Iterative Sharpening of Digital Images

  • B. Sravankumar
  • Chunduru Anilkumar
  • Sathishkumar Easwaramoorthy
  • Somula RamasubbareddyEmail author
  • K. Govinda
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 862)


The fundamental point of image processing is about upgrading the quality and visual look of the picture, which can viably enhance the impression of data from pictures. Numerous pictures like medicinal pictures, satellite, flying pictures, and furthermore genuine photos experience the ill effects of poor and awful complexity and commotion. It is important to upgrade the differentiation and expel the clamor to build picture quality, thus picture improvement is an essential field to think about as it has a considerable measure of uses like in the therapeutic field, unique mark upgrade, signature protecting and so forth as appeared in this paper. Picture Enhancement is comprehensively ordered in two sections: Pixel-Based Enhancement and Enhancement based on Frequency. In Pixel-Based Enhancement, there are two sections: Sharpening and Smoothening. This report just demonstrates a Sharpening Method for Spatial Domain Enhancement.


Intrusion detection system (IDS) Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) Intrusion prevention system (IPS) Network behavior analysis (NBA) 


  1. 1.
    B. Masschaele, M. Dierick, L. Van Hoorebeke, P. Jacobs, J. Vlassenbroeck, V. Cnudde, Neutron CT enhancement by iterative de-blurring of neutron transmission images. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 542(1–3), 361–366 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Milanfar, H. Talebi, A new class of image filters without normalization, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3294–3298. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.S. Patil, R.H. Havaldar, Haze removal and fuzzy based enhancement of image, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), pp. 1–3. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Alsam, I. Farup, H.J. Rivertz, Iterative sharpening for image contrast enhancement, in Colour and Visual Computing Symposium (CVCS), 2015, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Nitta, R. Shogenji, S. Miyatake, J. Tanida, Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative back projection method. Appl. Opt. 45(13), 2893–2900 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.J. Parada, E.B. Gindele, A.L. McCarthy, K.E. Spaulding, in U.S. Patent No. 6,795,585. (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.H. Malik, T.A. Lone, Comparative study of digital image enhancement approaches, in 2014 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O.N. Portniaguine, M.S. Zhdanov, U.S. Method of digital image enhancement and sharpening, in Patent No. 6,879,735 (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Sravankumar
    • 1
  • Chunduru Anilkumar
    • 2
  • Sathishkumar Easwaramoorthy
    • 2
  • Somula Ramasubbareddy
    • 2
    Email author
  • K. Govinda
    • 2
  1. 1.QIS Institute of TechnologyOngoleIndia
  2. 2.Vellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations