Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) inverse problem intends to determine the internal brain signals from EEG electrode signals. Being an ill-posed problem, it needs a regularization function and a regularization parameter (λ). Many techniques have been proposed with different regularization functions, yet all of them still depends on the regularization parameter that can drastically change the solution given its value. In this study we intend to determine if the regularization parameter can be set to a specific value or a smaller interval, and if not, discover what changes in the problem settings causes it to vary. For that we simulated source signals and calculated the signals that these would generate in the EEG electrodes. We then used a genetic algorithm to find the best value of λ applied in different experiments having different regularization functions. Further study is still required, but we could conclude that, for the settings used in this study, different techniques demand different values of λ, and for some experiments with different source signals the value of λ maintained in a smaller interval.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Martínez, J.M.: Functional brain imaging on mobile devices by solving the EEG inverse problem: a structured sparsity approach. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2014)
Jatoi, M.A., Kamel, N., Malik, A.S., et al.: A survey of methods used for source localization using EEG signals. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 11(1), 42–52 (2014)
Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R.: Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 32(1), 35–42 (1994)
Tibshirani, R.: Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 267–288 (1996)
Turlach, B.A., Venables, W.N., Wright, S.J.: Simultaneous variable selection. Technometrics 47(3), 349–363 (2005)
Phillips, C., Rugg, M.D., Friston, K.J.: Anatomically informed basis functions for EEG source localization: combining functional and anatomical constraints. NeuroImage 16(3), 678–695 (2002)
Hämälänien, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., et al.: Magnetoencephalography theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(2), 413–497 (1993)
Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. J. Imaging Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)
Fix, E., Hodges Jr., J.L.: Discriminatory Analysis-Nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency Properties. California Univ Berkeley (1951)
Castaño-Candamil, S., Höhne, J., Martínez-Vargas, J.D., et al.: Solving the EEG inverse problem based on space-time-frequency structured sparsity constraints. NeuroImage 118(1), 598–612 (2015)
Costa, F., Batatia, H., Oberlin, T., et al.: NeuroImage Bayesian EEG source localization using a structured sparsity prior. NeuroImage 144(1), 142–152 (2017)
Phillips, C., Rugg, M.D., Friston, K.J.: Systematic regularization of linear inverse solutions of the EEG source localization problem. NeuroImage 17(1), 287–301 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schmiele, E.F., Soares, A.B. (2019). Analysis of the Regularization Parameter for EEG Inverse Problem Using Genetic Algorithm. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J., Alvarenga, A. (eds) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 70/2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2517-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2517-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2516-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2517-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)