Abstract
The globalization talks form the neoliberal agenda in higher education. When the changing governance for responding to the neoliberal agenda is put into a context for examination, critical space is created for rethinking the role and meaning of higher education beyond being economized, marketized, and privatized, especially views from institutional practices in those unconventional cases. This belief supports this study by examining the National University of Tainan (NUTN), Taiwan, that experienced a transformation from a century-old family-like teacher education status to a comprehensive university, to show how the neoliberal agenda affects its institutional practices. The study adopted a documentary analysis for data collection. The main findings reveal that the neoliberal agenda had mixed impacts on the NUTN, surely more rhetoric than practices, due to its family-like organization culture favoring the collegiality. But the governance in the NUTN case reflects the collegiality-bound bureaucracy with greater accountability over the corporate practices. Thus, being forced to move out of the government monopoly, it is high time for NUTN to use the external neoliberal agenda wisely and strategically to make collegiality-bound bureaucracy governance model responsive to increasing external demands and changes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3–25.
Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university. Jossey-Bass.
Bargh, C., Scott, P., & Smith, D. (1996). Governing universities: Changing the culture? Open University Press/SRHE.
Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education. London: Routledge.
Berdahl, R. (1993). Public universities and state governments: Is the tension benign? In CEPES/UNESCO, Academic freedom and university autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.
Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2006). Comparison and theories. In M. Kogan, M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, & M. Henkel (Eds.), Transforming higher education: A comparative study (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Caglar, A. (1993). Academic freedom, autonomy, and accountability in the restructuring and coordination of multi-university national systems. CEPES/UNESCO, academic freedom and university autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.
Chan, S. J., & Lin, L. W. (2015). Massification of higher education in Taiwan: Shifting pressure from admission to employment. Higher Education Policy, 28, 17–33.
Chan, S. J., & Yang, C. C. (2017). Hybrid university in Taiwan: The prominence of traditional intellects. Studies in Higher Education, 42(10), 1853–1869.
Chen, D. W. (2005). The reform of higher education in Taiwan from perspective of the revision of the University Act. Retrieved from http://www.fgu.edu.tw/~secretary/word/index/…/index-new-178.doc.
Chiang, L. C. (2000). The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and in Taiwan (PhD Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London).
Christopher, J. (2014). Australian public universities: Are they practising a corporate approach to governance. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 560–573.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. IAU Press.
Clark, B. R. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 9–24.
Currie, J., & Newson, J. (1998). Globalizing practices: Corporate managerialism, accountability and privatization. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives (pp. 141–151). California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Daun, B. C. (1997). The education act and academic freedom. Taipei: Yue-dan Press.
Duderstadt, J. (2000). A university for the 21st century. The University of Michigan Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Harman, G. (1992). Governance, administration and finance. In B. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1279–1293). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hou, A. Y. C. (2011). Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education. Higher Education, 61, 179–191.
Hou, A. Y. C. (2012). Impact of excellence programs on Taiwan higher education in terms of quality assurance and academic excellence, examining the conflicting role of Taiwan’s accrediting agencies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 77–88.
ICEF Monitor. (2015). Taiwan plans to close up to a third of its universities in the next decade. http://monitor.icef.com/2015/04/taiwan-plans-to-close-up-to-a-third-of-its-universities-in-the-next-decade/ (April 7, 2015).
ICEF Monitor. (2016). Taiwan’s higher education enrolment starts a downward slide. http://monitor.icef.com/2016/08/taiwans-higher-education-enrolment-starts-downward-slide/ (August 16, 2016).
Kerr, C. (1995). The uses of the university (4th ed.). Harvard University Press.
Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (Eds.). (2006). Transforming higher education: A comparative study (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Luke, C. (1997). Quality assurance and women in higher education. Higher Education, 33, 433–451.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the confucian model. Higher Education, 61, 587–611.
Mayor, F. (1993). Academic freedom and university autonomy. CEPES/UNESCO, academic freedom and university autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.
Mok, K. H. (1999). The cost of managerialism: The implications for the ‘McDonaldisation’ of higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 117–127.
Mok, K. H. (2002). From nationalization to marketization: changing governance in Taiwan’s higher education system. Governance, 15, 137–159.
Mok, K. H. (2010). Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: a comparative study of China and Taiwan. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 87–103.
Romero, F. C. (2017). The transformation of university: an assessment of the literature. In M. Rich (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ECMLG 2017) (pp. 425–433). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Shin, J. C., & Harman, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 1–13.
Sizer, J. (1992). Accountability. In B. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1305–1313). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tang, S. Y. F. (2015). The creeping of neo-liberal influences into teacher education policy: The case of Hong Kong. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 271–282.
Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (1998). Continuity and change in the collegial tradition. Higher Education Quarterly, 52(2), 142–161.
Tuck, E. (2013). Neoliberalism as nihilism: A commentary on educational accountability, teacher education, and school reform. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(2), 324–347.
Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121–131.
Woodhouse, H. (2017). The contested terrain of academic freedom in Canada’s universities: Where are we going? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 76(3), 618–647.
Yang, S. K., & Huang, J. L. (Eds.). (2016). Teacher education in Taiwan: State control vs marketization. London and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 11.1 Key Description of the Selected Documents
Appendix 11.1 Key Description of the Selected Documents
Document name | Date | Code number | Key description |
---|---|---|---|
Stage 1: teacher education (TE) (1994–2004) | |||
Briefing for MOE Inspection | April 1996 | TEDoc1 | Under the MOE regular review |
Minute of the Council Meeting | 1998 | TEDoc2 | Decided to upgrade to “Tainan Normal University” |
Minute of the Council Meeting | 2000 | TEDoc3 | Raised staff awareness about external changes |
Minute of the Council Meeting | Jan. 2003 | TEDoc4 | Decided to change its name to “University of Tainan” |
Minute of the Council Meeting | June 2004 | TEDoc5 | MOE failed the application for raising the tuition fee level |
Transformation Proposal for Tainan Normal University | Sep. 1998 | TEDoc6 | Submitted to the MOE after acquiring council approval |
Transformation Proposal for University of Tainan | May 2004 | TEDoc7 | Re-submitted to the MOE after acquiring council approval |
Proposal for Moving Whole Institution to New Campus | Sep. 2000 | TEDoc8 | Found solution to the limited space for a comprehensive university |
Year Report | 2002 | TEDoc9 | NUTN’s first annual report |
Stage 2: university (U) (2004–present) | |||
2005 Mid-term and long-term university development plan | April 2005 | UDoc1 | Required by the MOE: first time NUTN had such a detailed plan |
2008 Mid-term and long-term university development plan | June 2008 | UDoc2 | Different from UDoc1, this was initiated from within |
2011 Mid-term and long-term university development plan | March 2011 | UDoc3 | Initiated from within |
2016 Mid-term and long-term university development plan | June 2016 | UDoc4 | Initiated from within |
MOE’s Review on Transforming to a University | May 2005 | UDoc5 | Conducted in the first year after upgrading |
2011 External Evaluation Report | 2011 | UDoc6 | Received its first accreditation certificate |
Minutes of Annual Consultation Meeting | 2008–2015 | UDoc7–UDoc14 | Sought external views and suggestions on NUTN development |
2016 Financial Planning Report | 2015 | UDoc15 | First time NUTN should submit such a report for MOE’s approval. |
Regulation on Awarding Departments with Good Research Performance | 2005 | UDoc16 | The first explicit and competitive rule among departments for research performance |
Regulation on Evaluation of Faculty Member | 2006 | UDoc17 | Faculty members should be evaluated |
Regulation on Awarding Departments with Good Teaching Practices | 2007 | UDoc18 | The first explicit and competitive rule among departments for teaching excellence |
Regulation on Encouraging Faculty Using English as Medium of Instruction | 2007 | UDoc19 | Under the external pressure to internationalize |
Regulation on Awarding Faculty with Good Performance in Research and Education Quality | 2005 | UDoc20 | Award based mainly on individual academics’ publication efforts |
Regulation on Organizing Student Recruitment Committee | 2016 | UDoc21 | The first clear rule for such a committee |
Regulation on Student Place Adjustment | Dec. 2016 | UDoc22 | Internal adjustment before the MOE cut student places |
Regulation on Financial Incentive for Recruitment Full-paying Foreign Students | 2016 | UDoc23 | Made incentive explicit to raise the number of foreign students |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiang, L.Lc. (2018). How a Century-Old Family-Like University Responds to the Neoliberal Agenda: The Case of National University of Tainan. In: Shin, J. (eds) Higher Education Governance in East Asia. Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2469-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2469-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2468-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2469-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)