Abstract
The rent term premium for leases that can be cancelled by the lessee is analyzed. A model for the lessor’s trade-off between leasing costs and the cost of cancellation options based on the recognition that many leases are cancellable by lessees and that lease markets involve significant transaction costs is developed. It is shown that, regardless of the expected future rents , the rent term structure is upward-sloping when there is no leasing cost but U-shaped when the lessor faces moderate leasing costs. Residential leases in Japan, which are all cancellable by tenants, exhibit a term structure consistent with our calibrated model. This result provides a new insight into the lessor’s optimal choice of rents and the equilibrium rent term premium .
This chapter is adapted from Yoshida et al. (2016), Springer Nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Real Estate Roundtable, 2011 Annual Report. Available at http://www.rer.org, accessed October 24, 2012.
- 2.
The Equipment Leasing and Finance Foundation, Economic Impacts of the Proposed Changes to Lease Accounting Standards, December 12, 2011. Available at http://www.leasefoundation.org, accessed October 24, 2012.
- 3.
This type of lease contract was prevalent before 1941 but was eliminated to prevent landlords from evicting incumbent tenants and circumventing rent control during World War II (Survey of New Form of Residence Associated with Fixed-Term Lease Contracts, Housing Research and Advancement Foundation of Japan, March 2015).
- 4.
This requirement is specified by Article 28 of the Tenure Law, known as Shakuchi-Shakka-Hou in Japan.
- 5.
- 6.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, 2013FY Housing Market Survey (Jutaku Shijo Doko Chosa).
- 7.
The stochastic discount factor is derived from the first-order condition for the lessor’s utility maximization problem given the lessor’s wealth portfolio and consumption stream.
- 8.
Source: Recruit Residential Price Index, January 14, 2013, accessed October 31, 2014. Available at http://www.jresearch.net/house/jresearch/rrpi/index.html.
- 9.
Rotten structures are excluded in this calculation.
- 10.
We use lease contracts that are shorter than or equal to 5 years because the number of leases longer than 5 years is small and their tenant characteristics differ significantly from the average characteristics.
- 11.
This empirical strategy is equivalent to pooling both types of leases and including interaction terms with a fixed-lease dummy by treating ordinary leases as a reference group.
- 12.
The average of the 2003 and 2008 national vacancy rates for rental housing is 19%.
- 13.
The estimated term structures exhibit the same shapes based on Models (b), (c), or (d).
- 14.
The mean values are 16.4 and 15.1 years for building age and 9.5 and 9.8 min for the time to the nearest station in low- and high-vacancy areas, respectively.
References
Agarwal, S., Ambrose, B. W., Huang, H., & Yildirim, Y. (2011). The term structure of lease rates with endogenous default triggers and tenant capital structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46, 553–584.
Ambrose, B. W., & Yildirim, Y. (2008). Credit risk and the term structure of lease rates: A reduced form approach. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 37, 281–298.
Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 2931–2943.
Blume, M. E., & Keim, D. B. (1988). The valuation of callable bonds. Working paper 14–89, Rodney White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School.
Bond, S., Loizou, P., & McAllister, P. (2008). Lease maturity and initial rent: Is there a term structure for UK commercial property leases? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36, 451–469.
Chang, C. C., Ho, H. W., Huang, H., & Yildrim, Y. (2012). Simultaneous implication of credit risk and embedded options in lease contracts. Working paper.
Clapham, E., & Gunnelin, A. (2003). Rental expectations and the term structure of lease rates. Real Estate Economics, 31, 647–670.
Copeland, T. E., & Weston, J. F. (1982). A note on the evaluation of cancellable operating leases. Financial Management, 11, 60–67.
Devos, E., Dhillon, U., Jagannathan, M., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2012). Why are firms unlevered? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18, 664–682.
Eisfeldt, A. L., & Rampini, A. A. (2009). Leasing, ability to repossess, and debt capacity. Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1621–1657.
Follain, J. R., Scott, L. O., & Yang, T. L. (1992). Microfoundations of a mortgage prepayment function. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 5, 197–217.
Geltner, D. M., Miller, N. G., Clayton, J., & Eichholtz, P. (2014). Commercial real estate analysis and investments (3rd ed.). OnCourse Learning.
Giaccotto, C., Goldberg, G. M., & Hegde, S. P. (2007). The value of embedded real options: Evidence from consumer automobile lease contracts. Journal of Finance, 62, 411–445.
Graham, J. R., Lemmon, M. L., & Schallheim, J. S. (1998). Debt, leases, taxes, and the endogeneity of corporate tax status. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 131–162.
Grenadier, S. R. (1995). Valuing lease contracts: A real-options approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 297–331.
Grenadier, S. R. (2005). An equilibrium analysis of real estate leases. Journal of Business, 78, 1173–1214.
Gunnelin, A., & Soderberg, B. (2003). Term structures in the office rental market in Stockholm. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 26, 241–265.
Gurkaynak, R. S., & Wright, J. H. (2012). Macroeconomics and the term structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 331–367.
Ho, S. S. M., Lam, K. C. K., & Sami, H. (2004). The investment opportunity set, director ownership, and corporate policies: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 383–408.
Iwata, S. (2002). The Japanese tenant protection law and asymmetric information on tenure length. Journal of Housing Economics, 11, 125–151.
McConnell, J. J., & Schallheim, J. S. (1983). Valuation of asset leasing contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 237–261.
Miceli, T. J., & Sirmans, C. F. (1999). Tenant turnover, rental contracts, and self-selection. Journal of Housing Economics, 8, 301–311.
Mooradian, R. M., & Yang, S. X. (2000). Cancellation strategies in commercial real estate leasing. Real Estate Economics, 28, 65–88.
Rubinstein, M. (1974). An aggregation theorem for securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 1(3), 225–244.
Schallheim, J. S., & McConnell, J. J. (1985). A model for the determination of “Fair” premiums on lease cancellation insurance policies. Journal of Finance, 40, 1439–1457.
Seko, M., & Sumita, K. (2007). Japanese housing tenure choice and welfare implications after the revision of the tenant protection law. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35, 357–383.
Sharpe, S. A., & Nguyen, H. H. (1995). Capital-market imperfections and the incentive to lease. Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 271–294.
Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2009). An empirical test of a contingent claims lease valuation model. Journal of Real Estate Research, 31, 1–26.
Yoshida, J., Seko, M., & Sumita, K. (2016). The rent term premium for cancellable leases. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 52(4), 480–511.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Relative Rent Regression by the Least Absolute Deviation Method
Appendix: Relative Rent Regression by the Least Absolute Deviation Method
Table 7.7 presents an estimation result of the relative rent of a fixed-term lease rate relative to a comparable ordinary lease rate by the least absolute deviation method.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seko, M. (2019). The Term Premium of Cancellable Lease Rates. In: Housing Markets and Household Behavior in Japan. Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3369-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3369-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3368-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3369-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)