Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Training Using Cadavers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endourology Progress
  • 529 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical education is the fundamentals of medicine and warrants experience transfer from generations to generation to achieve a better disease management. Laparoscopic procedure requires a steep learning curve compared to conventional open procedures due to two-dimensional vision, lack of tactile sensation and limited working space. The training curriculum in laparoscopic procedures includes not only didactic lectures but also hand-on surgical training lab. The application of computerized simulators, tissue analogue simulators and cadavers is proved to be efficient for surgical skills training in laparoscopy. The training in nontechnical surgical skills is found to have positive impact on surgical training, especially in interpersonal communication and team work during emergency scenarios in the operating room. This chapter will discuss the concept on surgical training, training curriculum design, the application of simulators in laparoscopic training and nontechnical training in laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alemozaffar M, Narayanan R, Percy A, et al. Validation of a novel, tissue-based simulator for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28:995–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B, et al. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. BJU Int. 2010;106:850–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowriappa A, Raza SJ, Fazili A, et al. Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2015;115:336–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corica FA, Boker JR, Chou DS, et al. Short-term impact of a laparosocpic “mini-residency” experience on postgraduate urologists’ practice patterns. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:692–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, Allen C, et al. Design and implementation of a proficiency-based, structured endoscopy course for medical students applying for a surgical specialty. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013;4:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giger U, Fresard I, Hafliger A, et al. Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:901–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion RM. On trinitarian doctrines of validity. Prof Psychol. 1980;11:385–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsted SW. The training of the surgeon. Bull John Hopkins Hosp. 1904;15:267–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden RB. Face validity. In: Weiner IB, Craighead WE, editors. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. 4th ed. NJ: Wiley; 2010. p. 637–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model. BJU Int. 2012;110:870–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L, et al. Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2015;194:520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imakuma ES, Ussami EY, Meyer A. Laparoscopic training model using fresh human cadavers without the establishment of pneumoperitoneum. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12:190–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Liu M, Chen J, et al. Construct validity of the chicken crop model in the simulation of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2013;27:1032–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SG, Cho S, Kang SH, et al. The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity. Urology. 2014;84:345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ. 2003;27:267–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laguna MP, Hatzinger M, Rassweiler J. Simulators and endourological training. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA, et al. Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy suture. J Endourol. 2006;20:69–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28:563–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Mucksavage P, McDougall EM. Simulating laparoscopic renal hilar vessel injuries: preliminary evaluation of a novel surgical training model for residents. J Endourol. 2012a;26:393–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Canales C, et al. High fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study on technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management. J Urol. 2012b;187:1385–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda T, McDougall EM, Ono Y, et al. Positive correlation between motion analysis data on the LapMentor virtual reality surgical simulator and the results from videotape assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries. J Endourol. 2012;26:1506–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poniatowski LH, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, et al. Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2014;28:393–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh R, Chatterjee S, Chawla A, et al. Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2012;187:1861–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAGES. Guidelines for granting of privileges for laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic general surgery. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc. 1998;12:379–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satava RM. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2001;25:1484–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Horgan A. Comparison of fresh-frozen cadaver and high-fidelity virtual reality simulators as methods of laparoscopic training. World J Surg. 2012;36:1732–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxer O, Gettman MT, Napper CA, et al. The impact of intensive laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents. J Urol. 2001;166:1658–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tunitsky E, Murphy A, Barber MD, et al. Development and validation of a ureteral anastomosis simulation model for surgical training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19:346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri M. Laparoscopic surgical education. J Minim Invasive Surg Sci. 2013;2:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hsueh, T.Y. (2019). Laparoscopic Training Using Cadavers. In: Chan, Ey., Matsuda, T. (eds) Endourology Progress. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3465-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3465-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3464-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3465-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics