Skip to main content

Digital Tomosynthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Radiography
  • 1871 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present a brief description of digital tomosynthesis, a three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique that overcomes the problems of conventional two-dimensional (2D) tomography. The technique involves image acquisition, image reconstruction, and image display and communication. While image acquisition is such that the X-ray tube rotates through a limited angle about the detector which is often stationary, to obtain a number of projection data are taken from different angles. These data are subsequently reconstructed to produce individual slices of the volume of tissue scanned, using algorithms specially developed for tomosynthesis. There are two types of designs for image acquisition in digital tomosynthesis: step-and-shoot system and continuous scan system. While, in the former method, the X-ray tube that moves to every angular position stops, an exposure is taken and the tube then moves to the next angular position; in the latter system, the X-ray tube moves during the scanning of the object. Digital tomosynthesis (DT) is being applied to general radiographic imaging and to digital breast imaging referred to as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).

Major imaging system components include the X-ray tube and housing designed to rotate during the data acquisition, collimation and filtration, breast support, breast compression device, and either a full-field indirect flat-panel digital detector {amorphous silicon (a-Si) cesium iodide (CsI)} or a full-field direct flat-panel digital detector (a-Selenium). Furthermore DT is characterized by several parameters such as the sweep angle, sweep direction, patient barrier-object distance, number of projections, and total radiation dose. Additionally an overview of image reconstruction methods of DT, image display and communication, and radiation dose considerations is presented. Finally, this chapter concludes with an outline of synthesized 2D digital mammography (DM) and clinical applications of DT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vallebona A. Radiography with great enlargement (microradiography) and a technical method for radiographic dissociation of the shadow. Radiology. 1931;17:340–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bocage E. M. Patent No. 536, 464, Paris. History of tomography. Medicamundi, 1974; 19: 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grant DG. Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional radiographic imaging technique. IEEE Trans Biomed EngBME. 1972;19:20–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maidment ADA. The future of medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010;139(1–3):3–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Machida H, Yuhara T, Mori T, Ueno E, Moribe Y, Sabol JM. Whole-body clinical applications of digital Tomosynthesis. Radiographics. 2010;30:549–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tingberg A. X-ray Tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. Radiol Clin N Am. 2010;52:489–97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Digital Tomosynthesis. Technique Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52:489–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith A. Fundamentals of breast tomosynthesis. Improving the performance of mammography. White Paper, Bedford, MA. Hologic, Incâ„¢. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith A. Design considerations in optimizing a breast tomosynthesis system. White Paper, Bedford, MA. Hologic, Incâ„¢. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sechopoulos I. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. the image acquisition process. Med Phys. 2013;40(1):014301-1–014301-12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bushong S. Radiologic science for technologists. 11th ed. St Louis: MO. Elsevier; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomi T. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms regarding exposure dose reductions during digital breast Tomosynthesis. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2014;7:516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital breast Tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art. Radiology. 2015;277:663–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Machida H, Yuhara T, Tamura M, Ishikawa T, Tate E, Ueno E, Nye K, Sabol JM. Whole-body clinical applications of digital Tomosynthesis. Radiographics. 2016;36:735–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ. Digital X-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(19):R65–R106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sechopoulos I. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. Med Phys. 2013;40(1):014302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Teuwen J, Vreemann S, Bouwman RW, van Engen RE, Karssemeijer N, Mann RM, Gubern-Merida A, Sechopoulos I. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers. Acta Radiol. 2017;0(0):1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gennaro G, Bernardi D, Houssami N. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(2):573–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alakhras MM, Mello-Thoms C, Bourne R, Rickard M, Diffey J, Brennan PC. Relationship between radiation dose and image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;173(I4):351–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. James JR, Pavlicek W, Hanson JA, Boltz TF, Patel BK. Breast radiation dose with CESM compared with 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Young KC. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Svahn TM, Houssami N, Sechopoulos I, Mattsson S. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast. 2015;24(2):93–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olgar T, Kahn T, Gosch D. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Rofo. 2012;184(10):911–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson JS, Wells JR, Baker JA, Samei E. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM? Med Phys. 2016;43(5):2538–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Skaane P, Bandos A, Eben E. Two-view digital breast Tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast Tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology. 2014;271(3):655–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zuckerman SP, Maidment ADA, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Imaging with synthesized 2D mammography: differences, advantages, and pitfalls compared with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):222–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith A. Synthesized 2D mammographic imaging. White Paper, Bedford, MA. Hologic, Incâ„¢. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seeram, E. (2019). Digital Tomosynthesis. In: Digital Radiography. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3244-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3244-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3243-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3244-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics