Advertisement

Risk Assessment of Voltage Limit Violation Based on Probabilistic Load Flow in Active Distribution Network

  • Jing DongEmail author
  • Xue LiEmail author
  • Dajun Du
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 925)

Abstract

This paper mainly investigates risk assessment of voltage limit violation in active distribution network with integration of wind generation (WG), photovoltaic generation (PVG) and electric vehicles (EVs). Firstly, to avoid additional peak load caused by random EV charging, a controlled EV charging and discharging strategy is designed. Then, for the correlations of spatially near WGs and PVGs, Nataf transformation and orthogonal transformation (OT) are integrated to solve the problem, and this provides a path for point estimate method (PEM) based probabilistic load flow (PLF) to obtain steady-state voltage of active distribution network. Furthermore, based on the voltage results, a model for quantifying the risk of voltage limit violation is developed by considering loss of load caused by voltage limit violation, which is different from the previous risk indices calculated by possibility and severity of voltage limit violation. Finally, the proposed model is tested on the modified IEEE 33-bus system. Simulation results confirm that the effective EV charging/discharging strategies and penetration increment of WG and PVG help to decrease operation risk of active distribution network.

Keywords

Risk assessment Voltage limit violation Active distribution network EV charging/discharging strategy Correlation Loss of load 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the national Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61773253, and project of Science and technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality under Grants No. 15JC1401900, 14JC1402200, and 17511107002.

References

  1. 1.
    Procopiou, A., Quiros-Tortos, J., Ochoa, L.: HPC-based probabilistic analysis of LV networks with EVs: impacts and control. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(3), 1479–1487 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, X., Shahidehpour, M., Li, Z., Liu, X., Cao, Y., Li, Z.: Power system risk assessment in cyber attacks considering the role of protection systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(2), 572–580 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, S., Hou, H., Wang, C., Hao, G., Hao, F.: Review on risk assessment of power system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 109, 1200–1205 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wan, H., Mccalley, J.D., Vittal, V.: Risk based voltage security assessment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(4), 1247–1254 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prusty, B.R., Jena, D.: An over-limit risk assessment of PV integrated power system using probabilistic load flow based on multi-time instant uncertainty modeling. Renew. Energy 116, 367–383 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akbari, M.A., et al.: New metrics for evaluating technical benefits and risks of DGs increasing penetration. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(6), 2890–2902 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, X., Zhang, X., Wu, L., Lu, P., Zhang, S.: Transmission line overload risk assessment for power systems with wind and load-power generation correlation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(3), 1233–1242 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Negnevitsky, M., Nguyen, D.H., Piekutowski, M.: Risk assessment for power system planning with high wind power penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30(3), 1359–1368 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Shi, X., Terzija, V.: Probabilistic optimal PV capacity planning for wind farm expansion based on NASA data. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 8(3), 1291–1300 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, Z., Wen, F., Ledwich, G.: Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generators in distribution systems considering uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 26(4), 2541–2551 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pouladi, J., Sharifian, M.B.B., Soleymani, S.: Determining charging load of PHEVs considering HVAC system and analyzing its probabilistic impacts on residential distribution network. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 141, 300–312 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saunders, C.S.: Point estimate method addressing correlated wind power for probabilistic optimal power flow. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29(3), 1045–1054 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Liu, W., Yu, D., Li, Z., Liu, J.: The stochastic response surface method for small-signal stability study of power system with probabilistic uncertainties in correlated photovoltaic and load. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(6), 4551–4559 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, X., Chen, H., Lu, P., Du, D.: Space transformation-based interdependency modelling for probabilistic load flow analysis of power systems. J. Donghua Univ. 33(5), 734–739 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Power Station Automation TechnologyShanghai UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations