Skip to main content

Computational Study on the Hydrodynamic Effects of Interceptors Fitted to Transom of Planing Vessel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 22))

Abstract

The use of stern flaps, either fixed or controllable and interceptors in high-speed boats, has become an acceptable option to control the running trim of the vessel to enhance its speed and powering performance. The interceptor changes the pressure distribution underneath the hull over a certain distance forward of the transom. The stern interceptor effect on planing craft performance depends on its parameters and also on those of the craft. The aim to improve the performance on already built high-speed crafts has become an important issue for ecological and economic aspects. So, an in-depth study of the hydrodynamic behaviour of interceptor is essential, before it is adapted to a vessel, to get the best performance during the craft operation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is being used for modelling ship flows due to the advances in computational methods. The aim of this paper is to predict the pressures and resistance characteristics of a high-speed planing craft equipped with an interceptor. The data regarding trim and resistance is generated for a planing hull with interceptor using CFD. In view of the above, an interceptor with 1 mm height is used to study the performance of a planing hull and compared with the experimental studies of Savitsky, Steen, and Srikanth. The numerical model predicts favourable trim and reduced drag for the planing hull with an interceptor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

LCG:

Longitudinal centre of gravity

C f :

Schoenherr turbulent friction coefficient

∇:

Volume of displacement

ρ :

Mass density of water

Δ:

Displacement

β :

Deadrise angle

V 1 :

Average bottom velocity

V :

Forward speed

h i :

Height of interceptor

CDint_S:

Coefficient of drag by Steen

C :

Lift coefficient for a deadrise surface

A D :

Additional drag force due to interceptor

b :

Maximum beam at chine

D f :

Viscous component of drag

c :

Distance between N and CG

N :

Resultant of pressure forces acting normal to bottom

τ :

Trim angle of keel, deg

λ :

Wetted length to beam ratio

ε :

Turbulent energy dissipation rate

i :

Interceptor height

L w :

Mean wetted length

Dint_S:

Added drag due to interceptor

References

  1. Brizzolara S (2003) Hydrodynamic analysis of interceptors with CFD methods. In: 7th international conference on fast sea transportation

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deng R et al (2011) Preliminary numerical investigation of effect of interceptor on Ship resistance

    Google Scholar 

  3. John S, Kareem Khan MD, Praveen PC, Manu K, Panigrahi PK (2011) Hydrodynamic performance enhancement using stern wedges, stern flaps and interceptors. In: ICSOT

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karimi MH, Abbaspoor M (2015) A study on vertical motions of planing boats with automatically controlled stern interceptors in calm water and waves. Ships and offshore struct 10(3):335–348

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luca FD, Pensa C (2011) Experimental data on interceptor effectiveness. In: IX HSMV, Naples

    Google Scholar 

  6. Salas M, Tampier G (2013) Assessment of appendage effect on forward resistance reduction. Ship Sci Technol 7(13):37–45, July 2013, Cartagena (Colombia)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Savitsky D (1964) The hydrodynamic design of planing hulls. Mar Technol 1(1):71–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Srikanth S, Datla R (2008) Performance prediction of high-speed planing craft with interceptors using a variation of the Savitsky method. In: The first Chesapeake power boat symposium

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steen (2007) Experimental investigation of interceptor performance. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai JF, Hwang JL, Chou SK (2004) Study on the compound effects of the interceptor with stern flap for two fast monohulls with transom stern. In: Oceans’04, MTTS/IEEE Tecno-ocean’04, vol 2, pp 1023–1028

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suneela Jangam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jangam, S., Anantha Subramanian, V., Krishnankutty, P. (2019). Computational Study on the Hydrodynamic Effects of Interceptors Fitted to Transom of Planing Vessel. In: Murali, K., Sriram, V., Samad, A., Saha, N. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 22. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3119-0_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3119-0_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3118-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3119-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics