Skip to main content

Design Basis Ground Motion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Seismic Design

Abstract

Earthquake can cause large destruction in industrial structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

\( N_{m} \) :

Cumulative number of earthquakes of given magnitude or larger that are expected to occur during a specified period of time

a :

The log number of earthquakes zero or greater expected to occur during same time

b :

The slope of Gutenberg –Richter curve which characterizes a large portion of earthquakes

R :

Hypocentral distance

M :

Magnitude

\( \upsilon_{k} (m_{0} ) \) :

The annual frequency of occurrence of earthquakes on seismic source k whose magnitudes are greater than m0 and below the maximum event size, mu

fR(r):

Probability density function of source-to-site distance ‘R’

f M \( (m_{i} ) \) :

Probability density function of magnitude ‘M’

P(A > a|mi,rj):

The probability that ground motion level ‘a’ will be exceeded, for a given earthquake of magnitude mi at distance of rj from the site

H :

Depth of focus

t :

Plant lifetime

Mo:

Seismic moment

f o :

Corner frequency

β :

Shear wave velocity

\( \Delta \sigma \) :

Stress drop

\( R_{\theta \psi } \) :

Radiation pattern

\( \rho \) :

Density

K :

Kappa

Q :

Quality factor

\( \frac{{S_{\alpha } }}{g} \) :

The ratio of spectral acceleration at bedrock level to acceleration due to gravity

References

  1. AERB Safety Guide SG/S-11 (1990) Seismic studies and design basis ground motion for nuclear power plant site. AERB, Mumbai, India

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kramer SL (2003) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. University of Washington, Prentice-Hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verma AK, Srividya A, Hari Prasad M (2015) Risk management of non-renewable energy systems, 1st edn. Springer series in Reliability Engineering, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2011) Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(3):1121–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raghukanth STG and Iyengar RN (2010) Technical report of the working committee of experts (WCE) of NDMA on Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(36):1012–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva W, Gregor N, Darragh R (2002) Development of regional hard rock attenuation relations for Central And Eastern North America. Unpublished report, Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, California

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pezeshk S, Zandieh A, Tavakoli B (2011) Hybrid empirical ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America using NGA models and updated seismological parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1859–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  1. Bommer JJ, Scott SG, Sarma SK (2000) Hazard-consistent earthquake scenarios. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 19:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. EPRI NP-4726 (1991) Seismic hazard methodology for the Central and Eastern United States. EPRI

    Google Scholar 

  3. IAEA-SSG-9 (2010) Seismic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  4. IAEA-TECDOC-724 (1993) Probabilistic safety assessment for seismic events. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy RP, Cornell CA, Campbell RD, Kaplan S, Perla HF (1980) Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des 59:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kijko A, Dessokey MM (1987) Application of the extreme magnitude distributions to incomplete earthquake files. Bull Seism Soc Am 77(4):1429–1436

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1989) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files Part I. Utilisation of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes. Bull Seism Soc Am 79(3):645–654

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1992) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files Part II. Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity. Bull Seism Soc America 82(1):120–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reiter L (1991) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seism Soc Am 85(5):1275–1284

    Google Scholar 

  11. NUREG/CR-6372 (1997) Recommendations for PSHA. USNRC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bazzurro P, Allin Cornell C (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seism Soc Am 89(2):501–520

    Google Scholar 

  13. RG-1.165 (1997) Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion. USNRC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Reddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Development of New Attenuation Relationships

Appendix 1: Development of New Attenuation Relationships

2.1.1 A.1 Introduction

As explained in Sect. 2.7, there are two approaches available for developing attenuation relationships . First one is regression from strong motion database, and the second one is from simulation. The steps involved in development of new attenuation relationships are given below:

  • Step 1: Obtain acceleration time histories from either earthquake records or from simulation for various magnitudes and distances.

  • Step 2: Evaluate response spectra corresponding to required damping from the available acceleration time histories.

  • Step 3: For each frequency of the response spectrum , segregate the spectral acceleration data for all magnitudes and distances.

  • Step 4: Select a suitable form for attenuation relationship.

  • Step 5: Evaluate the coefficients of attenuation relationship for each frequency using the regression procedure explained in subsequent section.

  • Step 6: Evaluate the standard deviation for each frequency

2.1.2 A.2 Details of Evaluation of Coefficients of Attenuation Relationship Using Regression

After segregating the spectral acceleration for all magnitudes and distances corresponding to each frequency and selection of the form, the coefficients of attenuation relationship are evaluated using regression as described below:

  • Step 1: The first step in regression is to obtain a system of linear equations from the data and attenuation relationship form.

  • Step 2: Solution of set of linear equations to obtain the coefficients of attenuation relationship.

  • Step 3: Evaluate the standard deviation of the data.

This procedure is illustrated in the example given below:

Example A.1

From the data of PGA (g) for different magnitudes and distances given in Table 2.14, evaluate the coefficients of attenuation relationship given below. Also, estimate the standard deviation.

$$ \log \left( {\text{PGA}} \right) = C_{1} + C_{2} M + C_{3} M^{2} + C_{4} { \log }R $$
Table 2.14 Sample data of PGA for various magnitudes and distances
  • Step 1:

  • The first step in regression is to obtain a system of linear equations.

  • $$ AX = B $$
  • In which A, B, and X are given as follows:

  • $$ \begin{aligned} A \, & = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 1 & {M_{1} } & {M_{1}^{2} } & {\log R_{1} } \\ 1 & {M_{2} } & {M_{2}^{2} } & {\log R_{2} } \\ 1 & {M_{3} } & {M_{3}^{2} } & {\log R_{3} } \\ 1 & {M_{4} } & {M_{4}^{2} } & {\log R_{4} } \\ 1 & {M_{5} } & {M_{5}^{2} } & {\log R_{5} } \\ 1 & {M_{6} } & {M_{6}^{2} } & {\log R_{6} } \\ 1 & {M_{7} } & {M_{7}^{2} } & {\log R_{7} } \\ 1 & {M_{8} } & {M_{8}^{2} } & {\log R_{8} } \\ 1 & {M_{9} } & {M_{9}^{2} } & {\log R_{9} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \\ & = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {1.0000} & {4.5000} & {20.2500} & {1.3010} \\ {1.0000} & {4.5000 } & {20.2500} & {1.9031} \\ {1.0000} & {4.5000 } & {20.2500} & {2.1761} \\ {1.0000} & {5.0000} & {25.0000} & {1.4771} \\ {1.0000} & {5.0000} & {25.0000} & {1.7404} \\ {1.0000} & {5.5000} & {30.2500} & {1.8451} \\ {1.0000} & {6.0000} & {36.0000} & {1.4771} \\ {1.0000} & {6.0000} & {36.0000} & {2.3010} \\ {1.0000} & {6.5000} & {42.2500} & {1.6021} \\ \end{array} } \right] \\ \end{aligned} $$
    $$ \begin{aligned} B & = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {{ \log }\left( {\text{PGA}} \right)_{1} } \\ {{ \log }\left( {\text{PGA}} \right)_{2} } \\ {{ \log }\left( {\text{PGA}} \right)_{3} } \\ {{ \log }\left( {\text{PGA}} \right)_{4} } \\ {{ \log }\left( {\text{PGA}} \right)_{5} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \\ & = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { - 2.8774} \\ { - 2.7122} \\ { - 2.6540} \\ { - 2.8223} \\ { - 2.7510} \\ { - 2.7256} \\ { - 2.8223} \\ { - 2.6297} \\ { - 2.7870} \\ \end{array} } \right] \\ X & = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {C_{1} } \\ {C_{2} } \\ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {C_{3} } \\ {C_{4} } \\ \end{array} } \\ \end{array} } \right] \\ \end{aligned} $$
  • Step 2: Obtain the least square solution for the set of linear equations, by solving

  • \( X = A^{ - 1} B \) and X can be obtained as:

  • $$ X = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} { - 3.2728} \\ { 0.0325} \\ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { - 0.0029} \\ {0.2444} \\ \end{array} } \\ \end{array} } \right] $$
  • Step 3: Evaluate the standard deviation of \( \log \left( {\text{PGA}} \right) \), which is obtained as 0.0816.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muruva, H.P., Kiran, A.R., Bandyopadhyay, S., Reddy, G.R., Agrawal, M.K., Verma, A.K. (2019). Design Basis Ground Motion. In: Reddy, G., Muruva, H., Verma, A. (eds) Textbook of Seismic Design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3176-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3176-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3175-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3176-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics