Skip to main content

Teaching Out-of-Field Internationally

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter presents vignettes from six countries regarding the phenomenon of Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) or as it is often known teaching out-of-field. The vignettes provide an overview of the education system and policies and practices relating to teacher education, certification, recruitment and assignment to subjects or year levels. They also provide insights into how teaching out-of-field is conceptualised, if or how it is officially reported, its extent and importantly, any local, state or national responses to teaching out-of-field. The six countries included are Australia, Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom, the USA and Indonesia. These countries have been selected because they have the most available published research relating to teaching out-of-field. The vignettes have been written by researchers and academics from each country who is working in the field. The vignettes highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon as it occurs in different contexts including both commonalities and differences. The chapter concludes with an overview of the occurrence of teaching out-of-field from an international perspective and provides a synthesis of the key insights gleaned from the vignettes. These insights are further elaborated in subsequent chapters to facilitate a deeper understanding of the phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Minor study is defined as two years of tertiary study equivalent to two units of first year study followed by two units of second year study.

References

Ireland

  • Hyland, A. (2012). A Review of the Structure of Initial Teacher Education Provision in Ireland: Background Paper for the International Review Team, University College Cork, May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolahan, J. (2015). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: Country background report for Ireland. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, J., Shiel, G., Oldham, E., & Sofroniou, N. (2004). A survey of mathematics teachers in Ireland. The Irish Journal of Education, 35, 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2009). Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: An analysis of the Irish context. Research report: National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. ISBN 1-905952-23-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Irish Academy Committee of Mathematical Sciences & Chemical & Physical Sciences. (2008). Response to the proposal to offer bonus points for maths. Dublin: RIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teaching Council. (2011). Initial Teacher Education: Criteria and Guidelines for Programme Providers. Retrieved from http://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/Publications/Registration/Documents/Curricular-Subject-Requirments-after-January-2017.pdf

UK

USA

  • Achieve. (2012). Next generation of science standards. Washington, DC: Achieve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1998). The problem of out-of-field teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American Secondary Schools. Educational Research, 28(2), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Weeks, C. B., Hill, K., & Raven, S. (2013). Science teacher knowledge: The impact of in and out-of-field instruction. San Francisco, CA: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Teacher Quality. (2010). The all-purpose science teacher: An analysis of loopholes in state requirements for high school science teachers. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Australia

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Carlton South: Education Services Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, B., Watson, K., Petocz, P., & Maher, M. (2013). Retaining mathematics and science teachers in rural and remote schools. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(3), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J., & Hobbs, L. (2015). Researching with in-service teachers teaching “out-of-field”. Paper presented Paper presented to the Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Education, Deakin University Melbourne 25–26 November 2015. Online proceedings paper available https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/622558/Kenny-Hobbs-2015.pdf

  • Mayer, D., Doecke, B., Ho, P., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., Moss, J., North, J., Walker-Gibbs, B., & Hodder, P. (2014). Longitudinal teacher education and workforce study (Final Report, November, 2013). Canberra: Department of Education, Commonwealth of Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/ltews_main_report.pdf

  • Vale, C., Hobbs, L., & Speldewinde, C. (submitted). The problem of out-of-field teaching: A critical lens on policy in Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in secondary schools. Policy Insights, Issue 6. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Indonesia

Germany

  • Bosse, M. (2016). Mathematik fachfremd unterrichten. Zur Professionaliät fachbezogner Lehrer-Identität. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 49–62). NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2016). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Deutsch- und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In P. Stanat, K. Böhme, S. Schipolowski, & N. Haag (Eds.), IQB-Bildungstrend: Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im zweiten Ländervergleich (pp. 481–501). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klusmann, U., & Richter, D. (2014). Beanspruchungserleben von Lehrkräften und Schülerleistung: Eine Analyse des IQB-Ländervergleichs in der Primarstufe. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60, 202–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (MSW) (2016). Das Schulwesen in Nordrhein-Westfalen aus quantitativer Sicht 2015/16. Statistische Übersicht 391. Düsseldorf: MSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, R. (2017). Spezialisten oder Generalisten? Eine Betrachtung der Fachausbildung von Grundschullehrerinnen und -lehrern in Deutschland. In M. Radhoff & S. Wieckert (Eds.), Die Grundschule im Wandel der Zeit (in press). Dr. Kovač: Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D., Kuhl, P., Reimers, H., & Pant, H. A. (2012). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Lehrkräften in der Primarstufe. In P. Stanat, H. A. Pant, K. Böhme, & D. Richter (Eds.), Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik. Ergebnisse des IQB-Ländervergleichs 2011 (pp. 237–250). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D., Kuhl, P., Haag, N., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftslehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In H. A. Pant, P. Stanat, U. Schroeders, A. Roppelt, T. Siegle, & C. Pöhlmann (Eds.), IQB-Ländervergleich 2012. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I (pp. 367–390). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified Math Teachers or Out-of-field teaching in Mathematics – A Neglectable Field of Action? In W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferro, & K. Maaß (Eds.), Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 196–206). Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Price .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Price, A. et al. (2019). Teaching Out-of-Field Internationally. In: Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3365-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3366-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics