Skip to main content

Efficiency of AR, MA and ARMA Models in Prediction of Raw and Filtered Center of Pressure Signals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

In this study the efficiency of the AR, MA and ARMA models was analyzed for the prediction of a center of pressure signal in a quiet upright stance on a force platform. The analysis was performed to verify differences among the above models to predict the next sample of a signal. A small prediction error allow to predict and replace any gaps in the acquired signals, which is interesting in any area of science, especially when it comes from biological signals in its most varied aspects. The Welch method was used for spectral estimation. The prediction error presented the greatest variation when comparing the cases with raw (unfiltered) and filtered data. We observed that using these models on unfiltered signals resulted in poor prediction; however, the results indicated ARMA modeling as a good predictor using filtered center of pressure signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Duarte, S.M., Freitas, F.M.: Revisão sobre posturografia baseada em plataforma de força para avaliação do equilíbrio. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 183–92 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costa, F.R., Guimarães, B.: Regressão linear aplicada na predição de series temporais fuzzy, XIII simpósio bras. Automação intel. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ljung, L.: System Identification Theory for User. Prentice Hall, River NJ (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozdongan, H.: Model Selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): the General Theory and its Analytical Extensions, 1st edn. (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonçalves, A.C.: Processamento digital de sinais—estimação paramétrica, universidade federal do paraná, p. 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silva, C.J.: Predição de séries temporais no contexto de smart grids, Tese, p. 42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Itiki, C., Nascimento, V.H.: Apostila de processamento de sinais de tempo discreto, p. 220, 1st edn. São Paulo (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haykin, S.: Modern filters, p. 59, 1st edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prieto, T.E., Myklebust, J.B., Hoffmann, R.G., Lovett, E.G., Myklebust, B.M.: Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE 43(9), 956–966 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stins, J.F., Roerdink, M., Beek, P.J.: To freeze or not to freeze? affective and cognitive perturbations have markedly different effects on postural control. Hum. Mov. Sci. 30(2), 190–202 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stins, J.F., Michielsen, M.E., Roerdink, M., Beek, P.J.: Sway regularity reflects attentional involvement in postural control: effects of expertise, vision and cognition. Gait Posture 30(1), 106–109 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Mathworks Inc., “MATLAB—MathWorks” (2016). www.mathworks.com/products/matlab. http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/. Last accessed 2018/06/08

  13. Welch, P.D.: The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15(2), 70–73 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Musolino, B.C.: Algoritmo de determinação do coeficiente de amortecimento em materiais refratários de alta alumina, Universidade de São Paulo, p. 16, São Carlos (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES), the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Goiás (FAPEG) and the Amparo Foundation to the State of Minas Gerais Research (FAPEMIG). A. O. Andrade is a Fellow of CNPq, Brazil (305223/2014-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Augusto Gomes De Villa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Villa, G.A.G. et al. (2019). Efficiency of AR, MA and ARMA Models in Prediction of Raw and Filtered Center of Pressure Signals. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J., Alvarenga, A. (eds) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 70/2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2517-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2517-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2516-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2517-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics