Skip to main content

Abstract

The existing evaluation methods of patent quality take expert scoring as the principal thing. Each expert is required to score all the indexes and to assign the corresponding weight according to the relative importance of the index. But index system generally involves multiple indicators in different fields. Experts can not make accurate evaluation of indicators beyond their research fields, and fuzzy indicators also make experts hesitate and wander between several evaluation values. Hesitant fuzzy soft sets can more accurately describe the fuzzy nature of things, have no restrictions on optional objects, and take full account of the degree of hesitation of expert decision making. Accordingly, this paper proposes a evaluation model of patent quality based on hesitant fuzzy soft sets and gives specific evaluation steps.

Funded projects: 1. A quality monitoring economic model based on feedforward adjustment and its performance evaluation (172102210078); 2. Economic model of self correlation process quality monitoring and its performance evaluation (17A630069); 3. Multiple objective optimization design based on the economic statistics of PLD process quality control (71672209); 4. The smart phone surface of defect monitoring and real time quality diagnosis of manufacturing process (U1604262).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X.L. Wan, X.Z. Zhu, Status and trends of patent quality indicator research in international perspective. J. Intell. 28(7), 49–54 (2009). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y.T. Zhang, W.C. Du, M.S. Jia et al., Research on the evaluation of enterprise patents quality based on the adaptive analytic hierarchy process. Libr. Inf. Serv. 7, 110–115 (2016). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Narin, Patent as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics 34(3), 489–496 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Q.H. Li, Y. Liu, S.Z. Wu, et al., The overview and hierarchical analysis of the evaluation index of patent value. Stud. Sci. Sci. 25(2), 281–286 (2007). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Liu, J.P. Jing, J. Yu, Analysis on the definition and composition factor of patent quality in intellectual property rights. Inf. Sci. 11, 1710–1713 (2009). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Zhang, Y.J. Hu, A study on the patent evaluation method without market bench marking: theoretical basis, empirical research and future challenges. Soft Sci. 24(9), 142–144 (2010). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Feng, J.Z. Zhou, Y. Du, Research on quality evaluation index system of single patent. Sci. Technol. Manag. Res. 32(23), 166–170 (2012). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.M. Ren, Y.H. Chen, B. Jiang et al., Research on evaluation index system of patent pledge financing for small and medium sized enterprises. J. Shandong Agric. Univ. (Social Science Edition) 4, 55–60 (2012). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. China Technology Exchange Organization Writing, China. Operation manual of the patent value analysis index system. Intellectual Property Press, 2012. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.V. Babitha, S.J. John, Hesitant fuzzy soft sets. J. New Results Sci. 3, 98–107 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Mao, Economic significance and practical use of patent indicators. Intellect. Prop. 07, 72–79 (2015). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Jiang, The cornerstone of strict intellectual property protection: good patent authorization and the quality of the right. Intellect. Prop. 12, 65–70 (2016). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. X.Q. Zhou, Soft set and hesitant fuzzy set with their application in decision making. Hunan University (2014). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Xu, M. Xia, Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 181(11), 2128–2138 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Xu, M. Xia, On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26(5), 410–425 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, L., Li, Q., Yu, Jl. (2019). Patent Quality Evaluation Model Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Set. In: Huang, G., Chien, CF., Dou, R. (eds) Proceeding of the 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2018. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3402-3_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics