Land Use Land Cover Classification Using a Novel Decision Tree Algorithm and Satellite Data Sets

  • K. V. Ramana RaoEmail author
  • P. Rajesh Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 862)


Since many changes are taking place on the surface of the earth for various reasons such as human activities, natural calamities, and environmental changes, the up-to-date regional land information of an area has got lot of importance for local authorities. Though this information can be collected using traditional land surveying methods it suffers from certain issues such as lot of man power involvement, more time consumption, etc. With the advent of technology the satellite data images available from various optical and polarimetric SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) sensors can be used for this land use land cover classification purpose. Since the polarimetric SAR (polSAR) data can provide more useful information than optical data it is more preferable for the land use land cover (LULC) classification. PolSAR data available from various airborne sensors and space-borne sensors which are launched into the space during the recent past can be best utilized for LULC classification of any area irrespective of seasonal effects. Though the available classification algorithms are efficient and produce good classification accuracy results they have their own drawbacks for some reasons. The decision tree algorithm developed for LULC classification in the present study is based on Gumbel distribution of nonlinear regression model [1]. Because of the flexibility in the design and other advantages this decision tree algorithm produced consistent classification accuracy results for all the data sets used in the present study [2].


Polarimetric SAR data Classification Decision tree algorithm Accuracy 


  1. 1.
    D. Singh, P. Mishra, Y. Yamaguchi, Land cover classification of PALSAR images by knowledge based decision tree classifier and supervised classifiers based on SAR observables. Prog. Electromagnet. Res. B 30, 47–70 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Friedl, C.E. Brodley, Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 61, 399–409 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Wang, H. Lin, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, Q. Zeng, Application of multi-temporal ENVISAT ASAR data to agricultural area mapping in the Pearl River Delta. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31(6), 1555–1572 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Abdikan, F.B. Sanli, M. Ustuner, F. Calo, Land cover mappping using SENTINELl-1 SAR data, in The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLI-B7 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Nagler, H. Rott, M. Hetzenecker, J. Wuite, P. Potin, The SENTINEL-1 mission; new opportunities for ice sheet observations. Remote Sens. 7(7), 9371–9389 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.K. Raney, J.T.S. Cahill, G.W. Patterson, D.B.J. Bussey, The m-chi decomposition of hybrid dual-polarimetric radar data with application to lunar craters: M-chi Decomposition of Lunar Craters. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117(E12) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.S. Srivastava, Y. Sharma, P. Patel, Feasibility of use of optical and SAR data for land cover mapping, in Proceedings of ISRS-2008 National Symposium, 18–20 Dec 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Pal, P.M. Mather, An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 86(4), 554–565 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.S. Lee, M.R. Grunes, E. Pottier, Quantitavie comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 39(11), 2343–2351 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEVIEWVisakhapatnamIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECEA.U.C.EVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations