Picture Archiving and Communication Systems

  • Euclid Seeram


This chapter described the major system components and technologies related to picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) used in medical imaging. First a definition of PACS is provided followed by a brief description of the major components of a PACS. Several definitions have been cited in the chapter. One such definition is that PACS is fundamentally a highly sophisticated storage system that stores data and images from the image acquisition equipment and uses computer networks and application software not only to display images for viewing and interpretation but to transmit the data and images to remote locations, and as a result, PACS has become an enterprise image management system. Major components include image acquisition modalities, computer networks, the PACS main computer, image storage characteristics, image compression, display and analysis workstations, the radiology information system (RIS) and the PACS broker, and finally the web server. PACS is also characterized by the use of two communication standards, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM®) and Health Level-7 (HL-7). While HL-7 deals with the flow of textual information between the hospital information system (HIS) and the RIS and other information systems in the hospital, DICOM® deals primarily with the exchange of images in the radiology department and facilitates communication among manufacturer-specific imaging equipment.

DICOM® is an international standard to transmit, store, retrieve, print, process, and display medical imaging information. An essential feature of PACS is that in order to facilitate communications between various computer-based healthcare information systems and imaging modalities and PACS vendors through the integrated use of DICOM® and HL-7 requires an initiative referred to as Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE). IHE provides a process flowchart that illustrates the resources and tools such as standards, technical specifications, integration profiles, and technical frameworks, for example, for the purpose of helping users not only to integrate systems but also to share information in an efficient and effective manner.

Two other significant features gaining widespread attention in the PACS environment is the vendor neutral archive (VNA) and more recently enterprise imaging. A VNA is an archive that “can be easily migrated, ported to interface with another vendor’s viewing, acquisition, and workflow engine to manage medical images and related information”; enterprise imaging is a technology that offers improved efficiencies in data archiving and management and creates a comprehensive program that can combine data from different departments into one system. An enterprise imaging system should consist of elements such as governance, enterprise imaging strategy, enterprise imaging platform (infrastructure), clinical images and multimedia content, electronic health record (EHR) enterprise viewer, image exchange services, and image analytics, in order to be successful. Finally the chapter outlines briefly important characteristics of the PACS administrator and the evolving role of the medical imaging technologist as an informaticist.


  1. 1.
    Bushong S. Radiologic science for technologists. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier-Mosby; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang HK. PACS and imaging informatics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang HK. PACS-based multimedia imaging informatics: basic principles and operations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agarwal TK, Sanjeev. Vendor neutral archive in PACS. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012;22(4):242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arenson RL, Andriole K, et al. Computers in imaging and healthcare: now and in the future. J Digital Imaging. 2000;13(4):145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegel E, Reiner B. Image workflow. In: Dreyer KJ, Mehta A, Thrall JH, editors. PACS: a guide to the digital revolution. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hori SC. In: Dreyer KJ, Mehta A, Thrall JH, editors. PACS: a guide to the digital revolution. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Samei E, Seibert JA, Andriole K, Badano A, Crawford J, Reiner B, Flynn MJ, Chang P. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: pacs equipment overview general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment. Radiographics. 2004;24:313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu F, Hernandez-Cabronero M, Sanchez V, Marcellin MW, Bilgin A. The current role of image compression standards in medical imaging. Information. 2017;8:131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seeram E, Seeram D. Image postprocessing in digital radiology: a primer for technologists. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2008;29(1):23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siegel E, Reiner B. Radiology reading room design: the next generation. Appl Radiol. 2002:11–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DICOM: Digital imaging and communications in medicine. Accessed Jan 2018.
  14. 14.
    Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE). IHE IT Infrastructure (ITI). Technical framework. Volume 1. IHE International; 2017.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IHE: Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. Accessed Jan 2018.
  16. 16.
    Roth CJ, Lannum LM, Dennison DK, Towbin AJ. The current state and path forward for enterprise image viewing: HIMSS-SIIM collaborative white paper. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29:567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    HIPPA for Professionals. US Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed Jan 2018.
  18. 18.
    HIMMS Definition of Interoperability. HIMSS Dictionary of healthcare information technology terms, acronyms and organizations. HIMSS Electronic Health Record Association, 2010; Appendix B, p190, original source.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth CJ, Lannum LM, Persons KR. A foundation for enterprise imaging: HIMSS-SIIM collaborative white paper. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29:530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roth CJ, Lannum LM, Joseph CL. Enterprise imaging governance: HIMSS-SIIM collaborative white paper. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29:539–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Towbin AJ, Roth CJ, Bronkalla M, Cram D. Workflow challenges of enterprise imaging: HIMSS-SIIM collaborative white paper. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29:574–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Webopedia. Cloud computing. Accessed Feb 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Euclid Seeram
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Medical Radiation Sciences University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Adjunct Associate Professor, Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  4. 4.Adjunct Professor, Faculty of ScienceCharles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia
  5. 5.Adjunct Associate Professor, Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of HealthUniversity of CanberraBruceAustralia

Personalised recommendations