Advertisement

Wise-Use of Sediment for River Restoration: Numerical Approach via HJBQVI

  • Hidekazu YoshiokaEmail author
  • Yuta Yaegashi
  • Yumi Yoshioka
  • Kunihiko Hamagami
  • Masayuki Fujihara
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 946)

Abstract

A stochastic differential game for cost-effective restoration of river environment based on sediment wise-use, an urgent environmental issue, is formulated. River restoration here means extermination of harmful algae in dam downstream. The algae population has weak tolerance against turbid river water flow, which is why the sediment is focused on in this paper. Finding the optimal strategy of the sediment transport reduces to solving a spatio-temporally 4-D Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Quasi-Variational Inequality (HJBQVI): a degenerate nonlinear and nonlocal parabolic problem. Solving the HJBQVI is carried out with a specialized finite difference scheme based on an exponentially-fitted discretization with penalization, which generates stable numerical solutions. An algorithm for solving the discretized HJBQVI without resorting to the conventional iterative matrix inversion methods is then presented. The HJBQVI is applied to a real problem in a Japanese river where local fishery cooperatives and local government have been continuing to debate the way of using some stored sediment in a diversion channel for flood mitigation. Our computational results indicate when and how much amount of the sediment should be applied to the river restoration, which can be useful for their decision-making.

Keywords

River environment Finite difference scheme Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Quasi-Variational inequality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

JSPS Research Grant No. 17K15345 and No. 17J09125 support this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Mori, T., Onoda, Y., Kayaba, Y.: Geographical patterns of flow-regime alteration by flood-control dams in Japan. Limnology 19(1), 53–67 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rolls, R.J., Bond, N.R.: Environmental and ecological effects of flow alteration in surface water ecosystems. In: Water for the Environment, pp. 65–82. Academic Press, US (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McManamay, R.A., Frimpong, E.A.: Hydrologic filtering of fish life history strategies across the United States: implications for stream flow alteration. Ecol. Appl. 25(1), 243–263 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tonkin, J.D., Merritt, D.M., Olden, J.D., Reynolds, L.V., Lytle, D.A.: Flow regime alteration degrades ecological networks in riparian ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2(1), 86–93 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoshioka, H., Yaegashi, Y.: Robust stochastic control modeling of dam discharge to suppress overgrowth of downstream harmful algae. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 34(3), 338–354 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshioka, H., Yaegashi, Y.: Singular stochastic control model for algae growth management in dam downstream. J. Biol. Dyn. 12(1), 242–270 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibáñez, C., et al.: Regime shift from phytoplankton to macrophyte dominance in a large river: top-down versus bottom-up effects. Sci. Total Environ. 416, 314–1322 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nozaki, K., Uchida, A.: Blooms of filamentous green algae in river ecosystem. Yahagi River Res. 4, 159–168 (2000). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luce, J.J., Steele, R., Lapointe, M.F.: A physically based statistical model of sand abrasion effects on periphyton biomass. Ecol. Model. 221(2), 353–361 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luce, J.J., Lapointe, M.F., Roy, A.G., Ketterling, D.B.: The effects of sand abrasion of a predominantly stable stream bed on periphyton biomass losses. Ecohydrology 6(4), 689–699 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tealdi, S., Camporeale, C., Ridolfi, L.: Inter-species competition–facilitation in stochastic riparian vegetation dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 318, 13–21 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hansen, L., Sargent, T.J.: Robust control and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 60–66 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forsyth, P.A., Vetzal, K.R.: Numerical methods for nonlinear PDEs in finance. In: Duan, J.C., Härdle, W., Gentle, J. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Finance. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, pp. 503–528. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17254-0_18CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Øksendal, B., Sulem, A.: Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/b137590CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grigoriu, M.: Noise-induced transitions for random versions of Verhulst model. Probabilistic Eng. Mech 38, 136–142 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lungu, E.M., Øksendal, B.: Optimal harvesting from a population in a stochastic crowded environment. Math. Biosci. 145(1), 47–75 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bian, B., Dai, M., Jiang, L., Zhang, Q., Zhong, Y.: Optimal decision for selling an illiquid stock. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 151(2), 402–417 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, Z., Forsyth, P.A.: Pricing hydroelectric power plants with/without operational restrictions: a stochastic control approach. In: Nonlinear Models in Mathematical Finance, pp. 253–281 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoshioka, H., Unami, K., Fujihara, M.: Mathematical analysis on a conforming finite element scheme for advection-dispersion-decay equations on connected graphs. J. JSCE 70(2), I_265–I_274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoshioka, H., Tsugihashi, K., Yaegashi, Y.: Finite difference computation of a stochastic aquaculture problem under incomplete information. In: Seventh Conference on Finite Difference Methods (Abstract accepted)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kossaczký, I., Ehrhardt, M., Günther, M.: On the non-existence of higher order monotone approximation schemes for HJB equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 52, 53–57 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomas, L.H.: Elliptic problems in linear difference equations over a network. In: Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory Report. Columbia University, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshioka, H., Yaegashi, Y.: Optimization model to start harvesting in stochastic aquaculture system. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 33, 476–493 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshioka, H., Yaegashi, Y., Tsugihashi, K., Watanabe, T.: An adaptive management model for benthic algae under large uncertainty and its application to Hii River. Adv. River Eng. 24, 291–296 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pham, H.: Continuous-time Stochastic Control and Optimization with Financial Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89500-8CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shimane UniversityMatsueJapan
  2. 2.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Tottori UniversityTottoriJapan
  5. 5.Iwate UniversityMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations