Skip to main content

ERCP-Induced Perforations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 389 Accesses

Part of the book series: GI Surgery Annual ((GISA,volume 25))

Abstract

In the epoch of minimally invasive management of biliary and pancreatic disorders, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) has become a prevalent procedure all over the world. Even though ES is a safe procedure, it carries a small but significant number of serious complications which include pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis and perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rabie ME, Al Faris S, Nasser A, et al. Parenchymal guidewire perforation during ERCP: an unappreciated injury. Case Rep Surg. 2015;2015:670323.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD, et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg. 2007;142:448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin LF, Siauw CP, Ho KS, Tung JC. ERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy patients: emphasis on technique. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stermer E, Levy N. Esophageal perforation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fireman Z, Kyzer S, Michalevicz D, et al. Esophageal perforation after endoscopic sphincterotomy during stone extraction from the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19(2):173–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Faylona JM, Qadir A, Chan AC, et al. Small-bowel perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Endoscopy. 1999;31:546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232:191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayaprakash B, Wright R. Common bile duct perforation--an unusual complication of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;32:246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coelho JC, Campos AC, Pisani JC, et al. Common hepatic duct perforation: a rare complication associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayhan B, Akdoğan M, Sahin B. ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP. 2012;13:18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery. 1999;126:658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polydorou A, Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, et al. A tailored approach to the management of perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin DF, Tweedle DE. Retroperitoneal perforation during ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy: causes, clinical features and management. Endoscopy. 1990;22:174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, Sutherland FR. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8:393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Assalia A, Suissa A, Ilivitzki A, et al. Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS. Complications of endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989;14:127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwon W, Jang JY, Ryu JK, et al. Proposal of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation management guideline based on perforation type. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83:218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement. Endoscopy. 2014;46:693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Herman L. Hemoclip repair of a sphincterotomy-induced duodenal perforation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Solomon M, Schlachterman A, Morgenstern R. Iatrogenic duodenal perforation treated with endoscopic placement of metallic clips: a case report. Case Rep Med. 2012;2012:609750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Donatelli G, Dumont JL, Vergeau BM, et al. Colic and gastric over-the-scope clip (Ovesco) for the treatment of a large duodenal perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2014;7:282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tribonias G, Voudoukis E, Vardas E, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related large jejunal perforation: operate or apply over-the-scope clip device? Clin Endosc. 2014;47:281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Han Z, Zhang W, et al. Successful closure of lateral duodenal perforation by endoscopic band ligation after endoscopic clipping failure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA, et al. Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate. Endoscopy. 1994;26:209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C, et al. Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral centre. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Wu SJ, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a metaanalysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ciaccia D, Branch MS, Baillie J. Pneumomediastinum after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:475.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee TH, Bang BW, Jeong JI, et al. Primary endoscopic approximation suture under cap-assisted endoscopy of an ERCP-induced duodenal perforation. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Q, Ji J, Wang F, et al. ERCP-induced duodenal perforation successfully treated with endoscopic purse-string suture: a case report. Oncotarget. 2015;6:17847.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Buffoli F, Grassia R, Iiritano E, et al. Endoscopic “retroperitoneal fatpexy” of a large ERCP-related jejunal perforation by using a new over-the-scope clip device in Billroth II anatomy. Endoscopy. 2012;75:1115.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Nastos C, et al. Closure of a persistent sphincterotomy-related duodenal perforation by placement of a covered self-expandable metallic biliary stent. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Krishna RP, Singh RK, Behari A, et al. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography perforation managed by surgery or percutaneous drainage. Surg Today. 2011;41:660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Loske G, Rucktäschel F, Schorsch T, et al. Successful endoscopic vacuum therapy with new open-pore film drainage in a case of iatrogenic duodenal perforation during ERCP. Endoscopy. 2015;47:E577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mutignani M, Iacopini F, Dokas S, et al. Successful endoscopic closure of a lateral duodenal perforation at ERCP with fibrin glue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang HY, Chen JH. Endoscopic fibrin sealant closure of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Morgan KA, Fontenot BB, Ruddy JM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography gut perforations: when to wait! when to operate! Am Surg. 2009;75:477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Preetha M, Chung YF, Chan WH, et al. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mao Z, Zhu Q, Wu W, et al. Duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: experience and management. J Laparo endosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18:691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Miller R, Zbar A, Klein Y, et al. Perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a single institution experience and surgical recommendations. Am J Surg. 2013;206:180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Koc B, Bircan HY, Adas G, et al. Complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimal invasive surgical recommendations. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Turner RC, Steffen CM, Boyd P. Endoscopic duodenal perforation: surgical strategies in a regional centre. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Berne CJ, Donovan AJ, White EJ, Yellin AE. Duodenal diverticulization for duodenal and pancreatic injury. Am J Surg. 1974;127:503–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Vaughan GD, Frazier OH, Graham DY, Mattox KL, Petmechy FF, Jordan GL. The use of pyloric exclusion in the management of severe duodenal injuries. Am J Surg. 1977;134:785–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cukingnan RA, Culliford AT, Worth MH. Surgical correction of a lateral duodenal fistula with the Roux-Y technique. J Trauma. 1975;15:519–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Doglietto GB, Pacelli F, Caprino P, et al. Posterior laparostomy through the bed of the 12th rib to drain retroperitoneal infection after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Br J Surg. 2004;91:730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Klipfel AA, Schein M. Retroperitoneal perforation of the duodenum and necrotizing extension to the scrotum. Surgery. 2003;133(3):337–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cotton PB, Williams C. Technique of biliary sphincterotomy. In:Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1996. p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tarnasky PR, Kedia P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications: techniques to reduce risk and management strategies. Gastrointest Interv. 2017;6:37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:1135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22:567–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Norton ID, Petersen BT, Bosco J, Nelson DB, Meier PB, Baron TH, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy using pure-cut versus combined cut and coagulation waveforms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Indian Association of Surgical Gastroenterology

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soundappan, S., Pradeep, R., Rao, G.V., Reddy, D.N. (2019). ERCP-Induced Perforations. In: Sahni, P., Pal, S. (eds) GI Surgery Annual. GI Surgery Annual, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3227-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3227-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3226-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3227-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics