Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remaking Sustainable Urbanism
  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the rising eco-city paradigm worldwide and the increasing importance of space and scale in global urban governance. The aims of the book are explained as exposing and reflecting on the implications for policy and practice of re-making eco-urbanism under the transformational trends of economic decentralization and market reform in China. It aims to situate the eco-city movement in broader social contexts, particularly focusing on how the spatial relationships condition practice at various levels; and how the movement is also restructuring spatial relations in various contexts. The structure of the book is then introduced, with a brief summary of each chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addie, J.-P.D. 2013. Metropolitics in Motion: The Dynamics of Transportation and State Reterritorialization in the Chicago and Toronto City-Regions. Urban Geography 34 (2): 188–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. 2010. Powerful City Networks: More Than Connections, Less Than Domination and Control. Urban Studies 47 (13): 2895–2911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anttiroiko, A.-V. 2015. City Branding as a Response to Global Intercity Competition. Growth and Change 46 (2): 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahmbhatt, M. 2013. Criticizing Green Stimulus. WIREs Climate Change 5 (1): 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. 2000. The Urban Question as a Scale Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (20): 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., and M. Betsill. 2005. Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the ‘Urban’ Politics of Climate Change. Environmental Politics 14 (1): 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carprotti, F. 2014. Eco-Urbanism and the Eco-City, or, Denying the Right to the City? Antipode 46 (5): 1285–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprotti, F., and Z. Gong. 2018. Challenging the Eco-City. In Sustainable Cities in Asia, vol. 161 (174), 161–174. Routledge in Association with GSE Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K.R. 1998. Spaces of Dependence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics. Political Geography 17 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 2012. “A World Class City of Your Own!”: Civic Governmentality in Chennai, India. Antipode 44 (4): 1143–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., and X. Zhang. 2017. Trajectory of Urban Sustainability Concepts: A 35-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Cities 60: 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 2002. Global City-Regions in the Twenty-First Century. In Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, ed. A.J. Scott, 59–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A.M., and H. Lee. 2015. The Paradox of the Sustainable City: Definitions and Examples. Environment, Development and Sustainability 17: 1267–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Social Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, M. 2006. Spatial Rationalities: Order, Environment, Evolution and Government. Social & Cultural Geography 7 (5): 771–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.M. 2012. Urban Geographies I: Still Thinking Cities Relationally. Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. 1989. The Politics of Urban Planning. New York: Paragon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joss, S. 2011. Eco-city Governance: A Case Study of Treasure Island and Sonoma Mountain Village. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 13 (4): 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., R. Wang, J. Paulussen, and X. Liu. 2005. Comprehensive Concept Planning of Urban Greening Based on Ecological Principles: A Case Study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 72 (4): 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. 2011. Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2010. Relationality/Territoriality: Toward a Conceptualization of Cities in the World. Geoforum 41 (2): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olds, K. 2002. Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. 2009. Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, G. 2008. The Conflicting Logics of Cross-Border Reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography 27 (4): 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pow, C.P., and H. Neo. 2013. Seeing Red Over Green: Contesting Urban Sustainabilities in China. Urban Studies 50 (11): 2256–2274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Register, R. 1987. Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. 1876. Hygeia: A City of Health. London: Macmillan (Reprinted 1985. New York: Garland Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberston, R. 1995. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity. Global Modernities 2: 5–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. 2009. The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory. Regional Studies 43 (6): 819–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. 2011. Urbanisms, Worlding Practices and the Theory of Planning. Planning Theory 10 (1): 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A.J. (ed.). 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatkin, G. 2011. Planning Privatopolis: Representation and Contestation in the Development of Urban Integrated Mega-Projects. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. 2007. Scale, State and the City: Urban Transformation in Post-reform China. Habitat International 31: 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E. 2002. The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality. Economic Geography 78 (3): 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H., A. Dastur, S. Moffat, N. Yabuki, and H. Maruyama. 2010. Ecological Cities as Economic Cities. Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither Global Nor Local: ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of Scale. In Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, ed. K. Cox, 138–166. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. 1997. Is the United Kingdom Big Enough for Both London and England? Environment and Planning A 29: 766–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., S. Wu, and S. Li. 2017. Urban Metabolism of Three Cities in Jing-Jin-Ji Urban Agglomeration, China: Using the MuSIASEM Approach. Sustainability 9 (8): 1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. 2006. “Policies in Motion”, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans-Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (1): 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • While, A., A.E.G. Jonas, and D. Gibbs. 2004. The Environment and the Entrepreneurial City: Searching for the Urban ‘Sustainability Fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (3): 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T.C., and R. Liu. 2017. Developmental Urbanism, City Image Branding and the “Right to the City” in Transitional China. Urban Policy and Research 35 (2): 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A.G.O., and F.L. Wu. 1999. The Urban Planning System in China. Progress in Planning 51 (3): 165–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This edited book was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71834005, 71673232).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoling Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X. (2019). Introduction. In: Zhang, X. (eds) Remaking Sustainable Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3350-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics