Abstract
One of the primary causes of disease among women is breast cancer. According to a survey, one out of every twenty-eight women in India is susceptible to breast cancer. Early detection and avoidance methods can reduce the prospects of death considerably. Three methods are available for breast cancer detection—mammography, FNA, surgical biopsy. The sensitivity of mammography varies from 65 to 79% that of FNA varies from 65 to 85%. Surgical biopsy is close to 100% but is tedious and expensive. Diagnosis of breast cancer is a noteworthy area of data mining study. In our work, a comparison among the various classifiers like logistic regression, KNN classifier, naïve Bayes, state vector machines, decision trees, random forest classifier on Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer (WDBC) dataset based on accuracy and confusion matrix is offered. In addition, it presents a combination of different classifiers by means of stacked generalization method. Different dimensionality reduction methods like least discriminant analysis and principal component analysis have been used on the dataset. All models are programmed in Python 3 using Anaconda environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2008 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control.
World Health Organization. Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/index1.html.
G.I. Salama, M.B. Abdelhalim and Abd-elghany Zeid. Experimental Comparison for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Egypt: IEEE 2012.
UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Breast+Cancer+Wisconsin+%28Diagnostic%29.
Angeline Christobel Y, Dr. Sivaprakasam. “An Empirical Comparison of Data Mining Classification Methods”. International Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol 3, No. 2. 2011.
Vapnik. V.N., “The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory”. 1st ed., Springer-Verlag. New York, 1995.
L. Yaun. “An Improved Naïve Bayes Text Classification Algorithm In Chinese Information Processing”. Science, pp. 267–269. 2010.
H. Jiawei and K. Micheline. “Data Mining- Concepts and Techniques”, Second Edition, Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier Publishers, ISBN: 978-1-55860-901-3, 2008.
Zahra Nematzadeh, Roliana Ibrahim and Ali Selamat. Comparative Studies on Breast Cancer Classifications with K-Fold Cross Validations Using Machine Learning Techniques. Malaysia, UTM: IEEE 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumar, A., Poonkodi, M. (2019). Comparative Study of Different Machine Learning Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In: Chattopadhyay, J., Singh, R., Bhattacherjee, V. (eds) Innovations in Soft Computing and Information Technology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3185-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3185-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3184-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3185-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)