Skip to main content

Existing Approaches to Economic Regionalism and Their Limitations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 234 Accesses

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific ((CSAP))

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, the development of economic regionalism in many parts of the globe has been a matter of scholarly debate concerning the forms, instruments, and mechanisms of regional governance. The existing literature has developed around three different emphases, namely the functional objectives of regional economic integration, the nation-state’s strategy in order to survive, and the political and economic sources of regional institution building. These emphases emerged from the international relations theory and have been associated with three different groups of literature: the liberal framework of regionalism (functionalism and neoliberal institutionalism); the realist approach; and the political economy approach respectively. This chapter provides an analysis that finds that these existing approaches have limitations in explaining the social forces that drive the regional economic institution. The chapter shows that it is essential to place the broader structural context of the transformation of capitalist class in defining the economic project at regional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    APEC is also an example of ‘open regionalism’ that encourages further economic integration and minimizes the impact of national borders and controls. This implies a desire for non-discriminatory trade practices and a willingness to accept new members, differing sharply from the more closed variety of regionalism that marks Europe and the Americas (see Haggard, 1997; Katzenstein, 1997).

Bibliography

  • Acharya, Amitav. 2013. The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, Bela. 1961. The Theory of Economic Integration. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” Working Paper No. 4465, September. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard. 2006. “Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade.” World Economy No. 29 (11):1451–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard, and Patrick Low, eds. 2008. Multilateralizing Regionalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark. 2005. “Rethinking Regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy No. 12 (6):969–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark. 2007. Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia: Politics, Security and Economic Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark. 2008. Institution of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark. 2009. “Geopolitics and the Making of Regions: The Fall and Rise of East Asia.” Political Studies No. 57:498–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark, and Richard Stubbs, eds. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Mark M. 2002. “Institutions and Ideas.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 292–311. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Paul, and Brian MacLean. 1996. “Understanding Trade Bloc Formation: The Case of the ASEAN Free Trade Area.” Review of International Political Economy No. 3 (2):319–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, Shaun, and Richard Higgott. 2000. “Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New.” New Political Economy No. 5 (3):333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Kevin G. 2010. The Politics of Economic Regionalism: Explaining Regional Economic Integration in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, Siow Yue. 2010. “Trade and Investment Policies and Regional Economic Integration in East Asia.” No. 210. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Byung-Il, and Kong-Jin Lee. 2005. “A Long and Winding Road: Ratification of Korea’s First FTA.” In Korea and International Conflicts: Case Studies–Volume 1, edited by Byung-Il Choi, 11–47. Seoul: Institute for International Trade and Cooperation, Ewha Womans University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Ji Young. 2012. “A Comparative Analysis of Economic Regionalism in Europe and East Asia: A Historical Institutionalist Approach.” Journal of International and Area Studies No. 19 (1):59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Mary, Björn Hettne, and Luk Van Langenhove, eds. 2005. Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise. 1995. “Regionalism in Historical Perspective.” In Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, edited by Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, 9–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise. 2004. “Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism.” International Affairs No. 80 (3):429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise. 2005. “Regionalism from an Historical Perspective.” In Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice, edited by Mary Farrell, Björn Hettne and Luk Van Langenhove, 21–37. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, Jim. 1999. “State Power beyond the ‘Territorial Trap’: The Internationalization of the State.” Political Geography No. 18 (6):669–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Martin, and Terry O’Callaghan. 2002. International Relations: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grugel, Jean, and Wil Hout, eds. 1999. Regionalism Across the North-South Divide: State Strategies and Globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces. London: Stevens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1961. “International Integration: The European and the Universal Process.” International Organization No. 15:366–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan. 1997. “Regionalism in Asia and the Americas.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner, 20–49. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, Shahar. 2009. “Beyond Methodological Nationalism, but Where to for the Study of Regional Governance?” Australian Journal of International Affairs No. 63 (3):430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn. 2003. “The New Regionalism Revisited.” In Theories of New Regionalism: A Palgrave Reader, edited by Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw, 22–43. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn. 2005. “Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism.” New Political Economy No. 10 (4):543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn, and Fredrik Söderbaum. 2000. “Theorising the Rise of Regionness.” New Political Economy No. 5 (3):457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, Denis, and Rahul Sen. 2004. “Towards an ASEAN Economic Community: Challenges and Prospects.” Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, Denis, and Hadi Soesastro. 2003. “Realizing the ASEAN Economic Community by 2020: ISEAS and ASEAN-ISIS Approaches.” ASEAN Economic Bulletin No. 20 (3):292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, Andrew. 2011. Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew. 1995a. “Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics.” Review of International Studies No. 21 (4):331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew. 1995b. “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective.” In Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, edited by Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, 37–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hveem, Helge. 2000. “Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalisation.” In Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, edited by Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey G. R. Underhill, 70–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intal, Ponciano S. Jr. 1997. “ASEAN and the Challenge of Closer Economic Integration.” No. 97-14. Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2003. “Governing the Asia Pacific: Beyond the ‘New Regionalism’: Introduction.” Third World Quarterly No. 24 (2):199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, Kanishka, ed. 2004. Asian Regional Governance: Crisis and Change. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2008. “Regionalising the State: Political Topography of Regulatory Regionalism.” Contemporary Politics No. 14 (1):21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Lee. 2015. “Explaining the Failure of the ASEAN Economic Community: The Primacy of Domestic Political Economy.” The Pacific Review No. 29 (5):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. 1997. “Introduction: Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective.” In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein and Takashi Shiraishi, 1–44. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International Organization No. 36 (2):325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1993. “Institutionalist Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism, edited by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Leon N. 1963. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward D., and Helen V. Milner. 1997. “The Political Economy of Regionalism: An Overview.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner, 1–19. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward D., and Helen V. Milner. 1999. “The New Wave of Regionalism.” International Organization No. 53 (3):589–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Organization No. 15 (1):5–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses.” World Politics No. 44 (3):466–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Helen, and Edward D. Mansfield. 1997. “The Political Economy of Regionalism.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, edited by Helen Milner and Edward D. Mansfield, 1–20. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, David. 1966. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, James H. 2000. The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2003. Globalisation, Domestic Politics and Regionalism: The ASEAN Free Trade Area. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2008. “The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).” New Political Economy No. 13 (2):225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sung-Hoon, and Min Gyo Koo. 2007. “Forming a Cross-Regional Partnership: The South Korea-Chile FTA and Its Implications.” Pacific Affairs No. 80 (2):259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Anthony, and Andrew Gamble. 1996. “Introduction: The Political Economy of Regionalism and World Order.” In Regionalism and World Order, edited by Anthony Payne and Andrew Gamble. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Richard. 2007. “ASEAN Regionalism: Growth Through Integration.” Asia Pacific: Perspectives No. 7 (1):11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pempel, T. J. 2005. “Introduction: Emerging Webs of Regional Connectedness.” In Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region, edited by T. J. Pempel, 1–30. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, C. C. 1990. “Integration, Interdependence, and Institutions: Approaches to International Order.” In World Politics: Power, Interdependence & Dependence, edited by David G. Haglund and Michael K. Hawes, 181–182. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978a. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978b. State, Power and Socialism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, John. 2010. “The ‘New East Asian Regionalism’: A Political Domino Effect.” Review of International Political Economy No. 17 (2):178–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Volker, ed. 1993. Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozman, Gilbert. 2012. “East Asian Regionalism.” In Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, edited by Mark Beeson and Richard Stubbs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searight, Amy. 2009. “Emerging Economic Architecture in Asia: Opening or Insulating the Region?” In Asia’s New Multilateralism, edited by Michael J. Green and Bates Gill, 193–242. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severino, Rodolfo C. 2011. “Politics of Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economic Cooperation.” Asian Economic Policy Review No. 6:22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Fredrik. 2012. “Theories of Regionalism.” In Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, edited by Mark Beeson and Richard Stubbs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soesastro, Hadi. 2005. “Accelerating ASEAN Economic Integration: Moving Beyond AFTA.” No. WPE 091. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirk, Peter M. R. 1996. A History of European Integration Since 1914. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Richard. 2000. “Signing on to Liberalization: AFTA and the Politics of Regional Economic Cooperation.” The Pacific Review No. 13 (2):297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen, Raimo. 2003. “Regionalism: Old and New.” International Studies Review No. 5 (1):25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Wolfgang. 1997. “An Ever Closer Fusion: A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes.” Journal of Common Market Studies No. 35 (2):267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Jeffrey D. 2012. “Resource Security: A New Motivation for Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region.” The Pacific Review No. 25 (4):429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Jeffrey D. 2015. “Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?” Journal of Contemporary Asia No. 45 (2):345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Peter. 2000. “The Export Competitiveness of Dynamic Asian Economies: 1983–1995.” Journal of Economic Studies No. 27 (6):541–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Jens-Uwe 2007. Regionalism, Globalisation and International Order: Europe and Southeast Asia. Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Walter, Andrew. 1995. “Regionalism, Globalization, and World Economic Order.” In Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, edited by Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, 74–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Al-Fadhat, F. (2019). Existing Approaches to Economic Regionalism and Their Limitations. In: The Rise of International Capital. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3191-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics