Advertisement

Contributions, Arguments, and Dealing with Criticisms

  • Dipankar DebEmail author
  • Rajeeb Dey
  • Valentina E. Balas
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 153)

Abstract

Effectiveness in research output is based on several aspects like developing skills to be able to convey good reasons to believe and accept the conclusions made, deal with the criticisms that may come one’s way from the supervisor, the reviewers or the examiners, and the ability to use the peer review process to one’s advantage to do research that has an impact and contributes to one’s field of study.

References

  1. 1.
    Calcagno, V., Demoinet, E., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D., & de Mazancourt, C. (2012). Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science, 338(6110), 1065–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dizik, A. (2012, June 8). Six ways to deal with criticism at work. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shellenbarger, S. (2014, June 18). How to take criticism well. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knippen, J. T., & Thad, B. (1996). Green, “Handling criticism from your boss”. Employee Counseling Today, 8(7), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringInstitute of Infrastructure Technology Research and Management (IITRAM)AhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology SilcharSilcharIndia
  3. 3.Aurel Vlaicu University of AradAradRomania

Personalised recommendations