Advertisement

Technological Updating Decision–Making Model for Eco–Factory Through Dynamic Programming

  • Erheng Chen
  • Huajun CaoEmail author
  • Kun Wang
  • Salman Jafar
  • Qinyi He
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 925)

Abstract

As the key subject of the green manufacturing system, the construction of eco–factory has become an important content in order to achieve the sustainable development of enterprises. In this paper, a technological updating decision-making model is established based on dynamic programming (DP) for eco–factory. Firstly, the evaluation index system for eco–factory is established. Secondly, the local weight and global weight of each index are calculated based on analytic network process (ANP) and Delphi method. Finally, the decision–making model of eco-factory is established to find the optimal investment plan by using the method of logarithmic fitting and DP. The ANP and Delphi method present a great potential in solving complex and ambiguous problems and the decision-making based on DP can obtain the better ecological benefits through an example of a foundry factory, therefore the feasibility of the proposed method is proved.

Keywords

Eco-factory Ecological benefits Analytic network process Dynamic programming Decision-making 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn, S.H.: An evaluation of green manufacturing technologies based on research databases. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 1(1), 5–9 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kai, S., Leino, T., Joutsiniemi, A.: Sustainable manufacturing and eco-factories within sustainable industrial areas within fast growing eco-cities sustainable manufacturing and eco-factories within sustainable industrial areas within fast growing eco-cities. In: Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fantini, P., Palasciano, C., Taisch, M.: Back to intuition: proposal for a performance indicators framework to facilitate eco-factories management and benchmarking. Procedia CIRP 26, 1–6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taisch, M., Stahl, B.: Requirements analysis and definition for eco-factories: the case of EMC2. In: Emmanouilidis, C., Taisch, M., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2012. IAICT, vol. 397, pp. 111–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40352-1_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leong, Y.T., Lee, J.Y., Tan, R.R., et al.: Multi-objective optimization for resource network synthesis in eco-industrial parks using an integrated analytic hierarchy process. J. Clean. Prod. 143, 1268–1283 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    May, G., Stahl, B., Taisch, M.: Energy management in manufacturing: toward eco-factories of the future–a focus group study. Appl. Energy 164, 628–638 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reinhard, J., Zah, R., Wohlgemuth, V., et al.: Applying life cycle assessment within discrete event simulation: practical application of the Milan/EcoFactory material flow simulator (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wen, J.H., Jiang, H.L., Zhang, M., et al.: Application of dynamic programming in resources optimization allocation of factory production line. Key Eng. Mater. 474–476(1), 1632–1637 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia, J., Yang, Y., Yang, T., et al.: Research on dynamic programming of the series manufacturing system reliability allocation. J. Converg. Inf. Technol. 7(7), 17–25 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdul-Zahra, In, Abbas, I.T., Kalaf, B.A., et al.: The role of dynamic programming in the distribution of investment allocations between production lines with an application in the (men’s clothing factory in Najaf holy). Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 106(2), 365–380 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M.: A hybrid approach based on ANP and grey relational analysis for machine selection. Tehnicki Vjesnik 24, 109–118 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayağ, Z., Özdemir, R.G.: Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(2), 630–636 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. Springer, Berlin (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, H., Tao, M., Sun, Z.: Research on the process evaluation of green university based on concordance analysis. In: International Conference on Chinese Control and Decision Conference, pp. 3642–3646. IEEE Press (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ullah, S.M.S., Muhammad, I., Ko, T.J.: Optimal strategy to deal with decision making problems in machine tools remanufacturing. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 3(1), 19–26 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erheng Chen
    • 1
  • Huajun Cao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kun Wang
    • 1
  • Salman Jafar
    • 1
  • Qinyi He
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical TransmissionChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Pittsburgh InstituteSichuan UniversitySichuanChina

Personalised recommendations