Abstract
This chapter involves introducing the ontological dimension of higher education with Chinese characteristics. The origins and definitions of ontology and the categories and types of ontology contribute to illustrate the core idea of ontology. The upper ontological dimension, domain ontological dimension, interface ontological dimension, and process ontological dimension of higher education with Chinese characteristics are proposed and illustrated to conceptualize and contextualize the framework of ontological dimensions of higher education with Chinese higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ameriks, K. (1992). The critique of metaphysics: Kant and traditional ontology. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques.
Amini, M. (2008). Consciousness and the alleged failure of analytic philolosophy. Philosophical Frontiers: A Journal of Emerging Thought, 1, 59–68.
Balcerowicz, P. (2016). Siddhasena Mahāmati and Akalaṅka Bhaṭṭa: A revolution in Jaina epistemology. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(5), 993–1039.
Buchdahl, G. (1986). Metaphysical and internal realism: The relations between ontology and methodology in Kant’s philosophy of science. Studies in Logic & the Foundations of Mathematics, 114, 623–641.
Crowther, P. (1985). Fundamental ontology and transcendent beauty: An approach to Kant’s aesthetics. Kant-Studien, 76(1–4), 55–71.
Esposito, C. (2013). Kant and the problem of modern ontology.
Gasparyan, D. (2014). Deterministic and nondeterministic approaches in dualistic and non-dualistic ontology: From Kant toward sartre. Ideas and Ideals, 1(4), 62–71.
Goodwin, B. (2001). The philosophy of utopia. F. Cass.
Korner, S., & Gram, M. S. (1971). Kant, ontology, and the a priori. Société Française De Philosophie Bulletin, 80(1), 129.
Laywine, A., & Watkins, E. (1992). The critique of metaphysics: Kant and traditional ontology. Vivo, 24(2), 125–129.
Lolordo, A. (2008). Locke’s problem concerning perceptual error. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77(3), 705–724.
Lolordo, A. (2013). Three problems in Locke’s ontology of substance and mode. In Contemporary perspectives on early modern philosophy. Netherlands: Springer.
Maitland, J. (1982). An ontology of appreciation: Kant’s aesthetics and the problem of metaphysics. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 13(1), 45–68.
Mcwherter, D. (2015). Debate: Kant, ontology and empirical realism: Response to assiter. Journal of Critical Realism, 14(5), 518–529.
Owen, H. (2008). Contemporary perspectives on early modern philosophy. Studies in History & Philosophy of Science, 29.
Paek, C. H. (2005). Kant’s theory of transcendental truth as ontology. Kant-Studien, 96(2), 147–160.
Perez, D. O. (2016). Ontology, metaphysics and criticism as transcendental semantics as of Kant. Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 28(44), 459–488.
Pye, E. T. (1989). The epistemic constraints on an intelligible ontology.
Serck-Hanssen, C. (2015). Towards fundamental ontology: Heidegger’s phenomenological reading of Kant. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(2), 1–19.
Silveira, S. J. P. D. (2015). Adorno’s critique of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology based on Heidegger’s interpretation of Kant, Veritas, 60.
Unah, J. (1997). Heidegger: Through Kant to fundamental ontology. Kant: Miscellaneous.
Zhi-Ping, Y. U. (2004). Termination, turning and deconstruction of intellectual ontology—From Kant, Heidegger to Derrida. Shanghai: Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao.
Zou, S. P., & Jia-Ni, J. I. (2014). A distinction between the existential ontology and epistemology: The way from Kant to phenomenology-hermeneutics revisited. Jilin: University Journal Social Sciences Edition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, J., Zhu, X. (2019). Introduction on Ontological Dimension of Higher Education with Chinese Characteristics. In: Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Higher Education with Chinese Characteristics. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3474-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3474-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3473-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3474-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)