Abstract
In Argentina, the use of biomass for the production of biofuels capable of replacing fossil fuels has aroused great expectation. In the last decade, the production of biodiesel has tripled, and the rising trend continues supported by national legislation that soon will increase the blend mandates up to B20 and E25 (being now B10 and E12). However, there could be some environmental concerns associated with land use and especially with water use. In this chapter, we calculate the volume of water used and consumed in the production of rapeseed (Brassica napus) and soybean (Glycine max) for biodiesel, and the production of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) and cordgrass (Spartina argentinensis) for bioethanol in different regions of the country. The water footprint, as defined by the Water Footprint Network, is used as an indicator of water resources appropriation, and the ISO approach is followed to assess the impacts associated with the use of water. The volume of water associated with the production of cordgrass is lower than figures obtained by traditional sources of biomass in Argentina (soybean and sugarcane). Soybean is produced in the Pampean Region and it is recommended to optimize the management of water resources in that region to minimize competition with food products while on the opposite, there is the case of Spartina that is a native grass growing naturally in the Chaco Region and it uses water that does not compete with food or livestock feed. On the other hand, rapeseed has a high water footprint mainly as a consequence of the site where it is produced. For instance, considering the environmental fragility, it is recommended to avoid the production of biomass destined to bioenergy in the arid zones of the country. Therefore, our findings show that results are more dependent on the region where each biomass is grown, than on management practices or the amount and type of chemical inputs (fertilizers, pesticides). Further work, such as the accounting of water along the industrial phase of the biofuels, is needed to have the full picture of the water consumption issue in bioenergy production.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to the Hoekstra et al., blue water.
References
AAPRESID. (2017). Evolución de la superficie en siembra directa en Argentina. http://www.aapresid.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/aapresid.evolucionsuperficie_sd_argentina.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2018.
Acreche, M. M., & Valeiro, A. H. (2013). Greenhouse gasses emissions and energy balances of a non-vertically integrated sugar and ethanol supply chain: a case study in Argentina. Energy, 54, 146–154.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Amores, M. J., Mele, F. D., Jiménez, L., & Castells, F. (2013). Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Argentina. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(7), 1344–1357.
Argentine Sugar Center. (2018). Available at www.centroazucarero.com.ar. Accessed May 1, 2018.
Boulay, A. M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., et al. (2018). The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(2), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8.
Carré, Patrick, & Pouzet, André. (2014). Rapeseed market, worldwide and in Europe. OCL, 21(1), D102. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2013054.
Carneiro, M. L. N., Pradelle, F., Braga, S. L., Gomes, M. S. P., Martins, A. R. F., Turkovics, F., et al. (2017). Potential of biofuels from algae: Comparison with fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in Europe and Brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 632–653.
Chiu, Y.-W., Suh, S., Pfister, S., Hellweg, S., & Koehler, A. (2012). Measuring ecological impact of water consumption by bioethanol using life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0328-0.
Civit, B., Arena, A. P., Piastrellini, R., Curadelli, S., & Silva Colomer, J. (2011). Comparación entre la Huella Hídrica de biodiesel obtenido a partir de aceite de colza y aceite de soja. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Energías Renovables, 15. Printed in Argentina. ISSN 0329-5184.
Cremonez, P. A., Feroldi, M., Feiden, A., Teleken, J. G., Gris, D. J., Dieter, J., et al. (2015). Current scenario and prospects of use of liquid biofuels in South America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.064.
Daylan, B. (2016). Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel. Renewable Energy, 42, 1349–1361. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148115304754.
De Fraiture, C., Giordano, M., & Liao, Y. (2008). Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: Blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy, 10(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2008.054.
Dominguez-Faus, R., Powers, S., & Burken, J. (2009). The water footprint of biofuels: A drink or drive issue? Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 3005–3010.
Donato, L., Huerga, I., & Hilbert, A. 2008. Balance Energético de la Producción de Biodiesel a Partir de Aceite de Soja en la República Argentina, INTA Report No. IIR-BC-INF-08-08. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
European Comission 2017. Oilseeds and protein crops: Market situation. In Committee for the common organisation of agricultural markets. October 25, 2017.
Faist Emmenegger, M., Pfister, S., Koehler, A., de Giovanetti, L., Arena, A. P., & Zah, R. (2011). Taking into account water use impacts in the LCA of biofuels: An Argentinean case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(9), 869–877.
Feldman, S. R., Bisaro, V., & Lewis, J. P. (2004). Photosynthetic and growth responses to fire of the subtropical-temperate grass Spartina argentinensis Parodi. Flora, 199(6), 491–499.
Feldman, S. R., & Lewis, J. P. (2005). Effect of fire on the structure and diversity of a Spartina argentinensis tall grassland. Applied Vegetation Science, 8, 77–84.
Feldman, S. R., & Lewis, J. P. (2007). Effect of fire on Spartina argentinensis Parodi demographic characteristics. Wetlands, 27(4), 785–793.
Fernández, J. (2003). Energía de la biomasa. In J. M. de Juana (Ed.), Energías renovables para el desarrollo. Spain: Thompson-Paraninfo.
Gerbens-Leenes, P., & Hoekstra, A. (2009). The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecological Economics. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180090800339X.
Giancola, S. I., Morandi, J. L., Gatti, N., Di Giano, S., Dowbley, V., & Biaggi, C. (2012). Causas que afectan la adopción de tecnología en pequeños y medianos productores de caña de azúcar de la Provincia de Tucumán. Enfoque cualitativo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones INTA.
Global Yield Gap Data. (2018) http://www.yieldgap.org/brazil. Retrieved April 23, 2018.
Gnansounou, E., & Raman, J. (2016). Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products. Applied Energy, 161, 300–308.
Harris, T. M., Hottle, T. A., Soratana, K., Klane, J., & Landis, A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of sunflower cultivation on abandoned mine land for biodiesel production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(1), 182–195. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652615012846.
Hoekstra, A., & Chapagain, A. (2006). Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x.
Iriarte, L. (2008). Cultivo de Colza. Editores: Ing. Agr. Liliana Iriarte/Ing. Agr. Omar Valetti. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires: Tres Arroyos. INTA publicaciones Nacionales, Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow.
Iriarte, L., & López, Z. (2014). El cultivo de colza en Argentina. Situación actual y perspectivas. Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow (Convenio MAA-INTA). 11 p. [en línea] http://inta.gob.ar/documentos/el-cultivo-de-colza-en-argentina-situación-actual-y-perspectivas.
ISO 14046. (2014). Environmental management—Water footprint—Principles, requirements and guidelines.
Jorrat, M. M., Araujo, P. Z., & Mele, F. D. (2018). Sugarcane water footprint in the province of Tucumán, Argentina. Comparison between different management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 521–529.
Jozami, E., Sosa, L. L., & Feldman, S. R. (2013). Spartina argentinensis as feedstock for bioetanol. Applied Technologies and Innovations, 9(2), 37–44.
Lamers, P., McCormick, K., & Hilbert, J. (2008). The emerging liquid biofuel market in Argentina: Implications for domestic demand and international trade. Energy Policy, 36, 1479–1490.
Lewis, J. P., Pire, E. F., Prado, D. E., Stofella, S. L., Franceschi, E. A., & Carnevale, N. J. (1990). Plant communities and phytogeographical position of a large depression in the Great Chaco, Argentina. Vegetatio, 86, 25–38.
Martelloto, E. (2012). Potencialidad y limitantes del riego complementario. Segundo Seminario, Recursos Hídricos para el sector Rural, Argentina. September 11, 2012.
Martínez, A., Chargoy, J., Puerto, M., Suppen, N., Rojas, D., Alfaro, S. et al. (2016). Huella de Agua (ISO 14046) en América Latina, análisis y recomendaciones para una coherencia regional. Centro de Análisis de Ciclo de Vida y Diseño Sustentable CADIS, Embajada de Suiza en Colombia, Agencia Suiza para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo COSUDE. 90.
Ministerio de Energía y Minería-Presidencia de la Nación Argentina. (2017). Producción, ventas al mercado interno y exportaciones de biocombustibles. https://datos.minem.gob.ar/dataset/estadisticas-de-biodiesel-y-bioetanol. Accessed February 25, 2018.
Morales, M., Quintero, J., Conejeros, R., & Aroca, G. (2015). Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1349–1361.
Nemecek, T., Heil, A., Huguenin, O., Meier, S., Erzinger, S., Blaser, S., et al. (2007). Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Ecoinvent report No. 15, v2.0. Agroscope FAL Reckenholz and FAT Taenikon, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf.
Nilsalab, P., Gheewala, S. H., Mungkung, R., Perret, S. R., Silalertruksa, T., & Bonnet, S. (2017). Water demand and stress from oil palm-based biodiesel production in Thailand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1666–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1213-7.
Nishihara Hun, A. L., Mele, F. D., & Pérez, G. A. (2017). A comparative life cycle assessment of the sugarcane value chain in the province of Tucumán (Argentina) considering different technology levels. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(4), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1047-3.
Oliver, R. J., Finch, N. W., & Taylor, G. (2009). Second generation bioenergy crops and climate change: a review of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and drought on water use and implications for yield. GCB Bioenergy, 1, 97–114.
Oyarzabal, M., Clavijo, J., Oakley, L. J., Biganzoli, F., Tognetti, P., Barberis, I. M., et al. (2018). Unidades de Vegetación de Argentina. Ecología Austral, 28, 40–63.
Pfister, S., Curran, M., Koehler, A., & Hellweg Pfister, S. (2010). Trade-offs between land and water use: regionalized impacts of energy crops. https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/baug/ifu/eco-systems-design-dam/documents/downloads/ei99/ifu-esd-EI99-LCAfood2010_pfister.pdf.
Pfister, S., Koehler, A., & Hellweg, S. (2009). Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(11), 4098–4104. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802423e.
Piastrellini, R. (2015). Aportes a la determinación de la huella ambiental de biocombustibles en Argentina. Influencia de los sistemas de manejo de cultivos sobre el impacto del consumo de agua, del uso del suelo y de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero para el biodiesel de soja. PhD Thesis. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Mendoza, Argentina.
Piastrellini, R., Arena, A. P., & Civit, B. (2017). Energy life-cycle analysis of soybean biodiesel: Effects of tillage and water management. Energy, 126, 13–20.
Piastrellini, R., Civit, B., & Arena, A. P. (2015). Influence of Agricultural practices on biotic production potential and climate regulation potential. A case study for life cycle assessment of soybean (Glycine max) in Argentina. Sustainability, 7, 4386–4410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7044386.
REN 21. (2017). Renewables 2017. Global Status Report. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/17-8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2018.
RFA, Renewable Fuels Association (2017). Industry statistics. Available at www.ethanolrfa.org/resources/industry/statistics/#145409899-6479-8715d404-e546. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
Romero, E. R., Digonzelli, P. A., & Scandaliaris, J. (2009). Manual del Cañero. San Miguel de Tucumán: Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres.
Salinas, A., Martellotto, E., Giubergia, J. P., Álvarez, C., & Lovera, E. (2008). Soja: Evaluación de Cultivares con Riego Suplementario. http://www.elsitioagricola.com/articulos/salinas. Accessed March 12, 2018.
Sánchez Godoy, F. (2012). Potencial del cultivo de la chumbera (Opuntia ficus-indica (L) Miller) para la obtención de biocombustibles. PhD Thesis. ETSI Agrónomos, UPM. Madrid, España.
Silva Colomer, J. (2009). INFORME ANUAL. Proyecto Integrado “Apoyo al desarrollo sustentable de las empresas familiares y Pymes agropecuarias del Noreste de la provincia de Mendoza, basado en la diversificación productiva y el asociativismo” EEA Junin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agraria (INTA).
Silva Colomer, J., Castillo, J., Iriarte, L., & Villegas, N. (2010). Cultivo de colza bajo riego en Mendoza. INTA. https://inta.gob.ar/sites/…/script-tmp-cultivo_de_colza_bajo_riego_en_mendoza.pdf.
Souza, S. P., Seabra, J. E., & Nogueira, L. A. H. (2017). Feedstocks for biodiesel production: Brazilian and global perspectives. Biofuels, 1–24.
Spang, E. S., Moomaw, W. R., Gallagher, K. S., Kirshen, P. H., & Marks, D. H. (2014). The water consumption of energy production: an international comparison. Environmental Research Letters, 9(10), 1–14.
Thiyam-Holländer, U., Eskin, M., & Matthäus, B. (2013). Canola and rapeseed: Production, processing, food quality, and nutrition (p. 4). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 9781466513884. Retrieved November 25, 2015.
Timilsina, G., Chisari, O., & Romero, C. (2013). Economy-wide impacts of biofuels in Argentina. Energy Policy, 55, 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.060.
USDA. (2017a). GAIN report: Argentina biofuels annual. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. July 2017.
USDA. (2017b). GAIN report: Argentina sugar annual. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. April 2017.
USDA. (2018a). Sugar: World markets and trade. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, May 2018.
USDA. (2018b). Soybeans. data & analysis. Available in https://www.fas.usda.gov/commodities/soybeans. Accesed June 15, 2018.
USDA. (2018c). Department of agriculture. Economic Research Service. Available in https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/soybeans-oil-crops/canola.aspx. Accessed June 5, 2018.
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218–1230. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8.
Wu, M., Zhang, Z., & Chiu, Y. (2014). Life-cycle water quantity and water quality implications of biofuels. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-013-0001-2.
Yang, J., Xu, M., Zhang, X., Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., & Chen, Y. (2011). Life-cycle analysis on biodiesel production from microalgae: Water footprint and nutrients balance. Bioresource Technology, 102(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.017.
Acknowledgements
This study was addressed by three research groups belonging to National Universities and the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, in different regions of the country. Therefore, each one addressed a case of biomass source according to the conditions and aptitudes of the region considered.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Araujo, P. et al. (2019). The Water Footprint in Bioenergy—A Comparison of Four Biomass Sources to Produce Biofuels in Argentina. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Environmental Water Footprints. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2739-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2739-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2738-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2739-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)