An Assessment of Interaction Protocols for Multi-agent Systems

  • Dimple JunejaEmail author
  • Jasmine
  • Shefali
  • Pratibha Kumari
  • Anjali Arya
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 862)


The paper begins by instigating the sketch of agents from different perspectives and expanding to the assessment of various protocols for agent communication and provides an analysis of various available protocols. The paper majorly contributes a concise review of all agent protocols and also presents the issues that can be addressed for further improvement. The article settles by presenting the open challenges in the said domain and future research directions in the said domain.


Software agents Intelligent agents Intelligent computing Multi-agent systems Agent interaction protocols 


  1. 1.
    M. Glavic, Agents and multi-agent systems: a short introduction for power engineers, a technical report, University of Liege Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, pp. 1–21 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Wettig, E. Zehender, A legal analysis of human and electronic agents. Artif. Intell. Law 12(1–2), 111–135 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Jennings, M. Wooldridge, Software agents. IEE Rev. 42(1), 17–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.Ε. Georgakarakou, A.A. Economides, Software agent technology: an οverview application to virtual enterprises, in Agent and Web Service Technologies in Virtual Enterprises, ed. by P.F. Tiako (ed.) IGI-Global, ISBN: 978-1-60566-060-8 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.S. Nwana, D.T. Ndumu, A brief introduction to software agent technology, in Agent Technology (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. DeLoach, M.F. Wood, C.H. Sparkman, Multiagent systems engineering. Int. J. Software Eng. Knowl. Eng. 11(03), 231–258 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Jenabzadeh, B. Safarinejadian, Distributed tracking control problem of Lipschitz multi-agent systems with external disturbances and input delay. Syst. Sci. Control. Eng. 6(1), 268–278 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.J.P. da Cunha, T.F.M. Sirqueira, M.L. Viana, C.J. Pereira, Extending BDI multiagent systems with agent norms. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Eng. 12(5) (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Cohen, J.S. Dibangoye, A.I. Mouaddib, Open decentralized POMDPs, in 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). (IEEE, New York, 2017 November), pp. 977–984Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, F. Capuzzimati, R. Micalizio, Commitment-based agent interaction in JaCaMo+. FundamentaInformaticae 159(1–2), 1–33 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Bhateja, B. Le Nguyen, N.G. Nguyen, S.C. Satapathy, D.N. Le (eds.), Information systems design and intelligent applications, in Proceedings of Fourth International Conference India 2017, vol 672 (Springer, Berlin, 2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.J. Lillis, Internalising interaction protocols as first-class programming elements in multi agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02634 (2017)
  13. 13.
    J.K. Mandal, S.C. Satapathy, M.K. Sanyal, P.P. Sarkar, A. Mukhopadhyay (eds.) Information systems design and intelligent applications, in Proceedings of Second International Conference INDIA 2015, vol 2 (Springer, Berlin, 2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Juneja, A. Singh, R. Singh, S. Mukherjee, A thorough insight into theoretical and practical developments in multiagent systems. Int. J. Ambient. Comput. Intell. (IJACI) 8(1), 23–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    U. Wajid, N. Mehandjiev, Agent interaction protocols and flexible agent interaction in dynamic environments, In 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2006. WETICE’06 (IEEE, New York, 2006 June), pp. 23–28Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.P. Huget, J. Odell, Ø. Haugen, M.M. Nodine, S. Cranefield, R. Levy, L. Padgham, FIPA modeling: interaction diagrams. Work. Draft Vers. pp. 07–02 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Singh, D. Juneja, An improved design of contract net trust establishment protocol. Int. J. Commun. 4(1), 19 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Singh, D. Juneja, A.K. Sharma, Introducing trust establishment protocol in contract net protocol, in 2010 International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering (ACE) (IEEE, New York, 2010 June), pp. 59–63Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Singh, A. Singh, S. Mukherjee, A critical investigation of agent interaction protocols in multiagent systems. Int. J. Adv. Technol. 5(2), 72–81 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Vokřínek, J. Bíba, J. Hodík, J. Vybíhal, M. Pěchouček, Competitive contract net protocol, in International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, 2007 January), pp. 656–668Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Wu, Contract net protocol for coordination in multi-agent system, in Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, 2008. IITA’08, vol 2 (IEEE, New York, 2008 December), pp. 1052–1058Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Juneja, R. Singh, A. Singh, S. Mukherjee, A clustering-based generic interaction protocol for multiagent systems, in Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications (Springer, New Delhi, 2016), pp. 563–572Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimple Juneja
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jasmine
    • 1
  • Shefali
    • 1
  • Pratibha Kumari
    • 1
  • Anjali Arya
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations