Abstract
There have been several advances made in surgical techniques for conservation laryngectomy primarily for early lesions of the larynx providing excellent cure and functional results. Similarly, considerable advances have been made in chemoradiation for organ preservation in select advanced tumours. However, total laryngectomy still remains the gold standard for most advanced carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx and following salvage surgery in radiation failed cases. It is well realized that this surgical procedure results in permanent tracheo-stoma and loss of normal voice. Besides, there is loss of nasal function and changes in lung function, apart from increased cough and mucous formation. The swallowing ability is affected as well. These factors directly impact the QOL of these patients [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rhys-Evans P, Bloom E. Functional restoration of speech. In: Rhys-Evans PH, Montogomery PG, Gullane PL, editors. Principles and practice of head and neck surgery and oncology. 1st ed. London: Martin Dunitz; 2003. p. 571–602.
Stafferi M, Procaccini A, Steiner W, et al. Surgical rehabilitation of speech after total laryngectomy. Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1978;57:477–88.
Conley JJ, de Amesti F, Pierce MK. A new surgical technique for vocal rehabilitation of the laryngectomised patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972;67:655–64.
Taub S, Spiro DH. Vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomecs. Am J Surg. 1972;124:87–90.
Birchall MA. Laryngeal transplantation. Br J Surg. 1997;84:739–40.
Gates GA, Hearne WN. Predicting Oesophageal speech. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1982;91:454–7.
Amatya RC, Bahadur S, Kacker SK. Oesophageal speech following laryngectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol. 1985;37:34–5.
Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:529–33.
Singer MI, Blom ED, Hamekar RC. Further experience with voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981;90:498–502.
Panje WR. Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:529–31.
Kazi R, Rhys-Evans P, Clarke P. Voice restoration. In: Watkinson JC, Gilebrt R W, editors. Stell and Maran’s text book of head and neck surgery and oncology. London: Hodder Arnold; 2012. p. 1079.
Nayak U, Kazi R. Voice restoration after total laryngectomy. In:Current science and future prospective. Delhi: Byword; 2009.
Hilgers FJM, Schouwenburg PF. A new low resistance, self retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:1202–5.
Hilgers FJM, Corndissen MW, Palm AJM. Aerodynamic characteristics of low resistance indwelling Provox voice prosthesis. Eur Arch Otolaryngol. 1993;250:378–80.
Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH, Balm AJM, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of second generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2) designed for antigrade and retrograde insertion. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117:889–95.
Brown DH, Hilgers AJM, Irish JC, Balm AJM. Post laryngectomy voice rehabilitation state of Art at the Millenium. World J Surg. 2003;27:824–31.
Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC. An improved insufflations test. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111:211–2.
Bozee A, Poissonet G, Chamorey E, et al. Results of vocal rehabilitation using TE. Voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and their predictive factors. Eur Arch Otolaryngol. 2010;267:751–8.
Robertson SM, Yeo J, Dunnet C, et al. Voice, swallowing and quality of life after total laryngectomy. Results of West of Scotland laryngectomy audit. Head Neck. 2012;34:59–65.
Monkarbel RV, Dayal PC, Yoo JH, et al. Voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL) outcomes in laryngectomees. Head Neck. 2011;33:31–6.
Ameye D, Honraet K, Loose D, et al. Effect of a buccal bioadhesive nystatin tablet on the lifetime of a Provox silicon tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125:304–6.
Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJM, Meeuwis CA, et al. Multi-institutional assessment of the Provox voice prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:167–73.
Aust MR, McCaffrey TV. Early speech results with the Provox prosthesis after laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:966–70.
Laccourney O, Menard M, Crevier-Buchman L, et al. In situ life time causes for replacement and complication of the Provox voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:527–30.
Thakar A, Bahadur S. Trouble shooting with Tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;54:27–9.
Molvor J, Evans PF, Perry A, Cheesman AD. Radiological assessment of post laryngectomy speech. Clin Radiol. 1990;41:312–6.
Perry A. Preoperative tracheo-oesophageal voice restoration assessment and selection criteria. In: Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamekar RC, editors. Tracheo-oesophageal voice restoration following total laryngectomy. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1998. p. 9–18.
Lewin JS, Bishop-Leone JK, Forman AD, et al. Further experience with Botox injection for tracheo-oesophageal speech failure. Head Neck. 2001;23:456–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bahadur, S. (2019). Vocal Rehabilitation Following Laryngectomy. In: Bahadur, S., Thakar, A., Mohanti, B. (eds) Carcinoma of the Larynx and Hypopharynx . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3110-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3110-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3109-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3110-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)