Skip to main content

Institutional Performance, Institutional Change, and Building a Knowledge-Driven Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge-Driven Governance

Abstract

This chapter focuses on an evaluation of institutional performance, an analysis of institutional change, and an examination of a new model of a humanitarian society.

The Master said, ‘With one like Ts’ze (also translated as Ci), I can begin to talk about the odes. I told him one point, and he knew its proper sequence.’ (In Chinese: 子曰: “赐也, 始可与言《诗》已矣!告诸往而知来者。” (《论语·学而第一》)).

Confucian analects (1900, pp. 8–9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, I do not analyze the cases with unsuccessful governance results, because if their governance results are unsuccessful, their intuitional performance all will be characterized as “failure,” and then, it is not necessary to analyze their institutional resilience and sustainability.

  2. 2.

    Democracy index 2006 (Kekic 2007) stressed four regime types: full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, and authoritarian regimes.

  3. 3.

    In Introductory Note of The Doctrine of the Mean (Chong Yung, or Zhong Yong), Chengzi (Chû Hsî) said: “My master, the Philosopher Ch’ǎng (Zicheng in Chinese pinyin) says:—‘Being without inclination to either side is called CHUNG; admitting of no change is called is called Yung. By CHUNG is denoted the correct course to be pursed by all under heaven; by YUNG is denoted the fixed principle regulating all under heaven’” (The Doctrine of the Mean 1900, p. 246). In Chinese: 子程子曰: “不偏之谓中; 不易之谓庸。中者, 天下之正道。庸者, 天下之定理。” (《中庸》).

References

  • Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica, 21(4), 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1935). The two sources of morality and religion (Trans. by R. A. Audra & C. Brereton with the assistance of W. H. Carter). New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette, J. (1980). Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government. In R. A. Goldwin & W. A. Schambra (Eds), How democratic is the Constitution? (pp. 102–116). Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette, J. (1994). The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy & American national government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrer, F. A. J. (1999). Sustainability, democracy and socio-cybernetics. Kybernetes, 28(6/7), 810–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A., & Hughes, P. (2001). The identification and analysis of indicators of community strength and outcomes (Department of Family and Community Services Occasional Paper No. 3). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/vIA/occasional_papers/$file/No.3.pdf.

  • Brusoni, B., Prencipe, A., Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organization coupling, and the boundries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, P., & Calvert, P. (1999). The resilience of democracy: Persistent practice, durable Idea. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R., & Green, W. H. (1976). Economies of scale in US electric power generation source. The Journal of Political Economy, 84(4), 655–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Good Polity (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. R., & Levesque, H. J. (1991).Teamwork. Nous, 25(4), 487–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucian analects. (1900). In Zhushi jiaozheng huaying sishu (Si shu) (English & Chinese) (Trans. by J. Legge) (pp. 1–218). Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C., Bhattacharya, S., Gérard-Varet, L. (1998), Knowledge as a public good: efficient sharing and incentives for development effort. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 30(4), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. K. (2005). Indigenous knowledge and the desertification debate: Problematising expert knowledge in North Africa. Geoforum, 36(4), 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctrine of the mean. (1900). In Zhushi jiaozheng huaying sishu (Si shu) (English & Chinese) (Trans. by J. Legge) (pp. 246–298). Shanghai: Shang wu yin shu guan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28 (summer), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1960). The division of labor in society (Trans. by G. Simpson). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (Ed). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J. 2006. Sustainability and resilience—toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy (SSPP), 2(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, R. C. (1984). Juridical democracy & democratic values: An evaluation of Lowi’s alternative to interest-group liberalism. Polity, 16(3), 404–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. H. (1999). Evaluating the first U.S. consensus conference: The impact of the ‘citizens’ panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology and Human Values, 24(4), 451–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Trans. by W. Rehg). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A. (2008). The gridlock economy: How too much ownership wrecks markets, stops innovation, and costs lives. Philadelphia: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280 (5364), 698–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss, S. (2002). Toward the public sphere Reflections on the development of participatory technology assessment. Bulletin of Science, Technology & society, 22(3), 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekic, L. (2007). The economist intelligence unit’s index of democracy. Retrieved October 22, 2008, from http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/Democracy_Index_2007_v3.pdf.

  • Kiser, L. L., & Ostrom, E. (2000). The three world of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In M. D. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentric games and institutions: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 56–88). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, production differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ki (The book of rites) (Trans. by J. Legge). (1885). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (1989). An economic theory of institutional change: Induced and imposed change. Cato Journal, 9(1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959).The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindskog, P., & Tengberg, A. (1994). Land degradation, natural resources and local knowledge in the sahel zone of Burkina Faso. GeoJournal, 33(4), 365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1971a). The politics of disorder. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1971b). A reply to Mansfield. Public Policy, 19(winter), 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T J. (1979). The end of literalism: The second republic of the United States (2nd ed.). New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. D., & White, R. W. (1983). Economies of scale and economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions: A study of British Columbia Credit Unions. The Journal of Finance, 38(3), 887–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., &Thomas, R. P. (1970). An economic theory of the growth of the western world. The Economic History Review, 23(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World development, 24(6): 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday-Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., A. J. Dougill, & M. J. Taylor. (2007). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land desertification: Kalahari rangeland management options. Land Degradation and Development (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realistic view of democracy in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2005). Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability, and peace. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1965). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrianos, L. S. (1998). A global history: From prehistory to 21st century (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. Stern (Eds), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 308–325). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, L. C., & Reed, M. S. (2007). Land degradation assessment in Southern Africa: integrating local and scientific knowledge bases. Land Degradation & Development, 18(1), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Pittsburgh. (2002). SWPA community indicators handbook. Pittsburgh: Sustainable Pittsburgh. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from www.sustainablepittsburgh.org.

  • Tambe, M. (1997). Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7, 83–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(3), 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. S. G. (1997). Science and the desertification debate. Journal of Arid Environments, 37(4), 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. S. G., & Twyman, C. (2004). Good or bad rangeland? Hybrid knowledge, science, and local understandings of vegetation dynamics in the Kalahari. Land Degradation & Development, 15(3), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public administration review, 40(3), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2008). Wanmei quanmian chanpin guanli: Shehui jiegou he guanli de chanpin fenxi (Perfect total product management: A product analysis of social structure and management). Beijing: Beijing University Press, Beihang University Press (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihua Yang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, L. (2019). Institutional Performance, Institutional Change, and Building a Knowledge-Driven Society. In: Knowledge-Driven Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2910-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics