp. 229–255. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_13
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59(7), 96–104 (2016)
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Detection of promoted social media campaigns. In: ICWSM, pp. 563–566 (2016)
Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., Wellman, B., Mai, P.H.: Social media and society: introduction to the special issue (2017)
Howard, P.N., Kollanyi, B.: Bots, # strongerin, and # brexit: computational propaganda during the uk-eu referendum (2016)
Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: ICWSM (2014)
Kim, Y.M.: The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook (2018)
Kruczkowski, M., Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz, E., Kozakiewicz, A.: FP-tree and SVM for malicious web campaign detection. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Kosala, R. (eds.) ACIIDS 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9012, pp. 193–201. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15705-4_19
Lazer, D., et al.: Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science 323(5915), 721 (2009)
Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S.J., McClosky,D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014)
McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E.: Combatting misinformation requires recognizing its types and the factors that facilitate its spread and resonance. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6(4), 389–396 (2017)
Metaxas, P.T., Mustafaraj, E.: Social media and the elections. Science 338(6106), 472–473 (2012)
Mikolov, T., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Puhrsch, C., Joulin, A.: Advances in pre-training distributed word representations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (2018)
Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon 29(3), 436–465 (2013)
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIwc 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 71(2001), 2001 (2001)
Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M.R., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. ICWSM 11, 297–304 (2011)
Rehurek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with largecorpora. In: In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges forNLP Frameworks. Citeseer (2010)
Ribeiro, F.N., Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., Gonçalves, M.A., Benevenuto, F.: Sentibench-a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ. Data Sci. 5(1), 1–29 (2016)
Robinson, H., Wysocka, A., Hand, C.: Internet advertising effectiveness, the effect of design on click-through rates for banner ads. Int. J. Adv. 26(4), 527–541 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2007.11073031
Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., Cowley, W.: Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Text Mining: Applications and Theory, pp. 1–20 (2010)
Saher, M., Pathak, J.: Malware and exploit campaign detection system and method, uS Patent App. 14/482,696, 12 March 2015
Stella, M., Ferrara, E., De Domenico, M.: Bots sustain and inflate striking opposition in online social systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07292 (2018)
Sunstein, C.R.: # Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2018)
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C.D., Singer, Y.: Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology-Volume 1, pp. 173–180 (2003)
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Online human-bot interactions: detection, estimation, and characterization (2017)
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Early detection of promoted campaigns on social media. EPJ Data Sci. 6(1), 13 (2017)
Woolley, S.C., Guilbeault, D.R.: Computational propaganda in the united states of America: manufacturing consensus online. Computational Propaganda Research Project, p. 22 (2017)
Acknowledgement
EF is grateful to AFOSR (#FA9550-17-1-0327) for supporting this work. RD carried out this work at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering as part of the INDO - U.S. Science and Technology Forum (IUSSTF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dutt, R., Deb, A., Ferrara, E. (2019). “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign. In: Akoglu, L., Ferrara, E., Deivamani, M., Baeza-Yates, R., Yogesh, P. (eds) Advances in Data Science. ICIIT 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 941. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3582-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3582-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3581-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3582-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)