Abstract
In the second half of 2016, a heated debate attracted widespread attention in China. Two eminent economists, Prof. Justin Yi-Fu Lin, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, and Prof. Wei-Ying Zhang, former Dean of the Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, thoroughly debated the effectiveness of industrial policy (reports). Putting this debate in a larger context, it originates from the growing concerns with China’s development strategy. Looking back, China’s economic success has greatly benefited from its heavy state intervention. But looking forward, China is likely to be caught in the “middle-income trap,” given the slowdown in growth rates and draining in production factors in recent years. So, shall China stick to its old state-led development strategy (Lin’s suggestion) or shift to the market-enhancing approach (Zhang’s point)?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The debate is on the Sina Website, http://finance.sina.com.cn/focus/lyfvszwy/.
- 2.
The development model of these countries is called “Developmental State” which was prevailing between the 1980s and 1990s. See Johnson, MITI and The Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975; Amsden, Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization; Wade, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization; Woo-Cumings, The Developmental State.
- 3.
See Minns, “Of Miracles and Models: The Rise and Decline of the Developmental State in South Korea”; Cherry, “‘Big Deal’ or Big Disappointment? The Continuing Evolution of the South Korean Developmental State”; Pirie, The Korean Developmental State: From Dirigisme to Neo-Liberalism; Radice, “The Developmental State under Global Neo-Liberalism”; Chu, “Eclipse or Reconfigured? South Korea’s Developmental State and Challenges of the Global Knowledge Economy”; Stubbs, “What Ever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate.”
- 4.
Some scholars hold the same argument, such as Oi, “The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy”; Leftwich, “Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State”; Unger & Chan, “Corporatism in China: A Developmental State in an East Asian Context”, some don’t agree with us, such as Breslin, “China: Developmental State or Dysfunctional Development?”
- 5.
See Johnson, MITI and The Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975.
- 6.
See Amsden, Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization; Wade, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization; Huff, “The Developmental State, Government, and Singapore’s Economic Development since 1960.”
- 7.
White, Developmental States in East Asia.
- 8.
See Johnson, MITI and The Japanese Miracle; White, “Developmental State and socialist Industrialization in the Third World”; Amsden, Asia’s Next Gian; Wade, Governing the Market; Öniş, “The Logic of the Developmental State.”
- 9.
List, The National System of Political Economy.
- 10.
Amsden, Asia’s Next Gian, 139–155.
- 11.
See Johnson, MITI and The Japanese Miracle; Evans, Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation 1995.
- 12.
Lin et al., The China miracle: Development strategy and economic reform.
- 13.
Tsai, “Off Balance: The Unintended Consequences of Fiscal Federalism in China”; Breslin, China: Developmental State or Dysfunctional Development?”
- 14.
Harding, China’s Second Revolution: Reform after Mao; Baum, Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping.
- 15.
Li and Zhou, “Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China.”
- 16.
White, The Chinese State in the Era of Economic Reform; Oi, “The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy”; Blecher & Shue, Tethered Deer: Government and Economy in a Chinese County.
- 17.
Whittaker et al., “Compressed development.”
- 18.
Zhu, “Compressed development, flexible practices, and multiple traditions in China’s rise.”
- 19.
Zweig, Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests and Global Linkages.
- 20.
Krugman, “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle.”
- 21.
Vestal, Planning for Change: Industrial Policy and Japanese Economic Development, 1945–1990.
References
Amsden, A., Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Baum, R., Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping, Princeton University Press, 1996.
Blecher, M. J., & V. Shue, Tethered Deer: Government and Economy in a Chinese County, Stanford University Press, 1996.
Breslin, S. G., “China: Developmental State or Dysfunctional Development?” Third World Quarterly 17, No. 4 (1996): 689–706.
Cherry, J., “‘Big Deal’ or Big Disappointment? The Continuing Evolution of the South Korean Developmental State,” Pacific Review 18, No. 3 (2005): 327–354.
Chu, Yin-wah, “Eclipse or Reconfigured? South Korea’s Developmental State and Challenges of the Global Knowledge Economy,” Economy and Society 38, No. 2 (2009): 278–303.
Evans, P., Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Harding, H., China’s Second Revolution: Reform after Mao, Brookings Institution Press, 1987.
Huff, W. G., “The Developmental State, Government, and Singapore’s Economic Development since 1960,” World Development 23, No. 8 (1995): 1421–1438.
Johnson, C., MITI and The Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1982.
Krugman, P., “The myth of Asia’s miracle.” Foreign Affairs 73, No. 6 (1994): 62–78.
Leftwich, A., “Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State,” Journal of Development Studies 31, No. 3 (1995): 400–427.
Li, Hongbin, & Li-An Zhou, “Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China”, Journal of Public Economics 89 (2005): 1743–1762.
Lin, Justin Yifu, Fang Cai, & Zhou Li, The China miracle: Development strategy and economic reform. Chinese University Press, 2003.
List, Friedrich, National system of political economy: The Two Narratives of Political Economy. New York: Wiley, 2011.
Minns, J., “Of Miracles and Models: The Rise and Decline of the Developmental State in South Korea”, Third World Quarterly 22, No. 6 (2001): 1025–1043.
Oi, J. C., “The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy,” China Quarterly 144 (1995): 1132–1149.
Öniş, Ziya, “The Logic of the Developmental State,” Comparative Politics 24, No. 1 (1991): 109–126.
Pirie, I., The Korean Developmental State: From Dirigisme to Neo-Liberalism. Routledge, 2007.
Radice, H., “The Developmental State under Global Neo-Liberalism,” Third World Quarterly 29, No. 6 (2008): 1153–1174.
Stubbs, R., “What Ever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate,” Pacific Review 22, No. 1 (2009): 1–22.
Tsai, K.S., “Off Balance: The Unintended Consequences of Fiscal Federalism in China,” Journal of Chinese Political Science 9, No. 2 (2004): 7–26.
Unger, J., & A. Chan, “Corporatism in China: A Developmental State in an East Asian Context,” in Jonathan Unger & Anita Chan eds., China after Socialism: In the Footsteps of Eastern Europe or East Asia, M. E. Sharpe (1996): 95–129.
Vestal, J., Planning for Change: Industrial Policy and Japanese Economic Development, 1945–1990, Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.
Wade, R., Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
White, G., “Developmental State and socialist Industrialization in the Third World”, Journal of Development Studies 21, No. 1 (1984): 97–120.
White, G., ed., Developmental States in East Asia, Springer, 1988.
White, G., ed., The Chinese State in the Era of Economic Reform: The Road to Crisis, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1991.
Whittaker, D. Hugh, et al., “Compressed development,” Studies in Comparative International Development 45, No. 4 (2010): 439–467.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed., The Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Zhu, Tianbiao, “Compressed development, flexible practices, and multiple traditions in China’s rise.” Sinicization and the rise of China: Civilizational processes beyond East and West (2012): 99–119.
Zweig, D., Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests and Global Linkages, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, W., Keng, S. (2019). China’s Developmental State in Transition: In Light of the East Asian Experiences. In: Yu, J., Guo, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Local Governance in Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2799-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2799-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2798-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2799-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)