Skip to main content

Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics, AI and the Future of Law

Abstract

Identifying and then implementing an effective response to disruptive new AI technologies is enormously challenging for any business looking to integrate AI into their operations, as well as regulators looking to leverage AI-related innovation as a mechanism for achieving regional economic growth. These business and regulatory challenges are particularly significant given the broad reach of AI, as well as the multiple uncertainties surrounding such technologies and their future development and effects. This chapter identifies two promising strategies for meeting the “AI challenge,” focusing on the example of Fintech. First, “dynamic regulation,” in the form of regulatory sandboxes and other regulatory approaches that aim to provide a space for responsible AI-related innovation. An empirical study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that jurisdictions that adopt a more “proactive” approach to Fintech regulation can attract greater investment. The second strategy relates to so-called “innovation ecosystems.” It is argued that such ecosystems are most effective when they afford opportunities for creative partnerships between well-established corporations and AI-focused startups and that this aspect of a successful innovation ecosystem is often overlooked in the existing discussion. The chapter suggests that these two strategies are interconnected, in that greater investment is an important element in both fostering and signaling a well-functioning innovation ecosystem and that a well-functioning ecosystem will, in turn, attract more funding. The resulting synergies between these strategies can, therefore, provide a jurisdiction with a competitive edge in becoming a regional hub for AI-related activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a general introduction to Fintech, see Arner et al. (2016a, b), Haddad and Hornuff (2016) and MIT Sloan School of Management (2016). For a discussion of Fintech and investment-related issues and trends, see Fenwick et al. (2018).

  2. 2.

    See, generally, Fenwick and Vermeulen (2017).

  3. 3.

    For a general introduction, see JASON (2017).

  4. 4.

    See Beck (1992).

  5. 5.

    See Bennett Moses (2011).

  6. 6.

    See Arbesman (2016).

  7. 7.

    See, e.g., Black et al. (2007), Black (2009) and Kaal (2013, 2014).

  8. 8.

    Callon et al. (2009).

  9. 9.

    Calliess and Zumbansen (2010).

  10. 10.

    Sachs (2011), p. 1298; see also Sunstein (2005).

  11. 11.

    See Financial Conduct Authority (2015).

  12. 12.

    Mandel (2013), pp. 45 and 136; see, generally, Marchant and Wallach (2013).

  13. 13.

    See Fenwick and Vermeulen (2015b).

  14. 14.

    See, e.g., Hwang and Horowitt (2012).

  15. 15.

    See, e.g., Lerner (2002).

  16. 16.

    Hwang and Horowitt (2012), p. 10.

  17. 17.

    Feld (2016).

  18. 18.

    Case (2017); for a similar argument, see Fenwick and Vermeulen (2016).

  19. 19.

    See Vermeulen (2018).

  20. 20.

    See Fenwick and Vermeulen (2015a).

  21. 21.

    Interview with Maya Grossman, Head of Global Communications, Microsoft Accelerator (Tilburg-Tel Aviv, December 7, 2016).

  22. 22.

    Costa Program (2016).

References

  • Arbesman, S. (2016). Overcomplicated: Technology at the limits of comprehension. New York: Current.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arner, D., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2016a). The evolution of Fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm? UNSW Law Research Paper No. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arner, D., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2016b). FinTech, RegTech and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett Moses, L. (2011). Agents of change: How the law ‘copes’ with technological change. Griffith Law Review, 20, 763–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Hopper, M., & Band, C. (2007). Making a success of principles-based regulation. Law & Financial Markets Review, 1, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (2009). Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation. Available via LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23103/1/WPS2008-13.pdf/. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Calliess, G. P., & Zumbansen, P. (2010). Rough consensus & running code: A theory of transnational private law. London: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Lasoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, S. (2017). The third wave: An entrepreneur’s vision of the future. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Program. (2016). The COSTA programme: Bringing corporates and start-ups together. http://www.brainport.nl/en/news-developments/costa-moet-start-ups-en-bedrijven-verbinden. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Feld, B. (2016). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, M., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2015a). The new firm: Staying relevant, unique & competitive. European Business Organization Law Review, 16, 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, M., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2015b). Alternatives to silicon valley: Building global business anywhere. EUIJ-Kyushu Review, 5, 27–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, M., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2016). Global startup communities. In Stichting Maatschappij en Onderneming. http://smo.nl/global-start-up-communities/. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Fenwick M, Vermeulen EPM (2017) How to respond to artificial intelligence in Fintech. Japan Spotlight, July/August, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2018). Fintech and the financing of SMEs and entrepreneurs: From crowdfunding to marketplace lending. In D. Cumming & L. Hornuf (Eds.), The economics of crowdfunding: Startups, portals & investor behavior. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Conduct Authority. (2015). Regulatory sandbox. Available via UK Financial Conduct Authority https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf/. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Haddad, C., & Hornuff, L. (2016). The emergence of the Global Fintech Market: Economic and technological determinants. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, V. W., & Horowitt, G. (2012). The rainforest. Los Alto Hills: Regenweld.

    Google Scholar 

  • JASON. (2017). Artificial Intelligence for Health & Health Care https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/jsr-17-task002_aiforhealthandhealthcare12122017.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Kaal, W. A. (2013). Dynamic regulation of the financial services industry. Wake Forest Law Review, 48, 791–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaal, W. A. (2014). Evolution of law: Dynamic regulation in a new institutional economics framework. In W. A. Kaal, M. Schmidt, & A. Schartz (Eds.), Festschrift Zu Ehren von Christian Kirchner. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, L. (2002). When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective public venture capital schemes. The Economic Journal, 112, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, G. N. (2013). Emerging technology governance. In G. E. Marchant, K. W. Abbot, & B. Allenby (Eds.), Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. W., & Wallach, W. (2013). Governing the governance of emerging technologies. In G. E. Marchant, K. W. Abbot, & B. Allenby (Eds.), Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. London: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MIT Sloan School of Management. (2016). Fintech platforms & strategy. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5183-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S. N. (2011). Rescuing the strong precautionary principle from its critics. University Illinois Law Review, 1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2005). The precautionary principle as a basis for decision making. Economists’ Voice, 2, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2018). Capital markets union: Why venture capital is not the answer to Europe’s innovation challenge. In D. Busch, G. Ferrarini, & E. Avgouleas (Eds.), Capital markets union in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Fenwick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fenwick, M., Vermeulen, E.P.M., Corrales, M. (2018). Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology. In: Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., Forgó, N. (eds) Robotics, AI and the Future of Law. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2873-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2874-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics