Skip to main content

Addressing Feelings of Relative Deprivation of Muslim Minority for Inclusive Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws from the findings of studies done in the Indian context on Hindu and Muslim intergroup relations. It specifically considers the theory of ‘relative deprivation’ in understanding various aspects of intergroup relations from feelings of injustice to intergroup attitudes to conflict resolution strategies to engaging in action for the betterment of one’s owngroup situation. Social development becomes meaningless if there is no peace, harmony and co-existence in society due to perceived injustice and a sense of exclusion. Policy implications for inclusive development have also been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abeles, R. P. (1976). Relative deprivation, rising expectations and Black militancy. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. (2017). Police force of India’s capital city is the least democratic in composition. Special report in Caravan, November 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvi, S. (2010). Attribution of responsibility for terror attacks: Role of group membership, situational and individual level factors. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Masters degree in Psychology, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, M. (1981). Fraternalistic relative deprivation and styles of conflict resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Griffeth, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Hom, P. W. (1997). Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1208–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlken, A. J., & Sergenti, E. F. (2010). Economic growth and ethnic violence: An empirical investigation on Hindu-Muslim riots in India. Journal of Peace Research, 47(5), 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Yuan, H. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., Shead, N., & Hodgins, D. C. (2008). Gambling as a search for justice: Examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1514–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S. (2005). Effects of fraternal and egoistic relative deprivation on collective and individual behavioural and affective responses. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Masters degree in Psychology, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRidder, R, Schruijer, S. G. L. & Tripathi, R. C. (Eds.). (1992). Norm violation as a precipitating factorof negative intergroup relations. In R. DeRidder & R. C. Tripathi (Eds.), Norm violation and intergroup relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, E. S. K., Kumar, R., & Tripathi, R. C. (1992). The communal cauldron: Relations between Hindus and Muslims in India and their reactions to norm violations. In R. DeRidder & R. C. Tripathi (Eds.), Norm violation and intergroup relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world: The paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements., 16(3), 433–448. (published online).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2005). Some studies on relative deprivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1998). The inclusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, H. (2017). Public goods, exclusion and 25 years of economic reforms: A blotted balance sheet. In India exclusion report 2016 (pp. 1–30). New Delhi: Yoda Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, N. (1980). Relative deprivation and attribution of blame in communal riots. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (2012). More than a feeling: Discreet emotions mediate the relationship between relative deprivation and reaction to workplace furloughs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P. (2015). Role of attribution and emotion in predicting responses to relative deprivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2002). Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key psychological concept. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 351–373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2016). In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, G., & Satish, M. (2017). Exclusion from access to legal justice. In India exclusion report 2016 (pp. 127–158). New Delhi: Yoda Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachar, R. (2006). Social, economic and educational status of muslim community of India: A report. Ministry of Minority Affairs. Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, Z. (2016, December 26). Ten years after Sachar report. The Indian Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. (2012). Inclusive development paradigm in India: A post Sachar perspective (USIPI occasional paper no 1). New Delhi: US-India Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (2014). Relative deprivation: How subjective experiences of inequality influence social behaviour and health. Policy Insights from Behavioural and Brain Sciences., 1(1), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialoseiwicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). Studies in social psychology in World War II: The American soldier. Vol I, Adjustment during army life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in social psychology of intergroup relations. Salt Lake City: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, R. C., Ghosh, E. S. K., & Kumar, R. (2014). The Hindu-Muslim divide: Building sustainable bridges. In R. C. Tripathi & Y. Sinha (Eds.), Psychology, development and social policy (pp. 257–284). New Delhi: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, R. C., & Srivastava, R. (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Declaration. (1995). Copenhagen declaration on social development in world summit on social development, 14th March, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusive education. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanneman, R. D., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation. Race, 13, 461–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoogah, D. B. (2010). Why should I be left behind? Employees’ perceived relative deprivation and participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 95, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, R. (2019). Addressing Feelings of Relative Deprivation of Muslim Minority for Inclusive Development. In: Pandey, J., Kumar, R., Thapa, K. (eds) Psychological Perspectives on Diversity and Social Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3341-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics