Dynamic Optimization of Two-Coil Power-Transfer System Using L-Section Matching Network for Magnetically Coupled Intrabody Communication

  • Kenichi ItoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 946)


This study examined a novel intrabody communication method using magnetic coupling. For designing transceivers utilizing this communication method, it is important to understand the power-transfer characteristic between the sending and receiving coils of the transceivers and to develop a technique for maximizing the transceiver efficiency. This study targeted a two-coil wireless power-transfer system with an L-section matching network. The maximum power-transfer efficiency (PTE)—0.53—was achieved by adjusting the matching network under a carrier frequency of 2 MHz and a mutual inductance of 14.7 nH (coupling coefficient = 0.006). Additionally, by dynamically estimating the mutual inductance between the sending and receiving coils, the optimum PTE with respect to the positional relation was shown to be achievable. The proposed wireless power-transfer system is promising as a magnetic intrabody communication system.


Intrabody communication Magnetic coupling Matching network 



This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18K12152.


  1. 1.
    Zimmerman, T.G.: Personal area networks: near-field intrabody communication. IBM Syst. J. 35(3–4), 609–617 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seyedi, M.-H., Kibret, B., Lai, D.T.H., Faulkner, M.: A survey on intrabody communications for body area network applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(8), 2067–2079 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naranjo-Hernandez, D., Callejon-Leblic, A., Lucev Vasic, Z., Seyedi, M., Gao, Y.-M.: Past results, present trends, and future challenges in intrabody communication. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 39 p. (2018). Article ID 9026847Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, J., Mercier, P.: Magnetic human body communication. In: 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1841–1843 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogasawara, T., Sasaki, A., Fujii, K., Morimura, H.: Human body communication based on magnetic coupling. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62(2), 804–813 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rocke, S., Persad, J.: Analysis of magnetically-coupled human body communications. In: 2015 COMSOL Conference in Boston, 5 p. (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernandez-Gomez, Y.K., Alvarez-Botero, G.A., Rodriguez, J.B., de Sousa, F.R.: Magnetic human body communication based on double-inductor coupling. In: 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 6 p. (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ito, K.: Signal path loss simulation of magnetically-coupled intra-body communication: an examination of a variety of magnetic couplings. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Simul. Technol. 9(4), 85–93 (2017). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannon, B.L., Hoburg, J.F., Stancil, D.D., Goldstein, S.C.: Magnetic resonant coupling as a potential means for wireless power transfer to multiple small receivers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 24(7), 1819–1825 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seo, D.-W., Lee, J.-H., Lee, H.S.: Study on two-coil and four-coil wireless power transfer systems using Z-parameter approach. ETRI J. 38(3), 568–578 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ito, K.: Power transmission optimization simulation for magnetically coupled intra-body communication. In: The 36th JSST Annual International Conference on Simulation Technology, pp. 210–213 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pozar, D.M.: Microwave Engineering, pp. 229–234. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Niigata Institute of TechnologyKashiwazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations