Advertisement

Performance Comparison of the Three Numerical Methods to Discretize the Local Inertial Equation for Stable Shallow Water Computation

  • Tomohiro Tanaka
  • Hidekazu YoshiokaEmail author
  • Sokly Siev
  • Hideto Fujii
  • Ly Sarann
  • Chihiro Yoshimura
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 946)

Abstract

The local inertial equation (LIE) is a simple shallow water model for simulating surface water dynamics. Recently, the model has been widely applied to flood simulation worldwide. Keys in numerical implementation of the LIE are the staggered spatio-temporal discretization and the stable treatment of the friction slope terms. The latter is critical for stable and efficient computation. Currently, several discretization methods (semi-implicit, fully-implicit, and exponential methods) for the friction slope terms with comparable computational efficiency are available. However, their performance evaluation has been carried out only independently. We thus compare the performance of the three methods through their application to test and realistic cases. In this paper, firstly, theoretical linear stability analysis results are reviewed, indicating the highest stability of the implicit method. It is also consistent in a certain sense. Application of these methods to a 1-D test case with an advancing wet and dry interface implies that all the methods work well where the fully-implicit method has the least error. Their application to 2-D flood simulation in Tonle Sap Lake and its floodplains in South-East Asia demonstrates that the exponential method gives slightly more oscillatory results than the others. Dependence of the simulated surface water dynamics on the spatial resolution is investigated as well to give a criterion of the resolution for numerical simulation with satisfactory accuracy.

Keywords

Local inertial equation Finite difference scheme Friction slope term Tonle Sap Lake 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by SATREPS project “Establishment of Environmental Conservation Platform of Tonle Sap Lake” and JSPS research grant No. 17K15345.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller, C.T., et al.: Numerical simulation of water resources problems: models, methods, and trends. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 405–437 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, P.D., Horritt, M.S., Fewtrell, T.J.: A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. J. Hydrol. 387(1–2), 33–45 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunter, N.M., Bates, P.D., Horritt, M.S., Wilson, M.D.: Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 90(3), 208–225 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martins, R., Leandro, J., Djordjević, S.: A well balanced Roe scheme for the local inertial equations with an unstructured mesh. Adv. Water Resour. 83, 351–363 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanaka, T., Yoshioka, H.: Numerical stability analysis of the local inertial equation with semi- and fully implicit friction term treatments: assessment of the maximum allowable time step. J. Adv. Simul. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 162–175 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshioka, H., Tanaka, T.: On mathematics of the 2-D local inertial model for flood simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Conservation and Management of Tropical Lakes, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 24–26 August 2017, pp. 30–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Almeida, G.A., Bates, P.: Applicability of the local inertial approximation of the shallow water equations to flood modeling. Water Resour. Res. 49(8), 4833–4844 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martins, R., Leandro, J., Chen, A.S., Djordjević, S.: A comparison of three dual drainage models: shallow water vs local inertial vs diffusive wave. J. Hydroinform. 19(3), 331–348 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamazaki, D., Almeida, G.A., Bates, P.D.: Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector-based river network map. Water Resour. Res. 49(11), 7221–7235 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Godunov, S.K.: A difference scheme for numerical solution of discontinuous solution of hydrodynamic equations. Math. Sbornik 47, 271–306 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka, T., Yoshioka, H.: Applicability of the 2-D local inertial equations to long-term hydrodynamic simulation of the Tonle Sap Lake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Conservation and Management of Tropical Lakes, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 24–26 August 2017, pp. 23–29 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kummu, M., et al.: Water balance analysis for the Tonle Sap Lake-floodplain system. Hydrol. Process. 28(4), 1722–1733 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, D., Oki, T., Herath, S., Musiake, K.: A hillslope-based hydrological model using catchment area and width functions. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47, 49–65 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujii, H., et al.: Hydrological roles of the Cambodian floodplain of the Mekong river. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 1(3), 253–266 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kummu, M., Penny, D., Sarkkula, J., Koponen, J.: Sediment: curse or blessing for Tonle Sap Lake? AMBIO 37(3), 158–163 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanny, L., Jiwen, G., Seingheng, H.: Phnom Penh’s municipal drinking water supply: water quality assessment. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 1(1), 27–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomohiro Tanaka
    • 1
  • Hidekazu Yoshioka
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sokly Siev
    • 3
  • Hideto Fujii
    • 4
  • Ly Sarann
    • 5
  • Chihiro Yoshimura
    • 3
  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Shimane UniversityMatsueJapan
  3. 3.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Yamagata UniversityTsuruokaJapan
  5. 5.Institute of Technology of CambodiaPhnom PenhCambodia

Personalised recommendations