Geometric Considerations in Uniportal VATS

  • Luca Bertolaccini


As laparoscopy in the abdomen, Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) has represented the revolution of the surgical approach to the lungs. Compared to open thoracotomy, VATS has demonstrated a significant reduction in pain, time for recovery, complications, and, not least, an improvement in the daily quality of life. Uniportal VATS (UniVATS) may be seen as a further step of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, consisting in only one small incision allowing simultaneous introduction of instruments parallel to the thoracoscope through an ideal cylindrical space as vast as a surgeon’s finger-breadth without further dissection of the intercostal space. An enhanced hand-eye coordination to visualise and operate the thoracoscope-surgical instruments ensemble is required. In particular, the thoracoscope is handled to view the position of the instruments at any time during the procedure with simple zooming in or out. UniVATS geometric configuration of the approach is entirely different from the standard three-port VATS settings. The use of a single port favours a translational approach of VATS instruments along with a sagittal plane. The single port configuration enables the devices to move along two parallel lines on a plane approaching the target lesion from a craniocaudal perspective, and this allows to bring the effective fulcrum inside the chest in a way comparable to open surgery.


Uniportal VATS Geometry Lung cancer 


  1. 1.
    Anile M, Diso D, Mantovani S, Patella M, Russo E, Carillo C, et al. Uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: going directly from open surgery to a single port approach. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S641–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sihoe AD. The evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: implications for the practice of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S604–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rocco G, Martucci N, La Manna C, Jones DR, De Luca G, La Rocca A, et al. Ten-year experience on 644 patients undergoing single-port (Uniportal) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:434–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Terzi A. Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2934–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tu CC, Hsu PK. Global development and current evidence of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:S308–18.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez-Rivas D, Yang Y, Sekhniaidze D, Stupnik T, Fernandez R, Lei J, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchoplastic and carinal sleeve procedures. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:S210–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fieira Costa E, Delgado Roel M, Paradela de la Morena M, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fernandez-Prado R, de la Torre M. Technique of Uniportal VATS major pulmonary resections. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S660–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, de la Torre M, Mendez L, Fernandez R. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy and other complex resections. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S674–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, Mendez L, Fernandez R, de la Torre M. Is Uniportal thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for advanced stages of non-small cell lung cancer? J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:641–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lyscov A, Obukhova T, Ryabova V, Sekhniaidze D, Zuiev V, Gonzalez-Rivas D. Double-sleeve and carinal resections using the Uniportal VATS technique: a single centre experience. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:S235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Elizabeth S, Sang AL, Véronique I. Beyond core knowledge: natural geometry. Cogn Sci. 2010;34:863–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maina JN. Is the sheet-flow design a ‘frozen core’ (a Bauplan) of the gas exchangers? Comparative functional morphology of the respiratory microvascular systems: illustration of the geometry and rationalization of the fractal properties. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2000;126:491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moira RD, Yi H, Elizabeth SS. Core foundations of abstract geometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:14191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    TaeKyu K, Yunfeng L, Tadamasa S, Zygmunt P. Gestalt-like constraints produce veridical (Euclidean) percepts of 3D indoor scenes. Vis Res. 2015;126:264–77.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    John MF, Nilton PRF, José ADS. Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vis Res. 2004;44:147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamiyoshihara M, Igai H, Ibe T, Kawatani N, Shimizu K, Takeyoshi I. A 3.5-cm single-incision VATS anatomical segmentectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Terzi A, Rocco G. Geometric and ergonomic characteristics of the Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5:118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rocco G. One-port (Uniportal) video-assisted thoracic surgical resections—a clear advance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:S27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Viti A, Terzi A. Geometrical characteristics of Uniportal VATS. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:S214–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Bertolaccini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Thoracic SurgeryMaggiore Teaching HospitalBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations