Skip to main content

Development of 3D VATS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Atlas of Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

To minimize surgical invasion and morbidity, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) techniques, were developed and proven feasible and safe. Furthermore, long-term results proved comparable to thoracotomy, for resection of lung cancer [1], esophageal cancer [2], and thymic tumors [3], but with less morbidity. However, compared with thoracotomy, there is a steep learning curve with VATS because of poorer optics of the hilar structures and dissection planes that result from the two dimensional (2D) view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Falcoz PE, Puyraveau M, Thomas PA, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:602–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang H, Shen Y, Feng M, et al. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1006–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu ZT, Mao T, Chen WH, et al. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and median sternotomy approaches for thymic tumor resections at a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25:47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McLachlan G. From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery? Lancet. 2011;15(378):1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashton RC, Connery CP, Swistel DG, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:292–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pardolesi A, Park B, Petrella F, et al. Robotic anatomic segmentectomy of the lung: technical aspects and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:929–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:383–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamauchi Y, Shinohara K. Effect of binocular stereopsis on surgical manipulation performance and fatigue when using a stereoscopic endoscope. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:611–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang C, Mo L, Ma Y, et al. A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:1798–805.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang C, Wang W, Mo L, et al. Short-term outcome of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for benign pulmonary diseases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagan P, De Dominicis F, Hernigou J, et al. Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems dagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:820–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Z, Li JP, Qin X, et al. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10675–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen K, Ringsted C, Hansen HJ, et al. Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1821–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen K, Bjerrum F, Hansen HJ, et al. A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:420–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/25/uk-cancer-surgery-live-streamed-virtual-reality.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, J. et al. (2019). Development of 3D VATS. In: Gonzalez-Rivas, D., Ng, C., Rocco, G., D’Amico, T. (eds) Atlas of Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2604-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2604-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2603-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2604-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics