Skip to main content

Automated Chinese Essay Scoring Based on Multilevel Linguistic Features

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational and Corpus Approaches to Chinese Language Learning

Part of the book series: Chinese Language Learning Sciences ((CLLS))

Abstract

Writing assessments make up an important part of the learning process as one masters the important linguistic skill of writing. However, this process has not been implemented effectively or on a large scale because the task of essay scoring is very time-consuming. The solution to this problem is AES, where machines are used to automatically score essays. In fact, the application of AES to English learning has been successful. Due to differences in linguistic characteristics, a redesign is needed before AES can be applied to Chinese learning. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce ACES, an automated system for scoring Chinese essays, and explain the basic framework, design principles, and scoring accuracy of the system. Unlike some end-to-end AES systems, ACES’ basic framework is designed to provide more interpretative features. The experimental results show that the performance of the ACES system is stable and reliable, and on par with other commercial English AES systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated scoring with e-raterV.2. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, S. T., & Shi, A. W. (2002). A comparative study of figures of speech between Chinese and English. Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University,18(1), 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow M., Braden-Harder, L., & Harris, M. D. (1998). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 206–210). Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. G. (2006). Contrastive study of writing and rhetoric in English and Chinese. Shanghai, China: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang. T. H. (2015). The development of Chinese word segmentation tool for educational text. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information (pp. 179–182). Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang. T. H., Chen, H. C., & Yang, C. H. (2015). Introduction to a proofreading tool for Chinese spelling check task of SIGHAN-8. In Proceedings of the 8th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing (pp. 50–55). Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., & Lee, C. H. (2003). Automatic Chinese unknown word extraction using small-corpus-based method. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Natural language processing and knowledge engineering (pp. 459–464). Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., & Lee, C. H. (2009). Automatic Chinese essay scoring using connections between concepts in paragraphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Asian Language Processing (pp. 265–268). Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., Lee, C. H., & Tam, H. P. (2007a). On issues of feature extraction in Chinese automatic essay scoring system. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 545–547). Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., Lee, C. H., & Tam, H. P. (2007b). On developing techniques for automated Chinese essay scoring: A case in ACES system. In Proceedings of the Forum for Educational Evaluation in East Asia (pp. 151–152). Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., Lee, C. H., Tsai, P. Y., & Tam, H. P. (2009). Automated essay scoring using set of literary sememes. Information: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. H., Liu, C. L., Su, S. Y., & Sung, Y. T. (2014). Integrating various features to grade students’ writings based on improved multivariate Bernoulli model. Information: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. J., Luo, C. C., Chang, M. C., Chen, F. Y., Chen, C. J., Huang, C. R., et al. (2003). Sinica Treebank. In A. Abeillé (Ed.), Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora (pp. 231–248). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Z., & Dong, Q. (2003). HowNet—A hybrid language and knowledge resource. In Proceedings of International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (pp. 820–824). Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. M. (2003). IntelliMetric: From here to validity. In M. D. Shermis & J. C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 71–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, C. Y. (2002). A syntactic comparison and transformation between English and Chinese. Journal of Yancheng Teachers College,22(2), 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning,16(1–2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. C. (2001). Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 282–289). Williamstown, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. N. (1999). Contrastive studies of figures of speech in English and Chinese. Fuzhou, China: Fujian People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, X. L., & Zeng, K. (2001). Heterogeneity and homogeneity of sentence structure in English and Chinese. Journal of Shenyang University,12(1), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. J. (1999). A contrastive study of discourse structure in English and Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages,86(4), 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, X., Ke, D., Chen, Z., & Xu, B. (2010). Automated Chinese essay scoring using vector space models. In Proceedings of the 4th International Universal Communication Symposium (pp. 149–153). Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramineni, C., Trapani, C. S., Williamson, D. M., Davey, T., & Bridgeman, B. (2012). Evaluation of the e‐rater® scoring engine for the GRE® issue and argument prompts (ETS RR–12-02). https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-12-02.pdf. Accessed August 31, 2017.

  • Rudner, L. M., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An evaluation of IntelliMetric™ essay scoring system. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment,4(4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudner, L. M., & Liang, T. (2002). Automated essay scoring using Bayes’ theorem. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment,1(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000). Contrastive discourse in Chinese and English: A critical appraisal. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Lin, W. C., Dyson, S. B., Chang, K. E., & Chen, Y. C. (2015). Leveling L2 texts through readability: Combining multilevel linguistic features with the CEFR. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, T. H., Lin, W. C., Hsieh, K. S., & Chang, K. E. (2016). CRIE: An automated analyzer for Chinese texts. Behavior Research Methods,48(4), 1238–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X. H. (1997). Enhancing English writing ability by comparing the difference of organization in paragraphs between English and Chinese. Journal of Nanchang Vocation-technical Teachers College,4, 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, under the grant 107-2511-H-003 -022 -MY3; 104-2511-S-003 -018 -MY3; 107-2511-H-992-001-MY3; 104-2511-S-151-001-MY3, and the University Sprout Project―Chinese Language and Technology Center of National Taiwan Normal University, sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao-Hsing Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chang, TH., Sung, YT. (2019). Automated Chinese Essay Scoring Based on Multilevel Linguistic Features. In: Lu, X., Chen, B. (eds) Computational and Corpus Approaches to Chinese Language Learning. Chinese Language Learning Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3570-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3570-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3569-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3570-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics