Skip to main content

Farmers’ Participation in Managing Water for Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Governance: Challenges and Prospects

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

  • 666 Accesses

Abstract

India is expected to face a water gap of around 750 billion cubic metre (BCM) by year 2030. Experts suggest that this gap can be solved with ‘improving agriculture’s water efficiency and productivity’ only.

The environmental setting of irrigated agriculture has two important components: (i) irrigation delivery from major and medium irrigation projects and all related activities are fully managed by the government, and (ii) the number of small and marginal landholdings is exponentially increasing which are not economically viable for irrigated agriculture. The National Water Policy and the state water policies have, therefore, provided for farmers’ participation in irrigation management, commonly known as ‘participatory irrigation management (PIM)’ through constitution of Water Users’ Associations (WUAs). The Water Users’ Associations are envisaged as empowered local institutions with an interface with irrigation, agriculture and other agencies to serve the farmers through system maintenance, water distribution, recovery of service charges and providing the advantage of ‘economy of scale’ in irrigated agriculture system, particularly for small landholders through collective action.

Currently, some 24 states of India have adopted the PIM approach partly or fully by enacting specific PIM Acts or amending existing irrigation acts to provide for constitution of Water Users’ Associations (WUAs). According to the latest estimates, 93,668 Water Users’ Associations (WUAs) have been formed in India, covering an area of 17.84 million ha. But the success of WUAs in handling irrigation management has been mixed.

The paper examines the reasons for success and failure of Water Users’ Associations in India and concludes that the lacklustre performance of WUAs is not because the idea is wrong, but because the people implementing the participatory irrigation management (often irrigation/water resources/command area departments) have not understood the process right. There is enormous potential for saving water and increasing productivity of land and water in agriculture through formation and strengthening of WUAs in India. The paper discusses the core principles of water management and change management for creating robust WUAs which can positively impact the water use efficiency and productivity on the field plots managed by large numbers of smallholder farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/sustainability/latest_thinking/charting_our_water_future

  2. 2.

    The irrigation projects in India are classified into three categories: (i) major, (ii) medium and (iii) minor irrigation projects. Projects having more than 10,000 ha cultivable command area (CCA) are termed as major projects, the projects having more than 2000 ha (up to 10,000 ha) are termed medium projects and the projects below 2000 ha CCA are termed as minor projects.

  3. 3.

    Of India’s 58.5 m ha ultimate irrigation potential on major and medium projects, the irrigation potential created is 45.34 m ha and irrigation potential utilized is 34.66 m ha (Water and Related Statistics, December 2013, published by CWC, Government of India).

  4. 4.

    The report on the State of Indian Agriculture placed by the Government to the Rajya Sabha in March 2012, (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=80852).

  5. 5.

    The landholdings up to 1 ha are termed as marginal landholdings and between 1 and 2 ha are termed as small landholdings.

  6. 6.

    Original figure of 84,779 Nr. WUA /17842.20 thousand ha area covered adopted from Hand Book on Water and Related Statistics 2016 (page 65) published by CWC. The number of WUAs in UP (802 WUA) given in CWC publication is corrected to 9691 WUA by the author.

  7. 7.

    In India, particularly Northern India, land revenue and irrigation records are maintained in ‘Fasli year’; Fasli year is a 12-month period and is counted from July to June.

  8. 8.

    Study on design of Dharoi Dam vs Actual Command Area Irrigated (Impact of PIM in Right Bank Main Canal Area of Dharoi Dam), Research Report, December 2011, page 37 sponsored by DSC and Agha Khan Foundation.

  9. 9.

    Indian Network on Participatory Irrigation Management, Report on ‘Assessment of Successful Water Users’ Associations (WUAs) in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh to identify the factors of sustainability of PIM’ sponsored by NABARD, September 2015 (pages 62–66).

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his sincere thanks to his colleagues for valuable input and support during the course of preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, P.K. (2019). Farmers’ Participation in Managing Water for Agriculture. In: Singh, A., Saha, D., Tyagi, A. (eds) Water Governance: Challenges and Prospects. Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2700-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics