Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Practical Approach to Teaching Agile Methodologies and Principles at Tertiary Level Using Student-Centred Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning

Abstract

This chapter presents a practical approach to better understand agile methodologies and principles in an educational context. An overview of the main agile principles is given along with agile methodologies that can be taught and applied in the classroom at tertiary level. The main objective is to train final year university students with agile practices currently used by the software industry. Apart from traditional activities such as homework, tests, assignments and lectures, practical approaches have been incorporated into the curriculum to engage students in active learning. In this context, the activities which were planned have been validated against agile practices at Infosys Ltd., a leading Indian-based IT company having a branch in Mauritius. In this chapter, the main focus is how team-based activities and student-centred group work have helped university students learn, understand and apply agile concepts such as Scrum, User Stories, Extreme Programming (XP), Lean, Kanban and Test-Driven Development (TDD).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AgileApex [Computer software]. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.agileapex.com.

  • Ahmad, M., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2013). Kanban in software development: A systematic literature review. In 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Carmichael, A. (2016). Essential Kanban condensed. Blue Hole Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anslow, C., & Maurer, F. (2015). An experience report at teaching a group based agile software development project course. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education—SIGCSE ‘15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astels, D., Miller, G., & Novak, M. (2002). The practical guide to extreme programming. Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahceci, D., & Holmgren, L. (2014). Agile perspectives in construction projects—How to improve efficiency in the design phase (Postgraduate). School of Architecture and the Built Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barza, A., Cardozo, E. S., França, A. C., Neto, J. B., & Silva, F. Q. (2010). SCRUM and productivity in software projects: A systematic literature review. EASE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battou, A. (2017). Designing an adaptive learning system based on a balanced combination of agile learner design and learner. Centered approach. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 37(1), 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. (1999). Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer, 32(10), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersema, M. (2011). The Scrum Ball Point Game—Tennis, anyone?. Lean simulations. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://www.leansimulations.org/2011/08/scrum-ball-point-game-tennis-anyone.html.

  • Boersema, M. (2012). Lean Paper Airplane Game Instructions. Lean simulations. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://www.leansimulations.org/2012/10/lean-paper-airplane-game-instructions.html.

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning; creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, S., & Romero, P. (2006). XP and pair programming practices. PPIG Newsletter, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buildbettersoftware—Trello Guide. (2018). Using Trello for agile software development: The complete guide. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://buildbettersoftware.com/trello-for-software-development.

  • Cervone, H. (2011). Understanding agile project management methods using Scrum. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 27(1), 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2004). User stories applied. For agile software development. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collabedit. (2016). Collabedit—Online text editor. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://collabedit.com.

  • Corona, E., & Pani, F. E. (2013). A review of Lean-Kanban approaches in the software development. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 10(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, I., Xambre, A. R., & Lopes, R. B. (2013). A simulation game framework for teaching Lean production. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devedžić, V., & Milenković, S. (2011). Teaching agile software development: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(2), 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, M., & Rodrigues, P. (2015). Extreme pedagogy: An agile teaching-learning methodology for engineering education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(9), 828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogmus, H., Melnik, G., & Jeffries, R. (2010). Test-driven development. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Famuyide, S. (2017). Test-driven vs behaviour-driven development. Business analyst learnings. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from https://businessanalystlearnings.com/technology-matters/2014/8/13/test-driven-vs-behaviour-driven-development.

  • Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, K. (2015). LEGO Scrum City. Plays-In-Business. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://www.plays-in-business.com/lego-scrum-city.

  • Heikkilä, V., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Teaching university students Kanban with a collaborative board game. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion—ICSE ‘16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2008). Agile project management. In New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (pp. 218–221).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2010). Organizing self-organizing teams. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering—ICSE ‘10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, A., & Succi, G. (2014). Lean software development in action. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D., & Saiedian, H. (2005). Test-driven development concepts, taxonomy, and future direction. Computer, 38(9), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JUnit 5. (2018). Junit.org. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://junit.org.

  • Jyothi, V. E., & Rao, K. N. (2012). Effective implementation of agile practices-in coordination with Lean Kanban. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 4(1), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanban Pizza Game. (2013). agile42—The agile coaching company. Retrieved March 31, 2018, from https://www.agile42.com/en/training/kanban-pizza-game/.

  • Keefe, K., Sheard, J., & Dick, M. (2006, January). Adopting XP practices for teaching object oriented programming. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education (Vol. 52, pp. 91–100).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerievsky, J. (2001). PairDraw—Industrial Logic. Industrial Logic. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from https://www.industriallogic.com/blog/pairdraw-2.

  • Knepper, T. (2017). Agile apex introduction video. Learn agile provided by Agilest.org. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://learn.agilest.org/project-management/agile-apex-introduction-video.

  • Kollanus, S., & Isomöttönen, V. (2008). Test-driven development in education: Experiences with critical viewpoints. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(3), 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, M., & Meier, A. (2013). Teaching agile software development at university level: Values, management, and craftsmanship. In 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuswami, S., Vivekanandan, K., Ramaswamy, P., & Rodrigues, P. (2003). The effects of individual XP practices on software development effort. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28(6), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen, V., Itkonen, J., Isomöttönen, V., & Kollanus, S. (2010). ComTest. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education—Iticse ‘10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, L., & Jeffries, R. (2004). Extreme programming and agile software development methodologies. Information Systems Management, 21(3), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T., Herold, M., Bolinger, J., Deshpande, S., Bihari, T., Ramanathan, J., & Ramnath, R. (2011). An agile boot camp: Using a LEGO-based active game to ground agile development principles. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalakshmi, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2013). Traditional SDLC vs scrum methodology—A comparative study. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(6), 192–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto for Agile Software Development. (2001). Agile manifesto. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org.

  • McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H. E., & Fernald, J. (2006). Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Communications of the ACM, 49(8), 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions For Teaching And Learning, 2008(116), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M., & Tichy, W. (2001) Case study: Extreme programming in a university environment. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’hEocha, C., & Conboy, K. (2010). The role of the user story agile practice in innovation. In Lean Enterprise Software and Systems (pp. 20–30).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Overall Equipment Effectiveness. (2017). Leanproduction.com. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from https://www.leanproduction.com/oee.html.

  • Paasivaara, M., Heikkilä, V., Lassenius, C., & Toivola, T. (2014). Teaching students scrum using LEGO blocks. In Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering—ICSE Companion 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. (2014). User story mapping: Discover the whole story, build the right product. O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, M., & Cusumano, M. (2012). Lean software development: A tutorial. IEEE Software, 29(5), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2007). Implementing Lean software development: From concept to cash. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003). Lean software development. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K. (1997). SCRUM development process. Business Object Design and Implementation, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacco, J., & Pugh, W. (2006). Helping students appreciate test-driven development (TDD). In Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications—OOPSLA ‘06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svitis, C. (2013). Lean software development: Theory validation in terms of cost reduction and quality improvement. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis, University of Gothenburg, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, B. (2013). Kanban Pizza Game at Agile Development Conference East 2013. agile42—The Agile Coaching company. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://www.agile42.com/en/blog/2013/10/01/kanban-pizza-game-agile-development-conference-east-2013.

  • Unified Agile & DevOps. (2018). VersionOne. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://www.versionone.com.

  • Waters, K. (2011). Agile Games—ball point game | 101 Ways. 101 Ways Blog. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from https://www.101ways.com/agile-games-ball-point-game/.

  • What is a Kanban Board?. (2018). LeanKit. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from https://leankit.com/learn/kanban/kanban-board.

  • Williams, L., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Ferzli, M., & Miller, C. (2002). In support of pair programming in the introductory computer science course. Computer Science Education, 12(3), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Til, R. P., Tracey, M. W., Sengupta, S., & Fliedner, G. (2009). Teaching Lean with an interdisciplinary problem-solving learning approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yenduri, S., & Perkins, A. (2006). Impact of using test-driven development: A case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice & Conference on Programming Languages and Compilers, SERP 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students of B.Sc. (Hons) Software Engineering Level 3 (both normal cohort and mixed-mode), who participated and provided their valuable input for the experiments during the University of Mauritius academic year 2016–2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Software and Information Systems, Faculty of Information, Communication & Digital Technologies, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius

    Visham Hurbungs & Soulakshmee Devi Nagowah

Authors
  1. Visham Hurbungs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soulakshmee Devi Nagowah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Visham Hurbungs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Mind Lab by Unitec, Auckland, New Zealand

    David Parsons

  2. Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier, New Zealand

    Kathryn MacCallum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hurbungs, V., Nagowah, S.D. (2019). A Practical Approach to Teaching Agile Methodologies and Principles at Tertiary Level Using Student-Centred Activities. In: Parsons, D., MacCallum, K. (eds) Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2750-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2751-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation