Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Equity in Excellence pp 127–147Cite as

Diversity and Equity in Singapore Education: Parental Involvement in Low-Income Families with Migrant Mothers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

Abstract

With its prominence as one of the top-performing systems on international tests such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Singapore’s education system is often regarded as a reputed one in the international arena. This is often seen as a result of much investment in education both at the individual family and the societal level. Having transformed from an underdeveloped country to a largely middle-class developed society within a few decades, education is seen as holding the meritocratic key to a better life. With increased literacy, wealth and fewer children in families over the 50 years of Singapore’s independence, parents focus on more spending and efforts on supporting their children. However, in recent years, there has been a rising concern that the meritocratic promise the Singapore’s education system holds is diminishing (Koh, Doing class analysis in Singapore’s elite education: unravelling the smokescreen of ‘meritocratic talk’. Glob Soc Educ 12(2):196–210, 2014). Growing income disparity in Singapore has led to concerns about an emerging “parentocracy” (Ong, Beware growing ‘parentocracy’: NIE don. The Straits Times. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/beware-growing-parentocracy-nie-don, 2014). Children from better-off families are seen as having competitive advantages through their parents’ ability to provide better resources such as quality private supplementary education and/or even old school connections to enable their enrolment in prestigious schools. With greater globalization and demographic trends in recent years, understanding the needs of Singapore’s diversified low-income families becomes even more crucial in order to better support students from these families so as to mitigate the ills of “parentocracy”. This chapter aims to contribute to the knowledge on the profile and parents’ educational support of low-income families through a study on migrant mothers’ involvement in their Singapore citizen children’s education. It attempts to throw some light on who these families are, the kind of parents’ educational support offered to these students and the challenges faced in rendering that support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These include more financial assistance for students from low-income families such as the MOE Financial Assistance Scheme, Edusave Merit Bursaries and Opportunity Fund, and the Learning Support Programme (LSP) for English and the Learning Support for Mathematics (LSM) to assist low-progress students. More subsidies have also been introduced for preschool education to support students from low-income families.

  2. 2.

    Students in Singapore are streamed into the Express, Normal Academic (NA) or Normal Technical (NT) streams at secondary school level based on their Primary School Leaving Examinations (PSLE) results. Express students complete their secondary school education within 4 years, while NA and NT students finished their course in 5 years. Curriculum is also differentiated across the streams. In recent years, measures have been introduced to enable more flexibility in terms of curriculum porosity as well as transfer across streams if students have performed well and met the criteria (Wang, Teng, & Tan, 2014).

References

  • Baquedano-Lopez, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1990). The ‘third wave’: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, S., & Chew, M. (2012, November 17). PSLE the cause of lacking student diversity. The Straits Times. Retrieved from http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/Latest%2BNews/Edvantage/Story/A1Story20121117-384073.html

  • Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. London: Department of Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWiele, C. E. B., & Edgerton, J. D. (2016). Parentocracy revisited: Still a relevant concept for understanding middle class educational advantage? Interchange, 47(2), 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents’ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. Elementary School Journal, 86, 227–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (1990). School and family connections: Theory, research, and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family. Marriage and Family Review, 15(1–2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, A. (2000). School characteristics and parent involvement: Influences on participation in children’s schools. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafin, J., & Lynch, A. (2002). Peripheral voices: Parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50(3), 227–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, L., & Noguera, P. (2013). The education of Latino students in New York. In A. Falcon (Ed.), Latinos in New York in the 21st century. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, S. J., & Earle, A. (2000). Low-income parents: How do working conditions affect their opportunity to help school-age children at risk? American Educational Research Journal, 37, 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. P. (2010). Multicultural education in Korea: Its development, remaining issues, and global implications. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Whitaker, M. C., & Ice, C. L. (2010). Motivation and commitment to family-school partnerships. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, E. M., Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsin, C.-T. (2011). Active agents: The new-immigrant mothers’ figured worlds of home literacy practices for young children in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K., & Remillard, J. (2005). Rethinking parent involvement: African American mothers construct their roles in the mathematics education of their children. School Community Journal, 15(1), 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khong, L. (2004). Family matters: The role of parents in Singapore education. Singapore, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, A. (2014). Doing class analysis in Singapore’s elite education: Unravelling the smokescreen of ‘meritocratic talk’. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1989). Family-school relationships: A view from the classroom. Educational Policy, 3, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. (2004). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M. A. (2003). School-family relations in context: Parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education, 38(1), 77–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2011). Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the debate on the President’s address, 20 October 2011 at Parliament. Singapore, Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., & Hu, G. (2011). A comparative study of family social capital and literacy practices in Singapore. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 0(0), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, D. (2004). “Some parents don’t care”: Decoding the meanings of parent involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzon, M., Miller, R., Hong, H., & Khong, L. (2015). Parent engagement in education (NIE Working Paper Series No.7). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapp, K. L. (2003). Having their say: Parents describe why and how they are engaged in their children’s learning. School Community Journal, 13(1), 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapp, K. L., & Hong, S. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach parent. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, L. L., & Lai, P. L. (2004). A preliminary study of problems due the low birth rate and the increasing number of children of non-national parents in Taiwan. Quarterly Journal of Community Development, 105, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory in Practice, 31, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Population Secretariat. (2009). An occasional paper on marriages between Singapore citizens and non-Singapore citizens 1998–2008. Singapore, Singapore: NPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2014, March 30). Beware growing ‘parentocracy’: NIE don. The Straits Times. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/beware-growing-parentocracy-nie-don

  • Sanders, M. G., Epstein, J. L., & Connors-Tadros, L. C. (1999). Family partnerships with high schools: The parents’ perspective. Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR), Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. The School Community Journal, 16(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swap, S. M. (1993). Developing home-school partnerships: From concepts to practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. Y. (2013). Theoretical discussion on forms of cultural capital. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, Y. Y. (2018). This is what inequality looks like. Singapore, Singapore: Ethos Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L.-Y., Teng, S. S., & Tan, C. S. (2014). Levelling up academically low progress students (NIE Working Paper Series No. 3). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. G., & Liss, M. B. (1988). Night shift work: Job and family concerns. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3(4), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. B., Mayer, E., & Kreider, H. (2003). Making it work: Low-income working mother’s involvement in their children’s education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 879–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. B., Bouffard, S. M., Bridglall, B. L., & Gordon, E. W. (2009). Reframing family involvement in education: Supporting families to support educational equity. New York: Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A., Noden, P., Edge, A., & David, M. (1998). Parental involvement in education in and out of school. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, S. (2018, February 5). Parliament: Number of student care centres in schools has tripled since 2012. The Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/parliament-number-of-student-care-centres-in-schools-has-tripled-since-2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Siao See Teng

Authors
  1. Siao See Teng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siao See Teng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Siao See Teng  & Kenneth K. Poon  & 

  2. Department of International Education and Lifelong Learning, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Maria Manzon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teng, S.S. (2019). Diversity and Equity in Singapore Education: Parental Involvement in Low-Income Families with Migrant Mothers. In: Teng, S.S., Manzon, M., Poon, K.K. (eds) Equity in Excellence. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2975-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2975-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2973-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2975-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation