Skip to main content

Intelligent Decision Making Tools in Manufacturing Technology Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Futuristic Composites

Abstract

The importance of technology in modern companies is literally growing. Technology protects the natural environment and acts as catalyst toward a more productive economy. Technology development has been the most demanding activity in industrial sectors over years and technology selection and implementation is one of the acknowledged projects in many companies. There are many factors influencing the problem of evaluating and choosing a new technology. Therefore, manufacturing operation managers are involved in a decision-making system with conflicting elements in their selection process. In this condition, application of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) tools is highly recommended. This study examines the utilization of analytic hierarchy process and an adopted MADM method named CoCoSo to simultaneously determine the importance of decision factors and obtain the optimal ranking. At the final stage, we configure a sensitivity analysis to check and examine the accuracy of the results and performance of the present decision system. The study corresponds to a case study of choosing best packaging technology for a dairy company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cetindamar D, Phaal R, Probert D (2016) Technology management: activities and tools. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aliakbari Nouri F, Khalili Esbouei S, Antucheviciene J (2015) A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for technology selection. Informatica 26(3):369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farooq S, O’Brien C (2015) An action research methodology for manufacturing technology selection: a supply chain perspective. Prod Plann Control 26(6):467–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yazdani M, Zarate P, Coulibaly A, Zavadskas EK (2017) A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management. Expert Syst Appl 88:376–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandenburg M, Govindan K, Sarkis J, Seuring S (2014) Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H (2015) Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ 162:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tavana M, Yazdani M, Di Caprio D (2017) An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. Int J Logist Res Appl 20(3):254–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pålsson H, Finnsgård C, Wänström C (2013) Selection of packaging systems in supply chains from a sustainability perspective: the case of Volvo. Packag Technol Sci 26(5):289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohanty RP, Deshmukh SG (1998) Advanced manufacturing technology selection: a strategic model for learning and evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 55(3):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kengpol A, O’Brien C (2001) The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achieve rapid product development. Int J Prod Econ 69(2):177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dağdeviren M (2008) Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J Intell Manuf 19(4):397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anand G, Kodali R (2008) Selection of lean manufacturing systems using the PROMETHEE. J Model Manage 3(1):40–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Abtahi AR (2013) A hybrid fuzzy group decision support framework for advanced-technology prioritization at NASA. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):480–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Krisciukaitienė I, Balezentis A (2012) Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3302–3311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chuu S-J (2014) An investment evaluation of supply chain RFID technologies: a group decision-making model with multiple information sources. Knowl-Based Syst 66:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu HC, You JX, Lu C, Shan MM (2014) Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection. Waste Manag 34(11):2355–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans L, Lohse N, Summers M (2013) A fuzzy-decision-tree approach for manufacturing technology selection exploiting experience-based information. Expert Syst Appl 40(16):6412–6426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farooq S, O’Brien C (2012) A technology selection framework for integrating manufacturing within a supply chain. Int J Prod Res 50(11):2987–3010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saen RF (2009) Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(7–8):827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Almannai B, Greenough R, Kay J (2008) A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24(4):501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chuu SJ (2009) Selecting the advanced manufacturing technology using fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making with multiple fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng 57(3):1033–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aloini D, Dulmin R, Mininno V (2014) A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection. Expert Syst Appl 41(5):2157–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathiyazhagan K, Diabat A, Al-Refaie A, Xu L (2015) Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 107:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, pp 262–301

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Yazdani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P. (2018). Intelligent Decision Making Tools in Manufacturing Technology Selection. In: Sidhu, S., Bains, P., Zitoune, R., Yazdani, M. (eds) Futuristic Composites . Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2417-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics